korrents

Investing

What people on korrents have said about investing, in their own words — 51 claims from 6 people.

Ben Carlson, Ray Dalio, Aswath Damodaran, Morgan Housel, Nick Maggiulli, Howard Marks

Five viewsour reading; the words are theirs

Nobody can tell whether the AI boom is a bubble while it is still inflating I would argue that AI's total addressable market, in the US, cannot be greater than $12.96 trillion, the total employee compensation in 2025 — Aswath Damodaran, 2026 Aswath Damodaran, Howard Marks 12 claims

Claims that a bubble is only visible after it bursts, that today's prices already assume revenues nobody has shown a path to, and that the excess spending is not itself proof of foolishness.

AI’s total addressable market in the United States cannot exceed what American employers pay their employees, about $13 trillion a year.

  1. Aswath Damodaran Professor of finance at NYU’s Stern School of Business I would argue that AI's total addressable market, in the US, cannot be greater than $12.96 trillion, the total employee compensation in 2025 AI’s Bar Mitzvah Moment: From Hype & Hope to Business Questions!aswathdamodaran.blogspot.com · 20 Aug 2026All korrents from this piece
    I would argue that AI's total addressable market, in the US, cannot be greater than $12.96 trillion, the total employee compensation in 2025

Nobody can yet know whether the current enthusiasm for AI is excessive, so anyone claiming conviction about how it resolves is overreaching.

Probabilistic thinking

  1. Aswath Damodaran Professor of finance at NYU’s Stern School of Business anyone who claims to have conviction that they know what's coming is being either ignorant or arrogant AI’s Bar Mitzvah Moment: From Hype & Hope to Business Questions!aswathdamodaran.blogspot.com · 20 Aug 2026All korrents from this piece
    anyone who claims to have conviction that they know what's coming is being either ignorant or arrogant
  2. Howard Marks Co-founder and co-chairman of Oaktree Capital Management Given the vast potential of AI but also the large number of enormous unknowns, I think virtually no one can say for sure. Is It a Bubble?oaktreecapital.com · 9 Dec 2025All korrents from this piece
    Given the vast potential of AI but also the large number of enormous unknowns, I think virtually no one can say for sure.

The trillion-plus prices rumoured for OpenAI and Anthropic ahead of their listings look rich.

  1. Aswath Damodaran Professor of finance at NYU’s Stern School of Business I will confess that the rumored pricing for both companies ($1.5 to $ 2 trillion) looks rich, but I am open to being surprised AI’s Bar Mitzvah Moment: From Hype & Hope to Business Questions!aswathdamodaran.blogspot.com · 20 Aug 2026All korrents from this piece
    I will confess that the rumored pricing for both companies ($1.5 to $ 2 trillion) looks rich, but I am open to being surprised

If AI enthusiasm does not produce a bubble on the historical pattern, it will be the first transformative technology that did not.

  1. Howard Marks Co-founder and co-chairman of Oaktree Capital Management If that enthusiasm doesn’t produce a bubble conforming to the historical pattern, that will be a first. Is It a Bubble?oaktreecapital.com · 9 Dec 2025All korrents from this piece
    If that enthusiasm doesn’t produce a bubble conforming to the historical pattern, that will be a first.

Transformative technologies reliably attract more investment and infrastructure than they need, and that excess is what speeds their adoption.

  1. Howard Marks Co-founder and co-chairman of Oaktree Capital Management There’s a consistent history of transformational technologies generating excessive enthusiasm and investment, resulting in more infrastructure than is needed and asset prices that prove to have been too high. The excesses accelerate the adoption of the technology in a way that wouldn’t occur in their absence. Is It a Bubble?oaktreecapital.com · 9 Dec 2025All korrents from this piece
    There’s a consistent history of transformational technologies generating excessive enthusiasm and investment, resulting in more infrastructure than is needed and asset prices that prove to have been too high. The excesses accelerate the adoption of the technology in a way that wouldn’t occur in their absence.

There is no way to capture a new technology’s upside without being exposed to the losses if the enthusiasm proves excessive.

Trade-offs

  1. Howard Marks Co-founder and co-chairman of Oaktree Capital Management There can be no way to participate fully in the potential benefits from the new technology without being exposed to the losses that will arise if the enthusiasm and thus investors’ behavior prove to have been excessive. Is It a Bubble?oaktreecapital.com · 9 Dec 2025All korrents from this piece
    There can be no way to participate fully in the potential benefits from the new technology without being exposed to the losses that will arise if the enthusiasm and thus investors’ behavior prove to have been excessive.

