korrents

measuring intelligence

What it would mean to measure intelligence in a machine, as opposed to measuring how well it does one task it was trained for.

FilterEveryone, all time39 from 26 people
  1. ZM

    Zvi Mowshowitz quoted

    Writes Don't Worry About the Vase

    High performers start out with an edge that motivates more work with increasing returns to scale, then work more and harder than everyone else, and end up acquiring a vast array of related skills as they climb the entire associated tech tree.

    ↗Monthly Roundup #47: October 2026thezvi.substack.com

  2. 4 weeks earlier
  3. CD

    Cory Doctorow quoted

    Science fiction novelist, journalist and activist

    the fact that you can use a statistical lookup table to predict what words someone is going to say doesn't mean you understand them

    ↗Pluralistic: Textured (18 Sep 2026)pluralistic.net 2nd of 3 in this piece

  4. 3 days earlier
  5. PG

    Paul Graham quoted

    Co-founder of Y Combinator and Viaweb

    Someone needs to define the unit, perhaps using a chain of increasingly hard problems, each pair of which can be solved by a single model.

    ↗@paulg on Xx.com

  6. 3 days earlier
  7. ZM

    Zvi Mowshowitz quoted

    The jump from Sol to Astra is larger than the jump from Fable 5 to Fable 5.1. This is a big deal. Astra is the best model for what one would broadly call ‘ambitious projects,’ and likely has the highest raw intelligence factor of any model.

    ↗GPT-6-Astra Can Do Ambitious Thingsthezvi.substack.com

  8. 5 weeks earlier
  9. FC

    François Chollet quoted

    Creator of the Keras deep-learning library and the ARC-AGI benchmark

    LLMsscaling laws

    In the era of base LLM scaling (2022-2024), I believed the LLM line of research would reach a capability plateau (as later seen with base LLMs). In late 2024, after the o3 test-time compute demo, I changed my views: the new models were showing genuine fluid intelligence, and with this new line of work, the LLM line of research could achieve unbounded capability scaling. "There will be no wall."

    In the era of base LLM scaling (2022-2024), I believed the LLM line of research would reach a capability plateau (as later seen with base LLMs). In late 2024, after the o3 test-time compute demo, I changed my views: the new models were showing genuine fluid intelligence, and with this new line of work, the LLM line of research could achieve unbounded capability scaling. "There will be no wall."

    ↗@fchollet on Xx.com

  10. 6 weeks earlier
  11. SC

    Sasha Chapin quoted

    Writer and author of All the Wrong Moves

    The planning part of your mind, the one that generates ambitions and hypothetical situations, is a small part of your overall intelligence.

    ↗Surrender as a non-stupid life strategysashachapin.substack.com 1st of 3 in this piece

  12. 4 weeks earlier
  13. RW

    Robert Wachter quoted

    Professor and chair of the Department of Medicine at UCSF…

    AGI

    Conversely, healthcare may be the industry where AI has the greatest positive impact on the average person - meaning that AI executives should focus more on talking about it, while talking less about insider brass rings like achieving artificial general intelligence (AGI).

    ↗Robert Wachterrobertwachter.substack.com 2nd of 3 in this piece

  14. 2 months earlier
  15. TT

    Terence Tao quoted

    you know, right now we're going through uh an in um an cognitive version of the Copernican revolution where we used to think that human intelligence is the center of the universe. And now we're actually seeing that there's there's very different types of intelligence um that that that are out there uh with very different strengths and weaknesses.

    ↗Terence Tao – How the world’s top mathematician uses AIyoutube.com 4th of 24 in this recording

  16. 5 weeks earlier
  17. DA

    Dario Amodei quoted

    Co-founder and CEO of Anthropic

    My one little bit, the one little bit of of fundamental uncertainty even on long time scales is this thing about tasks that aren't verifiable. Like, planning a mission to Mars, like, uh you know, doing some fundamental scientific discovery like like CRISPR, like, you know, writing a writing a novel. Hard to hard to verify those tasks.

