korrents

What Casey Handmer thinks about energy

@casey-handmer · 76 positions · 2 changes of mind

Physicist, formerly at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, and founder of Terraform Industries, which is building plant to make synthetic natural gas from sunlight and air. Writes about energy, space and manufacturing at caseyhandmer.wordpress.com.

Everything they publish, on ppll ↗

Casey Handmer did not write this page.

We collected these quotes from things they published elsewhere, and every quote links to where it was said. They have no account here and have not endorsed this site. Quotes are word for word; the short line under each one is our own restatement, not their wording. Their own site. Is this you? Claim it or ask us to remove it. Or tell us what is wrong here.

18 dated positions, 2019 to 2025, in their own words. Our reading of what Casey Handmer has said — not written or endorsed by them.

Where the solar positions argue about supply, these argue about what has to be rebuilt around it: seasonal storage treated as a heat problem, batteries replacing transmission, and a grid that shrinks rather than grows. The obstacle named throughout is permitting and delay rather than cost.

Do we need to drastically expand the grid in order to metabolize renewables? No.
  1. Do we need to drastically expand the grid in order to metabolize renewables? No.

    Energy Predictions 2025caseyhandmer.wordpress.com 1st of 6 in this piece

    batteries

  2. Storing electricity for months is economically difficult, but storing heat is easy.

    Energy Predictions 2025caseyhandmer.wordpress.com 3rd of 6 in this piece

    batteries

  3. While heat pumps can achieve higher efficiency, consumer uptake has been much lower than expected because fundamentally, a heat pump is a 20 year bet on future power prices that most homeowners are unwilling to make.

    Energy Predictions 2025caseyhandmer.wordpress.com 4th of 6 in this piece

  4. By 2045, natural gas will be used as LNG primarily for high performance supersonic aviation, shipping, and industrial heat.

    Energy Predictions 2025caseyhandmer.wordpress.com 5th of 6 in this piece

    aviation

  5. The only highly populated industrial country unable to trivially meet its electricity and synthetic fuel needs with solar alone is the United Kingdom, due primarily to a high population density and high latitude. The Nordic and Baltic countries are tiny by comparison. Among other problems, the UK needs to decide if it wants the future where energy is cheap and it is rich, or the future where energy is expensive and it is poor. If the former, it is time to get serious about large scale deployment of wind power, using home-grown vertically integrated technology at prices as low as $10/MWh.

    Energy Predictions 2025caseyhandmer.wordpress.com 6th of 6 in this piece

    solar

  6. 4 months earlier
  7. well their cost of serving it is is like maybe a buck per million tokens or something like that and the cost of electricity is about 10% of that. So it's like 10 cents of electricity is generating $1,000 worth of economic value.

    China is killing the US on energy. Does that mean they’ll win AGI? — Casey Handmeryoutube.com 9th of 24 in this recording

  8. In terms of things that are causing us to lose to China, tariffs are neither here nor there because, as we've discussed, we're not sensitive to cost on power. But the environmental regulations that are actively preventing us from deploying renewable energy in the United States, like this is the reason Texas is winning. Texas is out deploying California 10 to1.

    China is killing the US on energy. Does that mean they’ll win AGI? — Casey Handmeryoutube.com 16th of 24 in this recording

    ChinaAmericatariffs

  9. the meta problem here is if we don't move our industrial stack off fossil fuels in 10 or 20 years, first of all, we'll get poor the same way you UK did, right? Because they ran out of coal basically. And the second thing is we'll get poor because we'll flood our coastal cities in Florida underneath climate change.

    China is killing the US on energy. Does that mean they’ll win AGI? — Casey Handmeryoutube.com 18th of 24 in this recording

    climate change

  10. 21 months earlier
  11. The terrorist attacks on 9/11 killed 2996 people in a day of singular horror. Our ongoing indifference to regulatory inefficiency, considering only the area of green energy development, kills more people every year – more than 10 people per day, and that’s only within the US.

    Permitting Reform Or Deathcaseyhandmer.wordpress.com 3rd of 4 in this piece

    Americapermitting

  12. 4 weeks earlier
  13. Per doubling of production, costs have fallen a consistent 30-40% since 1970, but it’s only in the last few years that this price has become competitive with legacy electricity generation

    Radical Energy Abundancecaseyhandmer.wordpress.com 1st of 7 in this piece

    solar

  14. The logical end state of this displacement is not some hybrid grid with around 20% solar backed up by spinning generation, but a much more dynamic, versatile grid with around 200% solar generation and hours to days or weeks of battery storage, fully decoupling time of generation and consumption.

    Radical Energy Abundancecaseyhandmer.wordpress.com 3rd of 7 in this piece

    solarbatteries

  15. we will see batteries aggressively displace transmission as the most cost-effective way to ensure continuity of electricity supply, leading to an eventual pruning of the grid and drastic reduction in the average distance that power travels between production and consumption, even as the average time that power is stored increases.

    Radical Energy Abundancecaseyhandmer.wordpress.com 4th of 7 in this piece

    batteries

  16. Cheap solar is the unlock that brings human progress and climate action from the realm of fundamental incompatibility to complimentary inevitability.

    Radical Energy Abundancecaseyhandmer.wordpress.com 6th of 7 in this piece

    solar

  17. Following current trends to second order, >95% of humanity’s energy needs will be downstream of solar panels by 2042, just 19 years away, and alongside enormous expansion in direct use of electricity, fuel consumption will grow to more than $25T/year in equivalent dollars.

    Radical Energy Abundancecaseyhandmer.wordpress.com 7th of 7 in this piece

    solar

  18. We expect growth to at least double to 6%/year, for a cumulative tripling of the global economy by 2042.

    Radical Energy Abundancecaseyhandmer.wordpress.com 8th of 7 in this piece

  19. 8 weeks earlier
  20. it is quite obviously impossible to enforce universal adoption of more expensive carbon-free energy through, eg, mandatory carbon offsets, as higher gas prices are political suicide regardless of system of government.

    How to Produce Green Hydrogen for $1/kgcaseyhandmer.wordpress.com 1st of 3 in this piece

    government

  21. I am 100% confident that by the time we are mass producing this system at these prices later this decade, not only will this be the cheapest hydrogen available anywhere, it will also be the cheapest chemical energy and by far the most scalable

    How to Produce Green Hydrogen for $1/kgcaseyhandmer.wordpress.com 3rd of 3 in this piece

    solar

  22. 4 years earlier
  23. My view is that space-based solar power is impossibly expensive and will never be used on Earth.

    Space-based solar power is not a thingcaseyhandmer.wordpress.com 1st of 3 in this piece

    solar