Leverage in the AI build-out is neither to be applauded nor feared; what matters is how much debt there is and what backs it.

Leverage

  1. Howard Marks Co-founder and co-chairman of Oaktree Capital Management Debt is neither a good thing nor a bad thing per se. Likewise, the use of leverage in the AI industry shouldn’t be applauded or feared. Is It a Bubble?oaktreecapital.com · 9 Dec 2025All korrents from this piece
    Debt is neither a good thing nor a bad thing per se. Likewise, the use of leverage in the AI industry shouldn’t be applauded or feared.

A company priced in the trillions is not thereby overpriced; the test is what revenues and margins that price actually requires.

  1. Aswath Damodaran Professor of finance at NYU’s Stern School of Business If you are an investor who considers any highly priced company to be overvalued, I hope that this post leads you to reconsider. Trillion Dollar Market Caps: Fairy Tale Pricing or Business Marvels?aswathdamodaran.blogspot.com · 3 Dec 2025All korrents from this piece
    If you are an investor who considers any highly priced company to be overvalued, I hope that this post leads you to reconsider.

AI pricing is a big market delusion: each company’s implied revenues look plausible alone, but added together they exceed any market that could exist.

  1. Aswath Damodaran Professor of finance at NYU’s Stern School of Business the delusion comes from the reality that if you aggregated these breakeven revenues across companies, the market is not big enough to sustain all of them Trillion Dollar Market Caps: Fairy Tale Pricing or Business Marvels?aswathdamodaran.blogspot.com · 3 Dec 2025All korrents from this piece
    the delusion comes from the reality that if you aggregated these breakeven revenues across companies, the market is not big enough to sustain all of them

The revenue growth and margins needed to justify Nvidia’s and OpenAI’s late-2025 pricing are improbable.

  1. Aswath Damodaran Professor of finance at NYU’s Stern School of Business I think that the pathway that you would need (in terms of revenue growth and profitability) to justify Nvidia's and OpenAI's current pricing is improbable, but that is just my view Trillion Dollar Market Caps: Fairy Tale Pricing or Business Marvels?aswathdamodaran.blogspot.com · 3 Dec 2025All korrents from this piece
    I think that the pathway that you would need (in terms of revenue growth and profitability) to justify Nvidia's and OpenAI's current pricing is improbable, but that is just my view
A portfolio is something to be held through a cycle, not predicted Stock market concentration is a bull market phenomenon. — Ben Carlson, 2026 Ben Carlson, Nick Maggiulli, Ray Dalio 13 claims · 1 change of mind

Claims that losing money periodically is ordinary, that a call based on the last few years gets the base rate wrong, and that portfolios actually change for reasons in a life rather than reasons in a chart.

The weight of the largest US companies in the index matches their share of the earnings, so the concentration is justified.

  1. Ben Carlson Director of institutional asset management at Ritholtz… The market cap weights make sense relative to the fundamentals. It’s a Concentrated Worldawealthofcommonsense.com · 6 Sept 2026All korrents from this piece
    The market cap weights make sense relative to the fundamentals.

Whatever AI does to the size of the pie, it will most likely increase concentration in the market and the economy.

  1. Ben Carlson Director of institutional asset management at Ritholtz… Even if AI makes the pie grow bigger, it feels like a better bet that it will only increase the level of concentration in the stock market and economy if the past is a good predictor of the future. It’s a Concentrated Worldawealthofcommonsense.com · 6 Sept 2026All korrents from this piece
    Even if AI makes the pie grow bigger, it feels like a better bet that it will only increase the level of concentration in the stock market and economy if the past is a good predictor of the future.

Portfolios get changed because of life events far more often than because of market events.

  1. Ben Carlson Director of institutional asset management at Ritholtz… One of the biggest lessons I’ve learned working in wealth management all these years is that portfolio changes in client accounts happen more frequently from life events rather than market events. How to Invest When Your Portfolio Gets Biggerawealthofcommonsense.com · 3 Sept 2026All korrents from this piece
    One of the biggest lessons I’ve learned working in wealth management all these years is that portfolio changes in client accounts happen more frequently from life events rather than market events.

