korrents
Casey Handmer

What Casey Handmer thinks about space

@casey-handmer · 81 positions · 2 changes of mind · On ppll ↗

Physicist, formerly at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, and founder of Terraform Industries, which is building plant to make synthetic natural gas from sunlight and air. Writes about energy, space and manufacturing at caseyhandmer.wordpress.com.

Casey Handmer did not write this page.

We collected these quotes from things they published elsewhere, and every quote links to where it was said. They have no account here and have not endorsed this site. Quotes are word for word; the short line under each one is our own restatement, not their wording. Their own site. Is this you? Claim it or ask us to remove it. Or tell us what is wrong here.

24 dated positions, 2019 to 2026, in their own words. Our reading of what Casey Handmer has said — not written or endorsed by them.

  1. Starship promises a near future with launch costs to LEO of perhaps $100/kg.

    ↗How to build a lunar mass drivercaseyhandmer.wordpress.com 1st of 2 in this piece

  2. At even $500/kg, launch cost is only 5% of the total satellite deployment cost, so a lunar mass driver is unlikely to drastically improve the economics of space-based AI, by reducing launch costs.

    ↗How to build a lunar mass drivercaseyhandmer.wordpress.com 2nd of 2 in this piece

  3. 3 months earlier
  4. Today, exploding demand for power-intensive AI applications provides enough of an upside to justify producing components in space, providing the economic engine necessary to justify and fund the trillions of dollars necessary to build and sustain space factories.

    Today, exploding demand for power-intensive AI applications provides enough of an upside to justify producing components in space, providing the economic engine necessary to justify and fund the trillions of dollars necessary to build and sustain space factories.

    ↗Space AI: I guess we’re doing Moon factories nowcaseyhandmer.wordpress.com 1st of 3 in this piece

  5. Starship can lift orbital power generation to about 100 GW with perhaps 10,000 launches per year, or about one per hour.

    ↗Space AI: I guess we’re doing Moon factories nowcaseyhandmer.wordpress.com 3rd of 3 in this piece

  6. 3 months earlier
  7. America

    I am far from certain that NASA can regain anything like the vigor necessary to respond decisively to the Chinese threat, but I am determined that the free people of Earth not live under a Red Moon

    ↗NASA’s Orion Space Capsule Is Flaming Garbagecaseyhandmer.wordpress.com 1st of 4 in this piece

  8. Even for $5.2b per launch, Orion is so overweight that there does not exist a booster nor an upper stage that can launch it to Low Lunar Orbit and return it to Earth.

    ↗NASA’s Orion Space Capsule Is Flaming Garbagecaseyhandmer.wordpress.com 2nd of 4 in this piece

  9. 7 weeks earlier
  10. something like 90% of the complexity and cost of MSR is driven by a requirement that the samples “break the chain” on the way home

    ↗How to get samples back from Marscaseyhandmer.wordpress.com

  11. 4 weeks earlier
  12. one square meter of silicon like like the thickness of a sheet of paper floating in space that's a future human form that's that's my final form

    ↗China is killing the US on energy. Does that mean they’ll win AGI? — Casey Handmeryoutube.com 23rd of 24 in this recording

  13. 2 months earlier
  14. It is clear, however, that today’s NASA is but a shadow of its former self.

    ↗NASA Is Worth Savingcaseyhandmer.wordpress.com 1st of 2 in this piece

  15. I believe NASA is worth saving.

    ↗NASA Is Worth Savingcaseyhandmer.wordpress.com 2nd of 2 in this piece

  16. 6 months earlier
  17. Current PhD students will be nearing retirement by the time these missions fly.

    ↗It Is Time To Build The Monster Scopecaseyhandmer.wordpress.com 2nd of 3 in this piece

  18. The same as JWST, only 150 times wider and 22000 times more sensitive.

    ↗It Is Time To Build The Monster Scopecaseyhandmer.wordpress.com 3rd of 3 in this piece

  19. 8 weeks earlier
  20. Four years on, the program has consumed another $20b with nothing to show for it.

    ↗SLS is still a national disgracecaseyhandmer.wordpress.com 1st of 5 in this piece

  21. SLS, like JWST before it, eats everything in its path, meanwhile NASA hasn’t sent a single mission to Venus since 1989.

    ↗SLS is still a national disgracecaseyhandmer.wordpress.com 3rd of 5 in this piece

  22. optimism

    At the time I was optimistic, now I am not.

    This obviously has not occurred.

    ↗SLS is still a national disgracecaseyhandmer.wordpress.com 4th of 5 in this piece

  23. 10 months earlier
  24. The brief summary is that MSR’s architecture, pictured below, is incredibly complicated, slow, and expensive.

    ↗What is going on with Mars Sample Return?caseyhandmer.wordpress.com

  25. 2 years earlier
  26. At the same time, launch costs drop as low as $50/kg, roughly 100x lower than the present.

    ↗Starship is Still Not Understoodcaseyhandmer.wordpress.com 3rd of 4 in this piece

  27. Either the incumbent space industry adapts to Starship by finding ways to produce much more space hardware for much lower cost, or dozens of other new companies, unbound by tradition, entrenched interests, and high organizational overhead, will permanently take their business.

    ↗Starship is Still Not Understoodcaseyhandmer.wordpress.com 4th of 4 in this piece

  28. 8 months earlier
  29. The required organizational transition is equivalent in scope and difficulty to the Apollo program, and will be made or broken during the tenure of the next NASA administrator.

    ↗SLS: What now?caseyhandmer.wordpress.com

  30. 10 months earlier
  31. Throughout history, space exploration has failed to attract even a weak majority of support among the general electorate, even at the peak of the Apollo program.

    ↗The big question: Why go to space at all?caseyhandmer.wordpress.com

  32. Furthermore, I believe it’s very unlikely that space-based manufacturing or mining could be lucrative enough to fund the venture.

    ↗The big question: Why go to space at all?caseyhandmer.wordpress.com

  33. 8 months earlier
  34. My contention is that there are no known commodity resources in space that could be sold profitably on Earth.

    ↗There are no known commodity resources in space that could be sold on Earthcaseyhandmer.wordpress.com 1st of 2 in this piece

  35. More broadly, for every industrially valuable ore, there is already a competitive and adequate, if not spectacular, supply chain here on Earth.

    ↗There are no known commodity resources in space that could be sold on Earthcaseyhandmer.wordpress.com 2nd of 2 in this piece

  36. 7 days earlier
  37. Communications satellites remain the killer app for the commercial space industry.

    ↗Space-based solar power is not a thingcaseyhandmer.wordpress.com 3rd of 3 in this piece