korrents

← Mental models

Error correction

Nobody and nothing is infallible, so judge a person, a text or an institution by whether it can notice its own mistakes and fix them, not by its claim to be right.

Our reading of the idea · 18 claims from 8 people, in their own words

Sign in to keep a list on your profile.
Filter & sortEveryone, our order18 claims

Good institutions are characterized by strong self-correcting mechanisms

  1. Yuval Noah Harari Israeli historian and philosopher, born in 1976 And in good institutions, they are characterized by having strong self-correcting mechanisms. Yuval Noah Harari: Why advanced societies fall for mass delusion | Big Thinkyoutube.com · 11 Dec 2025 · 29:29 into the videoAll korrents from this video
    And in good institutions, they are characterized by having strong self-correcting mechanisms.

The Bible, through the Ten Commandments, endorses slavery and has no mechanism to correct its text

  1. Yuval Noah Harari Israeli historian and philosopher, born in 1976 The Bible, the 10 Commandments for instance, endorses slavery. Yuval Noah Harari: Why advanced societies fall for mass delusion | Big Thinkyoutube.com · 11 Dec 2025 · 32:12 into the videoAll korrents from this video
    The Bible, the 10 Commandments for instance, endorses slavery.

Liberalism's great advantage is that it is flexible and undogmatic and sustains criticism better than any other order

  1. Yuval Noah Harari Israeli historian and philosopher, born in 1976 Liberalism’s great advantage over other ideologies is that it is flexible and undogmatic. It can sustain criticism better than any other social order. Yuval Noah Harari: the myth of freedom (The Guardian)theguardian.com · 14 Sept 2018All korrents from this piece
    Liberalism’s great advantage over other ideologies is that it is flexible and undogmatic. It can sustain criticism better than any other social order.

The EU has no mechanism for self-correcting its legislative failures

  1. David Heinemeier Hansson Creator of Ruby on Rails, CTO of 37signals the EU has no mechanism for self-correcting its legislative failures Cookie banners show everything that's wrong with the EUworld.hey.com · 5 Aug 2024All korrents from this piece
    the EU has no mechanism for self-correcting its legislative failures

Disbelieving a church ruling on a matter of fact is not heresy, though it may be presumptuous, because on facts that authority is not infallible

  1. Blaise Pascal French mathematician and philosopher (1623 to 1662) And from hence it follows, that while it is heresy to resist the decisions of the faith, because this amounts to an opposing of our own spirit to the Spirit of God, it is no heresy, though it may be an act of presumption, to disbelieve certain particular facts, because this is no more than opposing reason—it may be enlightened reason—to an authority which is great indeed, but in this matter not infallible. The Provincial Letters (tr. Thomas M'Crie, 1856)gutenberg.org · 23 Jan 1657All korrents from this piece
    And from hence it follows, that while it is heresy to resist the decisions of the faith, because this amounts to an opposing of our own spirit to the Spirit of God, it is no heresy, though it may be an act of presumption, to disbelieve certain particular facts, because this is no more than opposing reason—it may be enlightened reason—to an authority which is great indeed, but in this matter not infallible.

There are no ultimate sources of knowledge: every source is welcome, and every source is open to criticism

  1. Karl Popper Austrian-British philosopher of science (1902 to 1994) There are no ultimate sources of knowledge. Every source, every suggestion, is welcome; and every source, every suggestion, is open to critical examination. Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge (Routledge Classics, 2002 edition)books.google.com · c. 1963–1968All korrents from this piece
    There are no ultimate sources of knowledge. Every source, every suggestion, is welcome; and every source, every suggestion, is open to critical examination.

Rationality is the critical attitude: freely discussing theories to find their weak spots so they can be improved

  1. Karl Popper Austrian-British philosopher of science (1902 to 1994) The critical attitude, the tradition of free discussion of theories with the aim of discovering their weak spots so that they may be improved upon, is the attitude of reasonableness, of rationality. Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge (Routledge Classics, 2002 edition)books.google.com · c. 1963–1968All korrents from this piece
    The critical attitude, the tradition of free discussion of theories with the aim of discovering their weak spots so that they may be improved upon, is the attitude of reasonableness, of rationality.

Every genuine test of a theory is an attempt to refute it

  1. Karl Popper Austrian-British philosopher of science (1902 to 1994) Every genuine test of a theory is an attempt to falsify it, or to refute it. Testability is falsifiability Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge (Routledge Classics, 2002 edition)books.google.com · c. 1963–1968All korrents from this piece
    Every genuine test of a theory is an attempt to falsify it, or to refute it. Testability is falsifiability

Conclusions drawn by induction from phenomena stand until new phenomena correct them, whatever hypotheses are imagined against them

  1. Isaac Newton English mathematician and physicist (1642 to 1727) In experimental philosophy we are to look upon propositions collected by general induction from phænomena as accurately or very nearly true, notwithstanding any contrary hypotheses that may be imagined, till such time as other phænomena occur, by which they may either be made more accurate, or liable to exceptions. The Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy, Book III (tr. Andrew Motte, 1729; 1846 edition)en.wikisource.org · c. 1713–1726All korrents from this piece
    In experimental philosophy we are to look upon propositions collected by general induction from phænomena as accurately or very nearly true, notwithstanding any contrary hypotheses that may be imagined, till such time as other phænomena occur, by which they may either be made more accurate, or liable to exceptions.