Saving dominates returns early in a career and returns dominate saving later, because compounding is back-loaded.

Compounding, Exponential growth

  1. Ben Carlson Director of institutional asset management at Ritholtz… How much you save has a far greater impact than your investments early on in your career. But as your portfolio grows, investment returns swamp your savings because of the wonders of compounding. How to Invest When Your Portfolio Gets Biggerawealthofcommonsense.com · 3 Sept 2026All korrents from this piece
    How much you save has a far greater impact than your investments early on in your career. But as your portfolio grows, investment returns swamp your savings because of the wonders of compounding.

Losing money periodically is a normal part of owning stocks, not a sign that something has gone wrong.

  1. Ben Carlson Director of institutional asset management at Ritholtz… Occasional downturns in the stock market are perfectly normal. You have to get used to losing money if you want to survive the stock market. 10 Things You Need to Know About Investing in Stocksawealthofcommonsense.com · 27 Aug 2026All korrents from this piece
    Occasional downturns in the stock market are perfectly normal. You have to get used to losing money if you want to survive the stock market.

There is no average year in the stock market; the long-run average only shows up over a very long horizon.

The map is not the territory, Play long games

  1. Ben Carlson Director of institutional asset management at Ritholtz… There is no such thing as an average experience in the stock market until you’ve been investing for a very long time. 10 Things You Need to Know About Investing in Stocksawealthofcommonsense.com · 27 Aug 2026All korrents from this piece
    There is no such thing as an average experience in the stock market until you’ve been investing for a very long time.

Stock market history is too short to settle much: it holds only three non-overlapping thirty-year periods.

  1. Ben Carlson Director of institutional asset management at Ritholtz… But if you think about this another way, there have only been three non-overlapping 30 year periods in modern stock market history. 10 Things You Need to Know About Investing in Stocksawealthofcommonsense.com · 27 Aug 2026All korrents from this piece
    But if you think about this another way, there have only been three non-overlapping 30 year periods in modern stock market history.

The S&P 500’s price-to-sales ratio no longer signals what it once did, because today’s companies earn higher margins.

  1. Nick Maggiulli Writer of the personal-finance blog Of Dollars And Data… Therefore, the only correct interpretation of the P/S ratio over the last decade is that it doesn’t signal what it used to. Why I Was Wrong to Be Bearish on U.S. Stocksofdollarsanddata.com · 25 Aug 2026All korrents from this piece
    Therefore, the only correct interpretation of the P/S ratio over the last decade is that it doesn’t signal what it used to.

The base rate for US stocks over any one year is that they rise, and forgetting it is how market calls go wrong.

  1. Nick Maggiulli Writer of the personal-finance blog Of Dollars And Data… the base rate for U.S. stock performance (in aggregate) over one year is that they go up Why I Was Wrong to Be Bearish on U.S. Stocksofdollarsanddata.com · 25 Aug 2026All korrents from this piece
    the base rate for U.S. stock performance (in aggregate) over one year is that they go up

A portfolio you cannot hold through an ordinary market cycle is not a portfolio but a bet.

  1. Nick Maggiulli Writer of the personal-finance blog Of Dollars And Data… Because if you can’t handle standard market cycles, then you don’t have a portfolio, you have a bet. Why I Was Wrong to Be Bearish on U.S. Stocksofdollarsanddata.com · 25 Aug 2026All korrents from this piece
    Because if you can’t handle standard market cycles, then you don’t have a portfolio, you have a bet.

An investor's starting point should be the portfolio that is best to hold independent of any tactical market view

  1. Nick Maggiulli Writer of the personal-finance blog Of Dollars And Data… it’s better to have a portfolio that can handle stocks whether they are overvalued or not Why I Was Wrong to Be Bearish on U.S. Stocksofdollarsanddata.com · 25 Aug 2026All korrents from this piece
    it’s better to have a portfolio that can handle stocks whether they are overvalued or not
  2. Ray Dalio Founder of Bridgewater Associates I think everyone’s starting point for investing should be to know and be in the portfolio that is best to have, independent of any tactical views of the markets. Gold is the Safest Moneyraydalio.substack.com · 19 Feb 2026
    I think everyone’s starting point for investing should be to know and be in the portfolio that is best to have, independent of any tactical views of the markets.

