What Brian Potter thinks about infrastructure
Structural engineer and writer, author of the Construction Physics newsletter, where he takes apart how large physical things — buildings, ships, semiconductor fabs, aeroplanes — actually get made, and why the cost of making them moves the way it does.
Brian Potter did not write this page.
We collected these quotes from things they published elsewhere, and every quote links to where it was said. They have no account here and have not endorsed this site. Quotes are word for word; the short line under each one is our own restatement, not their wording. Their own site. Is this you? Claim it or ask us to remove it. Or tell us what is wrong here.
Filter infrastructure · Newest first
Only Brian Potter on infrastructure. See everyone on infrastructure
2 dated positions, 2024 to 2025, in their own words. Our reading of what Brian Potter has said — not written or endorsed by them.
-
Their wordsCut and cover will sometimes be the best choice from a basic cost-benefit perspective, as will elevated rail, and both are useful to have in the tunnel construction toolbox for that reason.
↗Why we stopped building subways cheaplyworksinprogress.news 2nd of 3 in this piece
- 12 months earlier
-
Their wordsUtility companies see major electrical infrastructure as a long-term investment to be built in response to sustained demand growth.
↗How to Build an AI Data Centerconstruction-physics.com 2nd of 5 in this piece