korrents

batteries

Storage as the thing that decides how much intermittent generation is worth building.

What people on korrents have said about batteries, newest first — 19 positions from 8 people.

FilterEveryone, all time
  1. NS

    Noah Smith quoted

    Because solar has, broadly speaking, won the technological race. Intermittency was the last big problem, and batteries have gotten good and cheap enough to make solar reliable.

    Why you won’t get a flying carnoahpinion.blog

    solarenergynuclear power

  2. 6 months earlier
  3. DP

    Dylan Patel quoted

    Then all of a sudden, you've unlocked 20% of the US grid for data centers because most of the times that capacity is sitting idle and it's really only there for that peak, right? Which is a day or two, right?

    Dylan Patel — The single biggest bottleneck to scaling AI computeyoutube.com 21st of 28 in this recording

    data centers

  4. 3 months earlier
  5. HR

    Hannah Ritchie quoted

    The rapid drop in renewable energy costs in the last decade (alongside huge improvements in battery technologies) has started to break this deadlock.

    Can we break the human development-environment trade-off?sustainabilitybynumbers.com 3rd of 4 in this piece

    energy

  6. 1 day earlier
  7. CH

    Casey Handmer quoted

    Do we need to drastically expand the grid in order to metabolize renewables? No.

    Energy Predictions 2025caseyhandmer.wordpress.com 1st of 6 in this piece

    energy

  8. CH

    Casey Handmer quoted

    Storing electricity for months is economically difficult, but storing heat is easy.

    Energy Predictions 2025caseyhandmer.wordpress.com 3rd of 6 in this piece

    energy

  9. 4 months earlier
  10. CH

    Casey Handmer quoted

    You you also don't know like in order to make that money back, you have to then operate that plant at that capacity for 20 years, right? And if I was looking at the same charts as they're looking at right now, I'd say what are the odds that in 25 years time we can produce gas turbines at a price that is relevant in a world where solar is already at its current price and batteries at a price where they're already like you cannot win.

    China is killing the US on energy. Does that mean they’ll win AGI? — Casey Handmeryoutube.com 11th of 24 in this recording

    solar

  11. 3 weeks earlier
  12. DH

    Demis Hassabis quoted

    I think fusion and solar are the two that I would bet on. Solar, I mean it's the fusion reactor in the sky of course, and I think really the problem there is batteries and transmission.

    Demis Hassabis: Future of AI, Simulating Reality, Physics and Video Games | Lex Fridman Podcast #475youtube.com 12th of 20 in this recording

    solarenergy

  13. 2 months earlier
  14. HR

    Hannah Ritchie quoted

    But, China mainly dominates these markets because it has produced a long-term industrial strategy for these technologies and has honed an optimised, modern supply chain as a result.

    Why are solar panels and batteries from China so cheap?sustainabilitybynumbers.com 2nd of 5 in this piece

    solarChina

  15. HR

    Hannah Ritchie quoted

    Another factor that is killing Europe’s competitiveness — not just for batteries but for many industrial products — is the high electricity costs.

    Why are solar panels and batteries from China so cheap?sustainabilitybynumbers.com 3rd of 5 in this piece

    energyEurope

  16. 6 months earlier
  17. CH

    Casey Handmer quoted

    For loads below $1000/kW, intermittent operation with some modest solar array oversizing is the winning strategy. Above $1000/kW, we charge and discharge batteries daily to run them.

    Solar and batteries for generic use casescaseyhandmer.wordpress.com 2nd of 3 in this piece

    solar

  18. CH

    Casey Handmer quoted

    A battery that’s discharging every day gets great utilization, but one that’s only there in case the sun doesn’t come up for two days in a row, barely gets used.

    Solar and batteries for generic use casescaseyhandmer.wordpress.com 3rd of 3 in this piece

    solar

  19. 7 months earlier
  20. AV

    Austin Vernon quoted

    The solar array sizes under these assumptions are prohibitively large.

    How to Make Off Grid Data Centers Affordableaustinvernon.site 1st of 9 in this piece

    solardata centersdesign

  21. AV

    Austin Vernon quoted

    Deleting the UPSs could knock off ~$750/kW after considering equipment, installation, and square footage reduction.

    How to Make Off Grid Data Centers Affordableaustinvernon.site 5th of 9 in this piece

    data centers

  22. 3 months earlier
  23. DW

    Dan Wang quoted

    The foundations of China’s success in EVs were built a decade ago, when the state decided to bet on batteries, and then bought up a lot of the mines for these metals.

    2023 letterdanwang.co 3rd of 10 in this piece

    China

  24. 3 months earlier
  25. CH

    Casey Handmer quoted

    The logical end state of this displacement is not some hybrid grid with around 20% solar backed up by spinning generation, but a much more dynamic, versatile grid with around 200% solar generation and hours to days or weeks of battery storage, fully decoupling time of generation and consumption.

    Radical Energy Abundancecaseyhandmer.wordpress.com 3rd of 7 in this piece

    solarenergy

  26. CH

    Casey Handmer quoted

    we will see batteries aggressively displace transmission as the most cost-effective way to ensure continuity of electricity supply, leading to an eventual pruning of the grid and drastic reduction in the average distance that power travels between production and consumption, even as the average time that power is stored increases.

    Radical Energy Abundancecaseyhandmer.wordpress.com 4th of 7 in this piece

    energy

  27. 5 months earlier
  28. AV

    by

    Austin Vernon quoted

    Ships are great at carrying bulky and heavy stuff with minimal cost and energy usage. We need a battery chemistry that leans into that and sacrifices performance to reduce cost.

    Why Battery Powered Cargo Ships are Compellingaustinvernon.site

    energy

  29. 10 months earlier
  30. BF

    Bjorn Fehrm quoted

    The drone-like architecture of the multicopters is simple, but as the rotors are responsible for keeping the unit at a constant altitude with hover power, they represent an energy-intensive version of VTOLs. Their range is, therefore, short, typically less than 20 miles.

    Bjorn’s Corner: Sustainable Air Transport. Part 27. Multicopters.leehamnews.com 2nd of 2 in this piece

    energy

  31. 15 months earlier
  32. BF

    Bjorn Fehrm quoted

    Having done the sums before hitting the keys, I was a skeptic. It just didn’t work, even with optimistic assumptions around the parameters for the aircraft and its batteries.

    Bjorn’s Corner: The challenges of hydrogen. Part 31. Wrap-up: Where we standleehamnews.com 1st of 3 in this piece