The froth visible in US markets in 2025 was the 2021 mania returning, and reason enough to take risk off.

  1. Nick Maggiulli · held 12 months Writer of the personal-finance blog Of Dollars And Data… Since then U.S. stocks are up 16% (total return) and my bearish prediction turned out to be misguided. Why I Was Wrong to Be Bearish on U.S. Stocksofdollarsanddata.com · 25 Aug 2026All korrents from this piece

    Since then U.S. stocks are up 16% (total return) and my bearish prediction turned out to be misguided.

    My issue wasn’t that the parallels didn’t exist—they did. My issue was that much of the speculative stuff of 2021 ended up failing (NFTs, DeFi, etc.) while much of the speculative stuff of 2025 (AI) seems to be succeeding.

Money is a tool for a life, and most people quietly treat it as a scoreboard instead The habituation to novel experiences makes spending money earlier in life more valuable than later in life. — Nick Maggiulli, 2026 Nick Maggiulli, Morgan Housel 13 claims

Claims about what debt, saving and copying a successful person actually buy, and about why market history explains why something happened but never what happens next.

Money spent in your twenties buys more experience than the same money spent in your sixties, because novelty wears off.

  1. Nick Maggiulli Writer of the personal-finance blog Of Dollars And Data… The habituation to novel experiences makes spending money earlier in life more valuable than later in life. Why $100 in Your 20s is Worth $500 in Your 60sofdollarsanddata.com · 4 Aug 2026All korrents from this piece
    The habituation to novel experiences makes spending money earlier in life more valuable than later in life.

Hoarding money you will never spend is a worse mistake than overspending when young.

  1. Nick Maggiulli Writer of the personal-finance blog Of Dollars And Data… Blowing all your money while young isn’t a smart move, but hoarding money now that you won’t spend later is worse. Why $100 in Your 20s is Worth $500 in Your 60sofdollarsanddata.com · 4 Aug 2026All korrents from this piece
    Blowing all your money while young isn’t a smart move, but hoarding money now that you won’t spend later is worse.

Every year spent keeping your options open is a year not spent on whatever you eventually commit to.

Trade-offs

  1. Nick Maggiulli Writer of the personal-finance blog Of Dollars And Data… Every year you spend with options is another year you don’t spend on the thing you eventually commit to. The Problem with Optionalityofdollarsanddata.com · 28 Jul 2026All korrents from this piece
    Every year you spend with options is another year you don’t spend on the thing you eventually commit to.

Refusing to commit is the right strategy inside a portfolio and the wrong one everywhere else in life.

  1. Nick Maggiulli Writer of the personal-finance blog Of Dollars And Data… In investing, non-commitment leads to better than average outcomes for the typical investor. The Problem with Optionalityofdollarsanddata.com · 28 Jul 2026All korrents from this piece
    In investing, non-commitment leads to better than average outcomes for the typical investor.

Cycles are hard to predict because forecasters extrapolate in straight lines and cannot see the forces undoing the present.

  1. Morgan Housel Partner at Collaborative Fund and author of The Psychology of Money Cycles are so hard to predict, because it’s easier to forecast in straight lines. A Few Things I’m Pretty Sure Aboutcollabfund.com · 6 Jan 2026All korrents from this piece
    Cycles are so hard to predict, because it’s easier to forecast in straight lines.

When most people expect a top-five-per-cent outcome, mass disappointment is guaranteed.

  1. Morgan Housel Partner at Collaborative Fund and author of The Psychology of Money But when a majority of people expect a top 5% outcome the result is guaranteed mass disappointment. A Few Things I’m Pretty Sure Aboutcollabfund.com · 6 Jan 2026All korrents from this piece
    But when a majority of people expect a top 5% outcome the result is guaranteed mass disappointment.

Debt is best understood as narrowing the range of outcomes you can survive, not as a cost of capital.

Margin of safety

  1. Morgan Housel Partner at Collaborative Fund and author of The Psychology of Money I think this is the most practical way to think about debt: As debt increases, you narrow the range of outcomes you can endure in life. How I Think About Debtcollabfund.com · 30 Apr 2024All korrents from this piece
    I think this is the most practical way to think about debt: As debt increases, you narrow the range of outcomes you can endure in life.

The real price of debt is paid in options and flexibility, which is the asset that matters most.