    ↗Dario Amodei — “We are near the end of the exponential”youtube.com 5th of 29 in this recording

  18. 3 months earlier
  19. IS

    Ilya Sutskever quoted

    Co-founder and chief scientist of Safe Superintelligence Inc.

    The models are much more like the first student but even more because then we say okay so the model should be good at competitive programming so let's get every single competitive programming problem ever and then let's do some data augmentation so we have even more competitive programming problems

    ↗Ilya Sutskever – We're moving from the age of scaling to the age of researchyoutube.com 2nd of 28 in this recording

  20. IS

    Ilya Sutskever quoted

    The thing which I think is the most fundamental is that these models somehow just generalize dramatically worse than people.

    ↗Ilya Sutskever – We're moving from the age of scaling to the age of researchyoutube.com 8th of 28 in this recording

  21. 8 weeks earlier
  22. SF

    Sadayuki Furuhashi quoted

    Author of the open source projects MessagePack

    AGI

    AIが解ける問題を考えて解けるような仕組みを考えないといけないところがAGIに達してない感あるなぁ。AIに「お前が解ける問題を述べよ」と言ったら出てくるようにして欲しい

    ↗@frsyuki on Xx.com

  23. 7 days earlier
  24. RS

    Richard Sutton quoted

    Computer scientist who founded the field of reinforcement learning

    Why are you trying to distinguish humans? Humans are animals. What we have in common is more interesting. What distinguishes us, we should be paying less attention to.

    ↗Richard Sutton – Father of RL thinks LLMs are a dead endyoutube.com 1st of 25 in this recording

  25. RS

    Richard Sutton quoted

    For me, having a goal is the essence of intelligence

    ↗Richard Sutton – Father of RL thinks LLMs are a dead endyoutube.com 5th of 25 in this recording

  26. RS

    Richard Sutton quoted

    if we understood a squirrel I think we'd have a we'd be almost all the way there to understanding human intelligence. The the language part is just a a small veneer on the surface.

    ↗Richard Sutton – Father of RL thinks LLMs are a dead endyoutube.com 11th of 25 in this recording

  27. 8 days earlier
  28. TL

    Tobias Lütke quoted

    Co-founder and CEO of Shopify

    And you know what no sci-fi author dared to predict is that the Turing tests just passes by.

    ↗ACQ2: How to Live in Everyone Else's Future (with Shopify CEO Tobi Lütke)youtube.com 4th of 21 in this recording

  29. 7 weeks earlier
  30. AG

    Alexey Guzey quoted

    Writer and founder of New Science

    LLMsOpenAI

    It’s become very difficult for me to maintain the belief in the stupidity of ChatGPT when every time I laugh at it, it ends up ridiculing me 6 months later.

    First, I’m now convinced that ChatGPT understands what it reads.

    ↗Why I believe in AGI (again)guzey.com

  31. 5 days earlier
  32. JG

    James Gleick quoted

    Author and journalist, born in New York City in 1954

    The Turing test is done. We’ve proven that we can be fooled.

    ↗The Parrot in the Machinearound.com 4th of 4 in this piece

  33. 6 weeks earlier
  34. SH

    Samuel Hammond quoted

    Senior economist at the Foundation for American Innovation

    AGI

    It follows that a true AGI with full, human-level autonomy is inconceivable in the Kantian sense without also gaining our recognition as a moral subject.

    ↗Do LLMs really reason?secondbest.ca 3rd of 3 in this piece

  35. 4 months earlier
  36. NL

    Nathan Lambert quoted

    Machine-learning researcher on open language models

    AGILLMs

    I think my personal definition of AGI is much simpler. I think language models are a form of AGI and all of this super powerful stuff is a next step that's great if we get these tools. But a language model has so much value in so many domains that it's a general intelligence to me.

