aviation
Flying and the machines that do it: propulsion, airlines, runways, and what happened to Boeing.
FilterEveryone, all time
- SA
Scott Alexander quoted
Their wordsRather than treat AI as similar to airplanes, we should treat it as something between airplanes and humans. We don’t know exactly where on this spectrum they will land, but we can no longer be certain that AI will lack any given humanlike motivation.
- 2 weeks earlier
- MK
Michael Kratsios quoted
Their wordsI think it's the most obvious sort of like in your face example of technological stagnation. We had the Concorde flying years ago. We're flying slower than we were back then today. Absolute tragedy.
↗Michael Kratsios: Inside the White House's AI Strategyyoutube.com 13th of 20 in this recording
- 3 weeks earlier
- PC
Patrick Collison quoted
Their wordsI mean, obviously aviation was was a pretty big deal, but uh I I I don't think it was sort of quite the um the sociological rewriting that some of the you know excitable proponents at the time imagined. So I am you know it's it's hard to predict anything especially the future but I would I would take the under on this being the last couple of years to get a company going.
↗Patrick Collison: Is AI Breaking the Lean Startup Playbook?youtube.com 6th of 20 in this recording
- 3 days earlier
- BS
Blake Scholl quoted
Their wordsIn 1969, we landed on the moon for the first time and the same year we flew Concord, the faster than the speed of sound airliner. The future was supposed to be faster and better. where we're supposed to look forward to innovation in air and in space. And yet, half a century later, we can't go to the moon and we can't fly faster than the speed of sound.
↗Blake Scholl: How 50 People Built a Supersonic Jetyoutube.com 1st of 22 in this recording
- BS
Blake Scholl quoted
Their wordsBut if we fast forward half a century, this is the 787, their latest airliner, which by the way was launched more than 20 years ago. You can't spot the difference. It doesn't fly any faster. It doesn't make the world any more accessible.
↗Blake Scholl: How 50 People Built a Supersonic Jetyoutube.com 3rd of 22 in this recording
- BS
Blake Scholl quoted
Their wordsThose first jetliners truly did double the speed of what had come before them. And was they doubled the speed of air travel, the most important changes were on the ground. Hawaii was simply not a tourist destination before the speed of the jet.
↗Blake Scholl: How 50 People Built a Supersonic Jetyoutube.com 4th of 22 in this recording
- BS
Blake Scholl quoted
Their wordsWell, no. They're not even building new airplanes anymore, let alone innovative new airplanes.
↗Blake Scholl: How 50 People Built a Supersonic Jetyoutube.com 5th of 22 in this recording
- BS
Blake Scholl quoted
Their wordsBut great airplanes are incredibly integrated and everything affects everything else. uh the the best airplane design is interplay of propulsion, of aerodynamics, of structures, of all kinds of optimizations, how you fit the systems into it.
↗Blake Scholl: How 50 People Built a Supersonic Jetyoutube.com 9th of 22 in this recording
- BS
Blake Scholl quoted
Their wordsThis is a supersonic engine adapted for ground power generation that can ship without the rest of the airplane, thereby generating the test data, the learnings, the reliability, and also the capital that we need to go big.
↗Blake Scholl: How 50 People Built a Supersonic Jetyoutube.com 13th of 22 in this recording
- 8 months earlier
- CH
Casey Handmer quoted
Their wordsBy 2045, natural gas will be used as LNG primarily for high performance supersonic aviation, shipping, and industrial heat.
↗Energy Predictions 2025caseyhandmer.wordpress.com 5th of 6 in this piece
- 4 years earlier
- BF
Bjorn Fehrm quoted
Their wordsThe model output, which uses data from 74 presently flying airliner variants, from short-haul Commuters to long haul Widebodies, made with aluminum or composites, shows that the OEW fraction (OEW divided by MTOW) never go below 47%.
↗Bjorn’s Corner: Sustainable Air Transport. Part 4. Reality checks.leehamnews.com 2nd of 3 in this piece
- BF
Bjorn Fehrm quoted
Their wordsThese projects have been around for years, yet no one has done this simple math.