Margin of safety, Trade-offs

  1. Morgan Housel Partner at Collaborative Fund and author of The Psychology of Money you start to see it as a constraint on the asset that matters most: having options and flexibility How I Think About Debtcollabfund.com · 30 Apr 2024All korrents from this piece
    you start to see it as a constraint on the asset that matters most: having options and flexibility

When learning from someone successful, copy only what is repeatable; the rest of their success cannot be reproduced.

  1. Morgan Housel Partner at Collaborative Fund and author of The Psychology of Money It’s so important to know the difference between the two when attempting to learn from someone. You want to try to emulate skills that are repeatable. Lucky vs. Repeatablecollabfund.com · 7 Apr 2024All korrents from this piece
    It’s so important to know the difference between the two when attempting to learn from someone. You want to try to emulate skills that are repeatable.

Market history teaches why things behave as they do, never what happens next, because the details never repeat.

  1. Morgan Housel Partner at Collaborative Fund and author of The Psychology of Money you want to learn the big lessons about why things behave the way they do without assuming the past is a direct guide to the future, because it’s not – most of the details are not repeatable Lucky vs. Repeatablecollabfund.com · 7 Apr 2024All korrents from this piece
    you want to learn the big lessons about why things behave the way they do without assuming the past is a direct guide to the future, because it’s not – most of the details are not repeatable

Money is used either as a tool for a better life or as a yardstick of status, and most people aim at the first while chasing the second.

  1. Morgan Housel Partner at Collaborative Fund and author of The Psychology of Money There are two ways to use money. One is as a tool to live a better life. The other is as a yardstick of status to measure yourself against others. A Few Thoughts on Spending Moneycollabfund.com · 31 Jan 2024All korrents from this piece
    There are two ways to use money. One is as a tool to live a better life. The other is as a yardstick of status to measure yourself against others.

Unspent money buys freedom and control over your own time, which is what makes saving worth more than whatever it could have bought.

  1. Morgan Housel Partner at Collaborative Fund and author of The Psychology of Money Unspent money buys something intangible but valuable: freedom, independence, autonomy, and control over your time. A Few Thoughts on Spending Moneycollabfund.com · 31 Jan 2024All korrents from this piece
    Unspent money buys something intangible but valuable: freedom, independence, autonomy, and control over your time.

There is no objective level of wealth: how rich you are is always a judgement made against someone else.

  1. Morgan Housel Partner at Collaborative Fund and author of The Psychology of Money There is no such thing as an objective level of wealth. Everything is relative to someone else. A Few Thoughts on Spending Moneycollabfund.com · 31 Jan 2024All korrents from this piece
    There is no such thing as an objective level of wealth. Everything is relative to someone else.
Whether markets have grown more efficient or less is itself disputed there is evidence that the reversal effect has weakened over time, leaving investors who bet on mean reversion and a return to fundamentals in the lurch — Aswath Damodaran, 2026 Aswath Damodaran 4 claims

One claim that active management collectively subtracts value from investors as a group, another that markets have grown less efficient at long horizons over the same decades -- which, if both hold, means the inefficiency is real and nobody in particular is capturing it.

The pull of fundamentals that used to reverse market momentum has weakened, so betting on mean reversion is more dangerous than it was.

  1. Aswath Damodaran Professor of finance at NYU’s Stern School of Business there is evidence that the reversal effect has weakened over time, leaving investors who bet on mean reversion and a return to fundamentals in the lurch The Scaling and Profitability Trade off: Venture Capital’s Weakest Link!aswathdamodaran.blogspot.com · 2 Sept 2026All korrents from this piece
    there is evidence that the reversal effect has weakened over time, leaving investors who bet on mean reversion and a return to fundamentals in the lurch

The claim that passive investing has made markets less efficient is overwrought.

  1. Aswath Damodaran Professor of finance at NYU’s Stern School of Business Doomsday stories about how passive investing is making markets less efficient and less inclined to reflect fundamentals strike me as overwrought SpaceX, OpenAI and Anthropic: The S&P 500 Inclusion Question and Investment Consequences!aswathdamodaran.blogspot.com · 18 Jun 2026All korrents from this piece
    Doomsday stories about how passive investing is making markets less efficient and less inclined to reflect fundamentals strike me as overwrought

Active investing collectively drags down portfolio returns, and the evidence leaves almost no counter-argument.

