Tap a claim on the ring to put it at the centre.
← Change from already-capable AI is inevitable no matter how the…
17 connected korrents · 18 moments on record from 7 Sept 2008 to 18 Sept 2026.
Everything filed under LLMs
LLMs
Everything filed under AGI
AGI
Everything filed under AI alignment
AI alignment
Everything filed under management
management Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Read this korrent: Change from already-capable AI is inevitable no matter how the frontier is paced, though it will be uneven and not all at once. Change from already-capable AI is inevitable no matter how the frontier is paced, though it will be uneven and not all at once. Last stated today
18 Sept 2026
EM
Ethan Mollick — holds since 2026-09-18 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Economic growth from AI waits on change management, not on model capability: the work artifact and the workflow have to change first. — tap to centre the map on it Economic growth from AI waits on change management, not on model capability: the work artifact and the workflow have to change first. Last stated 10 months ago
12 Nov 2025
SN
Satya Nadella — holds since 2025-11-12 — tap for who they are
Same subject: The current preference cascade on pacing the AI frontier is insufficient to ensure survival. — tap to centre the map on it The current preference cascade on pacing the AI frontier is insufficient to ensure survival. Last stated today
18 Sept 2026
ZM
Zvi Mowshowitz — holds since 2026-09-18 — tap for who they are
Same subject: No one fully understands the consequences of how capable AI is becoming. — tap to centre the map on it No one fully understands the consequences of how capable AI is becoming. Last stated 2 weeks ago
1 Sept 2026
SA
Sam Altman — holds since 2026-09-01 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Human-level AI is most likely centuries or millennia away, so there is no reason to reorganise one's work around its arrival. — tap to centre the map on it Human-level AI is most likely centuries or millennia away, so there is no reason to reorganise one's work around its arrival. Last stated 3 years ago
13 Dec 2023
SA
Scott Aaronson — holds since 2008-09-07 — tap for who they are
SA
Scott Aaronson — no longer holds since 2023-12-13 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Incredibly powerful AI will arrive into a world that is already being transformed and already alarmed, not into a world like today's. — tap to centre the map on it Incredibly powerful AI will arrive into a world that is already being transformed and already alarmed, not into a world like today's. Last stated 9 years ago
24 Feb 2018
PC
Paul Christiano — holds since 2018-02-24 — tap for who they are
Same subject: How you feel about AI succession mostly reflects how good you think the present human situation is — and it is pretty bad. — tap to centre the map on it How you feel about AI succession mostly reflects how good you think the present human situation is — and it is pretty bad. Last stated 12 months ago
26 Sept 2025
RS
Richard Sutton — holds since 2025-09-26 — tap for who they are
Same subject: AI's impact will be bigger than the internet's, and more profound. — tap to centre the map on it AI's impact will be bigger than the internet's, and more profound. Last stated 3 months ago
18 Jun 2026
LT
Lip-Bu Tan — holds since 2026-06-18 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Succession to digital intelligence or to augmented humans is inevitable. — tap to centre the map on it Succession to digital intelligence or to augmented humans is inevitable. Last stated 12 months ago
26 Sept 2025
RS
Richard Sutton — holds since 2025-09-26 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A badly written AI outbound email is evidence of a bad vendor, not of a limit of AI. — tap to centre the map on it A badly written AI outbound email is evidence of a bad vendor, not of a limit of AI. Last stated 9 months ago
1 Jan 2026
JL
Jason Lemkin — holds since 2026-01-01 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A bigger context window does not give you a smarter model; the intelligence of the model is what decides how much of that window it can actually attend to. — tap to centre the map on it A bigger context window does not give you a smarter model; the intelligence of the model is what decides how much of that window it can actually attend to. Last stated 2 months ago
15 Jul 2026
DH
Dex Horthy — holds since 2026-07-15 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A child who has seen ten cats learns what a machine needs the whole internet of cat photos for, by a learning pathway nobody has solved. — tap to centre the map on it A child who has seen ten cats learns what a machine needs the whole internet of cat photos for, by a learning pathway nobody has solved. Last stated a month ago
10 Aug 2026
FL