    ↗DeepSeek, China, OpenAI, NVIDIA, xAI, TSMC, Stargate, and AI Megaclusters | Lex Fridman Podcast #459youtube.com 8th of 44 in this recording

  37. 6 weeks earlier
  38. FC

    François Chollet quoted

    LLMs

    This "memorize, fetch, apply" paradigm can achieve arbitrary levels of skills at arbitrary tasks given appropriate training data, but it cannot adapt to novelty or pick up new skills on the fly (which is to say that there is no fluid intelligence at play here.)

    ↗OpenAI o3 Breakthrough High Score on ARC-AGI-Pubarcprize.org

  39. 4 months earlier
  40. AG

    Alexey Guzey quoted

    AGILLMsneural networks

    This means that working on neural networks is NOT getting us closer to AGI, except indirectly.

    ↗How my views on AI changed every year 2017-2024guzey.com

  41. 4 months earlier
  42. SC

    Sean Carroll quoted

    Theoretical physicist at Johns Hopkins University

    And rather than trying to ask, how close is it to being a human-like intelligent, we should appreciate it for what its capabilities are, and that will both be more accurate and help us put it to work and protect us from the dangers better rather than always anthropomorphizing it.

    ↗Sean Carroll: General Relativity, Quantum Mechanics, Black Holes & Aliens | Lex Fridman Podcast #428youtube.com 12th of 20 in this recording

  43. 5 months earlier
  44. EM

    Elon Musk quoted

    Founded SpaceX in 2002

    physics

    If an AI cannot figure out new physics, it’s clearly not equal to humans, nor has surpassed humans because humans have figured out new physics.

    ↗Elon Musk: War, AI, Aliens, Politics, Physics, Video Games, and Humanity | Lex Fridman Podcast #400youtube.com 11th of 23 in this recording

  45. 4 months earlier
  46. GH

    George Hotz quoted

    American programmer and hacker

    The problem is if you go back to 1960 and you tell them that you have a machine that can play amazing chess, of course someone in 1960 will tell you that machine is intelligent. Someone in 2010 won’t. What’s changed? Today, we think that these machines that have language are intelligent, but I think in 20 years we’re going to be like, yeah, but can it reproduce?

    ↗George Hotz: Tiny Corp, Twitter, AI Safety, Self-Driving, GPT, AGI & God | Lex Fridman Podcast #387youtube.com 11th of 30 in this recording

  47. 2 years earlier
  48. GW

    Gwern quoted

    Pseudonymous essayist

    human intelligence's g is real but is the overall 'pool' of neural resources which derives from overall body integrity because the number of neurons, their density, their myelination, resistance to damage and infection etc, is causally downstream of all body and developmental systems, creating a huge mutational target

    ↗May 2021 Gwern.net Newslettergwern.substack.com 3rd of 3 in this piece

  49. 11 months earlier
  50. MH

    Max Hodak quoted

    Co-founder and chief executive of Science

    AGI

    Over the last few years I have gone from an AGI skeptic to being significantly worried about just how soon it will likely come to exist and how dramatically it will reshape the world.

    Over the last few years I have gone from an AGI skeptic to being significantly worried about just how soon it will likely come to exist and how dramatically it will reshape the world.

    ↗Artificial intelligence will be here soonmaxhodak.com

  51. 7 weeks earlier
  52. DA

    Dario Amodei quoted

    By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which current NLP systems still largely struggle to do.

    ↗Language models are few-shot learners (with 30 co-authors)arxiv.org All 3 from this paper

  53. DA

    Dario Amodei quoted

    Ultimately, however, one-shot, or even sometimes zero-shot, seem like the fairest comparisons to human performance, and are important targets for future work.

    ↗Language models are few-shot learners (with 30 co-authors)arxiv.org All 3 from this paper

  54. 7 months earlier
  55. FC

    François Chollet quoted

    To make deliberate progress towards more intelligent and more human-like artificial systems, we need to be following an appropriate feedback signal: we need to be able to define and evaluate intelligence in a way that enables comparisons between two systems, as well as comparisons with humans.

    ↗On the Measure of Intelligencearxiv.org All 5 from this paper