korrents

korrents · Dwarkesh Podcast

China is killing the US on energy. Does that mean they’ll win AGI? — Casey Handmer

Casey Handmer · 1h 08m · youtube.com

24 korrents from this recording

1h
Casey Handmer did not write this page.

Every claim below is a statement made in this recording, quoted word for word and linked to the second it was said, so you can hear it rather than take our word for it. The wording comes from the transcript published alongside the recording; the sentence above each quote is our reading of the claim, not their wording.

  1. 0:01:16 · watch on youtube.com

    I would never like hold up a flag saying I'm really good at building highspeed trains. Like that is just a sign that you're really bad at capital allocation.
  2. 1 min later
  3. 0:01:48 · watch on youtube.com

    China is surrounded by 15 countries who are mostly hostile to it, right? with no good like mountain ranges or rivers or anything to really separate them. And then they get all their oil, almost all their oil from the Middle East, right in countries that they don't control, don't have strong diplomatic relationships with on fleets of oil tankers that they can't defend because their navy doesn't have the ability to to operate effectively in the Indian Ocean.
  4. 0:02:17 · watch on youtube.com

    It absolutely asymmetrically helps China. We're not currently working with China. They don't plan to, but like the physics is very obvious, you know, and synthetic fuels have been around for 100 years.
  5. 3 min later
  6. 0:05:21 · watch on youtube.com

    so the mainstream view would say, well, China has cheaper labor, which is no longer true, uh, say compared to Mexico, and it's got lower environmental regulations, uh, which is true, and that it is more businessfriendly, which is absolutely crazy.
  7. 1 min later
  8. 0:06:32 · watch on youtube.com

    And I think the United States could probably do that in 2 years or less if you started today. Like it's currently 11:00, so like we're going to start cutting checks by noon.
  9. 1 min later
  10. 0:07:33 · watch on youtube.com

    They're focused on the chips, right? Because they understand like the key bottleneck is the chips, not the solar power, right?
  11. 3 min later
  12. 0:10:48 · watch on youtube.com

    We're not going to run out of natural gas at 1 gawatt per year indefinitely. Okay, what if we're doing 5 gawatts per year? What if we're doing 50 gawatts per year? What if we're doing 100 gawatt per year? Like, you can you can just break the situation.
  13. 3 min later
  14. 0:13:45 · watch on youtube.com

    you're going to have to build your own power plant for them, which is how it used to work. Like if you if you had an aluminum plant back in the day, you would be building your own power plant for it as well.
  15. 4 min later
  16. 0:17:31 · watch on youtube.com

    well their cost of serving it is is like maybe a buck per million tokens or something like that and the cost of electricity is about 10% of that. So it's like 10 cents of electricity is generating $1,000 worth of economic value.
  17. 3 min later
  18. 0:20:06 · watch on youtube.com

    It is not only the case that solar adoption, production, price decreases are continuing. They're accelerating. And the rate that they're accelerating is still accelerating.
  19. 2 min later
  20. 0:21:48 · watch on youtube.com

    You you also don't know like in order to make that money back, you have to then operate that plant at that capacity for 20 years, right? And if I was looking at the same charts as they're looking at right now, I'd say what are the odds that in 25 years time we can produce gas turbines at a price that is relevant in a world where solar is already at its current price and batteries at a price where they're already like you cannot win.
  21. 3 min later
  22. 0:25:13 · watch on youtube.com

    So I think within a few years we'll probably see that like the majority of new DCs that are going in will be mostly solar
  23. 7 min later
  24. 0:32:40 · watch on youtube.com

    But then all you need to connect that to the outside world is like an optical fiber, right? An optical fiber cable which you can string up on poles, you can run underground, you could even use microwave links if you really wanted to.
  25. 1 min later
  26. 0:33:53 · watch on youtube.com

    actually it turns out that you can significantly decrease power consumption with a very small reduction in overall compute. So if you if you've got like three really bad days in a row or something, you can actually just like you can dial back your power usage quite a lot without compromising your inference or or um or training.
  27. 5 min later
  28. 0:38:47 · watch on youtube.com

    central takeaway is that is that the hyperscalers are not power cost sensitive they are power availability sensitive
  29. 2 min later
  30. 0:40:52 · watch on youtube.com

    In terms of things that are causing us to lose to China, tariffs are neither here nor there because, as we've discussed, we're not sensitive to cost on power. But the environmental regulations that are actively preventing us from deploying renewable energy in the United States, like this is the reason Texas is winning. Texas is out deploying California 10 to1.
  31. 1 min later
  32. 0:42:14 · watch on youtube.com

    And the impact of solar array on desert is arguably positive because it shades the ground and improves like soil moisture retention. Um there like if you wanted to reverse desertification, you would basically just deploy solar panels on it and that would pay for the process.
  33. 1 min later
  34. 0:43:40 · watch on youtube.com

    the meta problem here is if we don't move our industrial stack off fossil fuels in 10 or 20 years, first of all, we'll get poor the same way you UK did, right? Because they ran out of coal basically. And the second thing is we'll get poor because we'll flood our coastal cities in Florida underneath climate change.
  35. 5 min later
  36. 0:48:13 · watch on youtube.com

    So it's just very clear that like the average distance the electron is going to travel between generation and consumption is going to decrease in the future pretty radically.
  37. 4 min later
  38. 0:51:51 · watch on youtube.com

    And the bottleneck prior to what we call the industrial revolution was uh metabolism, right? It's just like how much like oats can a human or a horse physically digest and then convert into useful mechanical output for you know their their um their peasant overlord or whatever.
  39. 4 min later
  40. 0:55:47 · watch on youtube.com

    because it's not competing against humans for most of those roles, it would be competing against the other labs, right? And so you'd actually see like the cost pushed down to, you know, a mult a small multiple of whatever the marginal production cost of those tokens is.
  41. 4 min later
  42. 0:59:42 · watch on youtube.com

    so what you actually need is a big slab of relatively cheap silicon to make the power and then a small slab of relatively expensive silicon to do the thinking.
  43. 2 min later
  44. 1:01:39 · watch on youtube.com

    one square meter of silicon like like the thickness of a sheet of paper floating in space that's a future human form that's that's my final form
  45. 2 min later
  46. 1:03:11 · watch on youtube.com

    You can revisit a bunch of legacy industrial processes that are have been optimized for efficiency and say, well, what if we just like use twice as much power and we just want to do them faster and cheaper, right? Like less capex, less lead time, more power, right?