↗Bjorn’s Corner: Sustainable Air Transport. Part 4. Reality checks.leehamnews.com 3rd of 3 in this piece
- 3 months earlier
- AV
by
Austin Vernon quoted
Their wordsSurprisingly, fuel consumption per passenger mile would be lower in a Celera 500 than in a 737. The larger the fuselage, the harder it is to achieve the same drag reduction.
↗Air Travel Doesn't Have to be Terribleaustinvernon.site 1st of 3 in this piece
- AV
by
Austin Vernon quoted
Our readingWhat air travellers actually value is door-to-door time, and public policy tends not to measure it.
Their wordsReduction in door-to-door travel time is king. Public policy may not keep this in mind.
↗Air Travel Doesn't Have to be Terribleaustinvernon.site 2nd of 3 in this piece
- AV
by
Austin Vernon quoted
Our readingThe constraint on point-to-point air travel is runway and tarmac capacity, not room in the sky.
Their wordsThere is much more space in the air than on the airport tarmac. Our current hub and spoke system means some hub airports operate near runway capacity already.
↗Air Travel Doesn't Have to be Terribleaustinvernon.site 3rd of 3 in this piece
- 8 weeks earlier
- AV
Austin Vernon quoted
Their wordsThe changes separated its management and board from the day-to-day processes at the heart of its business.
↗America's Aerospace Industry is Regeneratingaustinvernon.site
- 5 months earlier
- BF
Bjorn Fehrm quoted
Their wordsHaving done the sums before hitting the keys, I was a skeptic. It just didn’t work, even with optimistic assumptions around the parameters for the aircraft and its batteries.
↗Bjorn’s Corner: The challenges of hydrogen. Part 31. Wrap-up: Where we standleehamnews.com 1st of 3 in this piece
- BF
Bjorn Fehrm quoted
Their wordsNow you have a carbon fuel burning aircraft that is more complex and heavier than the plane that it replaces, and if you do your sums carefully, you find that there are no fuel efficiency gains and, therefore, no environmental gains.
↗Bjorn’s Corner: The challenges of hydrogen. Part 31. Wrap-up: Where we standleehamnews.com 2nd of 3 in this piece
- BF
Bjorn Fehrm quoted
Their wordsThere won’t be enough of it for the 25,000 planes flying each day, the feedstock will compete with food production.
↗Bjorn’s Corner: The challenges of hydrogen. Part 31. Wrap-up: Where we standleehamnews.com 3rd of 3 in this piece
- 2 months earlier
- HW
Hillel Wayne quoted
Their wordsRather than fix a trad issue with trad engineering, Boeing opted for the software kludge, and then people died.
- 18 months earlier
- DN
Don Norman quoted
Their wordsHuman error is blamed for over 90 percent of industrial and automobile accidents. It is the leading cause of aviation accidents, and medical error is reported to be the third-largest cause of death in the entire United States. Horrifying? Yes, but why do we label it “human error”? It is design error.
- 13 months earlier
- SB
Samo Burja quoted
Their wordsAnd just as a tornado cannot assemble a Boeing 747 by passing through a junkyard, functional institutions are not spontaneously generated. The machinery, if it functions, was assembled by someone with good judgment: the institution’s founder.
↗Functional Institutions are the Exceptionsamoburja.com 1st of 2 in this piece
- 3 years earlier
- DL
Dan Luu quoted
Their wordsIt's well studied in a number of other contexts including healthcare, aviation, mechanical engineering, aerospace engineering, and civil engineering, but we don't see it discussed in the context of software.
- 3 years earlier
- WH
Wayne Hale quoted
Their wordsWe were told that flying in the space shuttle was just as safe as flying in a commercial airliner, so we denied the crew parachutes and pressure suits.
↗After Ten Years: Enduring Lessonswaynehale.wordpress.com 4th of 4 in this piece
- 4 years earlier
- DM
David MacKay quoted
Their wordsplanes are already almost as energy-efficient as they could possibly be. Planes unavoidably have to use energy for two reasons: they have to throw air down in order to stay up, and they need energy to overcome air resistance. No redesign of a plane is going to radically improve its efficiency.
↗Sustainable Energy — without the hot airinference.org.uk 5th of 27 in this piece