  1. Aswath Damodaran Professor of finance at NYU’s Stern School of Business there is almost no counter to the argument that active investing collectively creates a drag on portfolio performance SpaceX, OpenAI and Anthropic: The S&P 500 Inclusion Question and Investment Consequences!aswathdamodaran.blogspot.com · 18 Jun 2026All korrents from this piece
    there is almost no counter to the argument that active investing collectively creates a drag on portfolio performance

Most active investors are not hunting for information; they are betting on mean reversion in data everyone already has.

  1. Aswath Damodaran Professor of finance at NYU’s Stern School of Business Much of active investing is built around publicly available information and a belief in the power of mean reversion, not original research and seeking information. SpaceX, OpenAI and Anthropic: The S&P 500 Inclusion Question and Investment Consequences!aswathdamodaran.blogspot.com · 18 Jun 2026All korrents from this piece
    Much of active investing is built around publicly available information and a belief in the power of mean reversion, not original research and seeking information.
Venture investing's economics do not work the way its reputation suggests Any investor or founder who blindly follows the pathway of scaling first and profiting later for every business is using a cookbook approach to business building, and runs the risk of making small failures into big ones. — Aswath Damodaran, 2026 Aswath Damodaran 5 claims

Claims that a venture capitalist is judged on entry and exit price rather than the business, that the median fund has not beaten a mutual fund, and that governance has been quietly signed away.

Applying scale-first, profit-later to every business is a cookbook that turns small failures into big ones.

  1. Aswath Damodaran Professor of finance at NYU’s Stern School of Business Any investor or founder who blindly follows the pathway of scaling first and profiting later for every business is using a cookbook approach to business building, and runs the risk of making small failures into big ones. The Scaling and Profitability Trade off: Venture Capital’s Weakest Link!aswathdamodaran.blogspot.com · 2 Sept 2026All korrents from this piece
    Any investor or founder who blindly follows the pathway of scaling first and profiting later for every business is using a cookbook approach to business building, and runs the risk of making small failures into big ones.

Venture capitalists are judged on the price they entered and exited at, not on the quality of the business they built.

Incentives

  1. Aswath Damodaran Professor of finance at NYU’s Stern School of Business VC success is measured based on price at entry and price at exit on an investment, rather than the quality of the business built The Scaling and Profitability Trade off: Venture Capital’s Weakest Link!aswathdamodaran.blogspot.com · 2 Sept 2026All korrents from this piece
    VC success is measured based on price at entry and price at exit on an investment, rather than the quality of the business built

The median venture capitalist has produced no more excess return than the median mutual-fund or private-equity manager.

  1. Aswath Damodaran Professor of finance at NYU’s Stern School of Business the median venture capitalist has not been much better at harvesting alpha than the median mutual fund manager or PE investor The Scaling and Profitability Trade off: Venture Capital’s Weakest Link!aswathdamodaran.blogspot.com · 2 Sept 2026All korrents from this piece
    the median venture capitalist has not been much better at harvesting alpha than the median mutual fund manager or PE investor

Companies now go public later, bigger and unprofitable: fewer than a quarter of the last decade’s IPOs were making money.

  1. Aswath Damodaran Professor of finance at NYU’s Stern School of Business While it was routine for companies going public in the 1980s to be profitable (>80% were), less that a quarter of the companies that have gone public in the last decade have been profitable. The Scaling and Profitability Trade off: Venture Capital’s Weakest Link!aswathdamodaran.blogspot.com · 2 Sept 2026All korrents from this piece
    While it was routine for companies going public in the 1980s to be profitable (>80% were), less that a quarter of the companies that have gone public in the last decade have been profitable.

Investors in the largest tech companies have voluntarily surrendered their governance rights, leaving founders with unchecked power.

  1. Aswath Damodaran Professor of finance at NYU’s Stern School of Business investors at many tech companies, including most on the large cap list, have given up their corporate governance rights, often voluntarily (through the acceptance of shares with different voting rights), to founders and top management in these companies Trillion Dollar Market Caps: Fairy Tale Pricing or Business Marvels?aswathdamodaran.blogspot.com · 3 Dec 2025All korrents from this piece
    investors at many tech companies, including most on the large cap list, have given up their corporate governance rights, often voluntarily (through the acceptance of shares with different voting rights), to founders and top management in these companies

Read togetherour reading of the record — ours, not theirs

Money people on the AI build-out and on whether a portfolio is something you build or survive.