Publishing a standing list of your own mistakes, and correcting them, is part of doing science honestly.

  1. Stephan Guyenet Obesity researcher with a PhD in neuroscience I make mistakes, and acknowledging and correcting them is an important part of how I grow. Mistakes page for The Hungry Brainstephanguyenet.com · 11 May 2021All korrents from this piece
    I make mistakes, and acknowledging and correcting them is an important part of how I grow.

Large language models cannot reliably self-correct their own mistakes without external feedback.

  1. Lilian Weng Machine-learning researcher this self-correction capability turns out to not exist intrinsically among LLMs and does not easily work out of the box, due to various failure modes Why We Thinklilianweng.github.io · 1 May 2025All korrents from this piece
    this self-correction capability turns out to not exist intrinsically among LLMs and does not easily work out of the box, due to various failure modes

A coding agent does not learn from its mistakes the way a person does -- it repeats the same error indefinitely unless a human notices and writes it down.

  1. Mario Zechner Austrian developer who created the libGDX game framework An agent has no such learning ability. At least not out of the box. It will continue making the same errors over and over again. Depending on the training data it might also come up with glorious new interpolations of different errors. Thoughts on slowing the fuck downmariozechner.at · 25 Mar 2026
    An agent has no such learning ability. At least not out of the box. It will continue making the same errors over and over again. Depending on the training data it might also come up with glorious new interpolations of different errors.

The self-correcting mechanism is the opposite of the holy book: one claims infallibility, the other embraces fallibility

  1. Yuval Noah Harari Israeli historian and philosopher, born in 1976 The holy book is supposed to be infallible. The self-correcting mechanism embraces fallibility. Nexus: A Brief History of Information Networks from the Stone Age to AI (Random House, 2025 paperback edition)books.google.com · c. 2024–2025All korrents from this piece
    The holy book is supposed to be infallible. The self-correcting mechanism embraces fallibility.

Science is a team effort of institutions, which reward skepticism and innovation rather than conformity

  1. Yuval Noah Harari Israeli historian and philosopher, born in 1976 Science is a team effort, relying on institutional collaboration rather than on individual scientists or, say, a single infallible book. Of course, institutions too are prone to error. Scientific institutions are nevertheless different from religious institutions, inasmuch as they reward skepticism and innovation rather than conformity. Nexus: A Brief History of Information Networks from the Stone Age to AI (Random House, 2025 paperback edition)books.google.com · c. 2024–2025All korrents from this piece
    Science is a team effort, relying on institutional collaboration rather than on individual scientists or, say, a single infallible book. Of course, institutions too are prone to error. Scientific institutions are nevertheless different from religious institutions, inasmuch as they reward skepticism and innovation rather than conformity.

Self-correcting mechanisms are everywhere in nature; children learn to walk through them

  1. Yuval Noah Harari Israeli historian and philosopher, born in 1976 Self-correcting mechanisms are ubiquitous in nature. Children learn how to walk thanks to them. Nexus: A Brief History of Information Networks from the Stone Age to AI (Random House, 2025 paperback edition)books.google.com · c. 2024–2025All korrents from this piece
    Self-correcting mechanisms are ubiquitous in nature. Children learn how to walk thanks to them.

Scientific institutions stand out because they admit institutional responsibility for major mistakes and crimes

  1. Yuval Noah Harari Israeli historian and philosopher, born in 1976 Crucially, scientific institutions are willing to admit their institutional responsibility for major mistakes and crimes. Nexus: A Brief History of Information Networks from the Stone Age to AI (Random House, 2025 paperback edition)books.google.com · c. 2024–2025All korrents from this piece
    Crucially, scientific institutions are willing to admit their institutional responsibility for major mistakes and crimes.

Getting at the truth requires investing in costly self-correcting mechanisms, which Silicon Valley thought it was exempt from

  1. Yuval Noah Harari Israeli historian and philosopher, born in 1976 These self-correcting mechanisms are costly, but if you want to get the truth, you must invest in them. Silicon Valley thought it was exempt from this historical rule. Nexus: A Brief History of Information Networks from the Stone Age to AI (Random House, 2025 paperback edition)books.google.com · c. 2024–2025All korrents from this piece
    These self-correcting mechanisms are costly, but if you want to get the truth, you must invest in them. Silicon Valley thought it was exempt from this historical rule.

Our best guard against AI's unforeseeable problems is living institutions that respond to threats as they arise

  1. Yuval Noah Harari Israeli historian and philosopher, born in 1976 To guard against a plethora of unforeseeable problems, our best bet is to create living institutions that can identify and respond to the threats as they arise. Nexus: A Brief History of Information Networks from the Stone Age to AI (Random House, 2025 paperback edition)books.google.com · c. 2024–2025All korrents from this piece
    To guard against a plethora of unforeseeable problems, our best bet is to create living institutions that can identify and respond to the threats as they arise.

More in systems