Fei-Fei Li — holds since 2026-08-10 — tap for who they are
Same subject: The jump from Sol to Astra is larger than from Fable 5 to Fable 5.1, and Astra is the best model for ambitious projects with likely the highest raw intelligence of any model. — tap to centre the map on it The jump from Sol to Astra is larger than from Fable 5 to Fable 5.1, and Astra is the best model for ambitious projects with likely the highest raw intelligence of any model. Last stated 6 days ago
12 Sept 2026
ZM
Zvi Mowshowitz — holds since 2026-09-12 — tap for who they are
Same subject: The LLM line of research will reach a capability plateau. — tap to centre the map on it The LLM line of research will reach a capability plateau. Last stated a month ago
7 Aug 2026
FC
François Chollet — no longer holds since 2026-08-07 — tap for who they are
GM
Gary Marcus — holds since 2025-06-07 — tap for who they are
Same subject: The memorize-fetch-apply paradigm behind LLMs can reach arbitrary skill given training data, but it cannot adapt to novelty or acquire new skills on the fly. — tap to centre the map on it The memorize-fetch-apply paradigm behind LLMs can reach arbitrary skill given training data, but it cannot adapt to novelty or acquire new skills on the fly. Last stated 2 years ago
20 Dec 2024
FC
François Chollet — holds since 2024-12-20 — tap for who they are
FC
François Chollet — no longer holds since 2024-12-20 — tap for who they are
Same subject: An open-weight model is already all anyone needs; it is as good as the frontier models. — tap to centre the map on it An open-weight model is already all anyone needs; it is as good as the frontier models. Last stated 3 weeks ago
26 Aug 2026
DH
David Heinemeier Hansson — no longer holds since 2026-08-26 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Delaying the open release of a new capability by months or years is worth doing, even though preventing its spread indefinitely is not. — tap to centre the map on it Delaying the open release of a new capability by months or years is worth doing, even though preventing its spread indefinitely is not. Last stated a year ago
5 Apr 2025
HT
Helen Toner — holds since 2025-04-05 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Open frontier models will keep being released whether or not anyone wants to stop them, and stopping them would only leave the world less prepared. — tap to centre the map on it Open frontier models will keep being released whether or not anyone wants to stop them, and stopping them would only leave the world less prepared. Last stated 2 years ago
3 Feb 2025
NL
Nathan Lambert — holds since 2025-02-03 — tap for who they are
At the centre
Change from already-capable AI is inevitable no matter how the frontier is paced, though it will be uneven and not all at once.
Holds Read this korrent →
Economic growth from AI waits on change management, not on model capability: the work artifact and the workflow have to change first.
Holds
The current preference cascade on pacing the AI frontier is insufficient to ensure survival.
Holds
No one fully understands the consequences of how capable AI is becoming.
Holds
Human-level AI is most likely centuries or millennia away, so there is no reason to reorganise one's work around its arrival.
No longer holds
Incredibly powerful AI will arrive into a world that is already being transformed and already alarmed, not into a world like today's.
Holds
How you feel about AI succession mostly reflects how good you think the present human situation is — and it is pretty bad.
Holds
AI's impact will be bigger than the internet's, and more profound.
Holds
Succession to digital intelligence or to augmented humans is inevitable.
Holds
A badly written AI outbound email is evidence of a bad vendor, not of a limit of AI.
Holds
A bigger context window does not give you a smarter model; the intelligence of the model is what decides how much of that window it can actually attend to.
Holds
A child who has seen ten cats learns what a machine needs the whole internet of cat photos for, by a learning pathway nobody has solved.
Holds
The jump from Sol to Astra is larger than from Fable 5 to Fable 5.1, and Astra is the best model for ambitious projects with likely the highest raw intelligence of any model.
Holds
The LLM line of research will reach a capability plateau.
Holds No longer holds
The memorize-fetch-apply paradigm behind LLMs can reach arbitrary skill given training data, but it cannot adapt to novelty or acquire new skills on the fly.
No longer holds
An open-weight model is already all anyone needs; it is as good as the frontier models.
No longer holds
Delaying the open release of a new capability by months or years is worth doing, even though preventing its spread indefinitely is not.
Holds
Open frontier models will keep being released whether or not anyone wants to stop them, and stopping them would only leave the world less prepared.
Holds