What is a view?

Our reading of what a group of claims have in common. Nobody holds a belief about investing as such; people hold beliefs about the handful of live questions the name stands for, and each view is one of them. The claims are printed under it, so the sentence can be checked against them.

Claims are filed here — never people. Somebody is named on a card because a dated claim of theirs sits under it, and somebody whose claims sit under two views is named on both. There are no counts of who believes what: the people under a view are the names printed there.

Read, and under none of the views

On this subject, but saying something the views above do not cover.

Even the most advanced AI cannot be followed blindly in investing, where value added is zero-sum and what is widely known is therefore worth little.

  1. Ray Dalio Founder of Bridgewater Associates I know through my experiences that even the most advanced artificial intelligences don’t have adequate enough insights to allow one to blindly follow them and that unique human understanding and insights are still invaluable, and that that is especially true in investing where value-added is a zero-sum game (so that, when it comes to adding value, what is widely known is of little value.) Principled Thinking and AI Need to Go Togetherraydalio.substack.com · 10 Jun 2026
    I know through my experiences that even the most advanced artificial intelligences don’t have adequate enough insights to allow one to blindly follow them and that unique human understanding and insights are still invaluable, and that that is especially true in investing where value-added is a zero-sum game (so that, when it comes to adding value, what is widely known is of little value.)

Decision criteria have to come from logical cause-and-effect understanding, not from data-mining what worked before, and not from asking an AI what to do.

First principles

  1. Ray Dalio Founder of Bridgewater Associates To be clear, these criteria are not best derived by looking at what would have worked in the past and assuming that it will work in the future—i.e., data mining—or simply asking an AI what to do. They are based on logical understandings converted into decision-making systems. Principled Thinking and AI Need to Go Togetherraydalio.substack.com · 10 Jun 2026
    To be clear, these criteria are not best derived by looking at what would have worked in the past and assuming that it will work in the future—i.e., data mining—or simply asking an AI what to do. They are based on logical understandings converted into decision-making systems.

Systematising principled decision-making with AI is now the line between staying competitive and not; there is no position in between.

  1. Ray Dalio Founder of Bridgewater Associates What this process can now do in creating understanding of the timeless and universal cause:effect relationship and enhancing and systemizing whatever one is thinking is mind-blowing. I believe that you will either stay at the cutting edge of doing this or you will be uncompetitive. Principled Thinking and AI Need to Go Togetherraydalio.substack.com · 10 Jun 2026
    What this process can now do in creating understanding of the timeless and universal cause:effect relationship and enhancing and systemizing whatever one is thinking is mind-blowing. I believe that you will either stay at the cutting edge of doing this or you will be uncompetitive.

Success now requires combining the best human intelligence with the best artificial intelligence

  1. Ray Dalio Founder of Bridgewater Associates I believe that the path to success is best achieved by putting the best human intelligence together with the best artificial intelligence and that the way of thinking I am describing here is essential to understand and use in the new human/artificial intelligence era. Principled Thinking and AI Need to Go Togetherraydalio.substack.com · 10 Jun 2026
    I believe that the path to success is best achieved by putting the best human intelligence together with the best artificial intelligence and that the way of thinking I am describing here is essential to understand and use in the new human/artificial intelligence era.

On this subject, not yet placed

Matched by wording, not yet read into a view. The archive grows on its own — the watcher adds claims every two hours — so this is where new ones wait for somebody to read them.

The stream

The same 167 positions as the timeline, threaded — each on the rail of the view it is filed under, and 147 on no rail yet. Tap a view to follow it.

October 2026

September 2026

August 2026

July 2026

June 2026

May 2026

April 2026

March 2026

February 2026

January 2026

c. 2024–2025

December 2025

October 2025

August 2025

July 2025

June 2025

May 2025

March 2025

January 2025

October 2024

September 2024

August 2024

June 2024

May 2024

April 2024

March 2024

February 2024

June 2023

March 2023

September 2022

August 2022

June 2022

January 2022

August 2021

April 2021

March 2021

January 2021

October 2020

June 2020

February 2020

October 2019

January 2019

October 2018

February 2017

July 2016

February 2014

November 2009

September 2008

c. 1994

The same record, other ways: every position as a chronology, or person by person.