Tap a claim on the ring to put it at the centre.
← A new technology is judged against perfection rather than against the…
17 connected korrents · 18 moments on record from 24 Oct 2017 to 4 Sept 2026.
Everything filed under AI alignment
AI alignment
Everything filed under market efficiency
market efficiency
Everything filed under OpenAI
OpenAI
Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject
Read this korrent: A new technology is judged against perfection rather than against the thing it would replace, which is why it always comes up short.
A new technology is judged against perfection rather than against the thing it would replace, which is why it always comes up short.
Last stated 2 months ago
20 Jul 2026
PB
Paul Bloom — holds since 2026-07-20 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Technologies are almost always preceded by slightly worse versions of themselves, and there is no reason for AI to be the exception. — tap to centre the map on it
Technologies are almost always preceded by slightly worse versions of themselves, and there is no reason for AI to be the exception.
Last stated 9 years ago
24 Feb 2018
PC
Paul Christiano — holds since 2018-02-24 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Technological determinism is only believable low down the tech tree; higher up we already choose which paths not to take. — tap to centre the map on it
Technological determinism is only believable low down the tech tree; higher up we already choose which paths not to take.
Last stated 5 months ago
7 Apr 2026
MN
Michael Nielsen — holds since 2026-04-07 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Because we do not have good alignment technology, we are choosing to build an alien mind with its own values and gamble on it instead of building a tool. — tap to centre the map on it
Because we do not have good alignment technology, we are choosing to build an alien mind with its own values and gamble on it instead of building a tool.
Last stated 4 weeks ago
11 Aug 2026
RG
Ryan Greenblatt — holds since 2026-08-11 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A model can produce version two of a product that already exists, but the genuinely new version one still has to be made by people. — tap to centre the map on it
A model can produce version two of a product that already exists, but the genuinely new version one still has to be made by people.
Last stated 3 months ago
7 Jun 2026
TF
Tony Fadell — holds since 2026-06-07 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Expecting technology to keep accelerating is a bias of our particular moment; for most of human history the tools did not change at all. — tap to centre the map on it
Expecting technology to keep accelerating is a bias of our particular moment; for most of human history the tools did not change at all.
Last stated 2 years ago
22 Dec 2024
AF
Adam Frank — holds since 2024-12-22 — tap for who they are
Same subject: The genuinely new idea in a product will probably fail; its job is to give people a reason to try the product at all. — tap to centre the map on it
The genuinely new idea in a product will probably fail; its job is to give people a reason to try the product at all.
Last stated 3 months ago
14 Jun 2026
MP
Mark Pincus — holds since 2026-06-14 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Even the most advanced AI cannot be followed blindly in investing, where value added is zero-sum and what is widely known is therefore worth little. — tap to centre the map on it
Even the most advanced AI cannot be followed blindly in investing, where value added is zero-sum and what is widely known is therefore worth little.
Last stated 3 months ago
10 Jun 2026
RD
Ray Dalio — holds since 2026-06-10 — tap for who they are
Same subject: How you feel about AI succession mostly reflects how good you think the present human situation is — and it is pretty bad. — tap to centre the map on it
How you feel about AI succession mostly reflects how good you think the present human situation is — and it is pretty bad.
Last stated 11 months ago
26 Sept 2025
RS
Richard Sutton — holds since 2025-09-26 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A human being is not an AGI: we lack a huge amount of knowledge and rely on continual learning instead, so continual learning is what superintelligence should mean. — tap to centre the map on it
A human being is not an AGI: we lack a huge amount of knowledge and rely on continual learning instead, so continual learning is what superintelligence should mean.
Last stated 9 months ago
25 Nov 2025
IS
Ilya Sutskever — holds since 2025-11-25 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A saboteur among our AI investigators would be hard to spot, because these models are sloppy and spiky enough that a suspicious error just looks like ordinary incompetence. — tap to centre the map on it
A saboteur among our AI investigators would be hard to spot, because these models are sloppy and spiky enough that a suspicious error just looks like ordinary incompetence.
Last stated a week ago
1 Sept 2026
AC
Ajeya Cotra — holds since 2026-09-01 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A superintelligence needs no consciousness, emotions or malice to be dangerous; a goal system slightly misaligned with ours is enough. — tap to centre the map on it
A superintelligence needs no consciousness, emotions or malice to be dangerous; a goal system slightly misaligned with ours is enough.
Last stated 9 years ago
24 Oct 2017
ÉT
Émile P. Torres — holds since 2017-10-24 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Stocks sustained by persistent online attention can stay overpriced for long periods, so overvaluation alone does not imply a near-term correction. — tap to centre the map on it
Stocks sustained by persistent online attention can stay overpriced for long periods, so overvaluation alone does not imply a near-term correction.
Last stated 4 years ago
25 Jul 2022
NS
Noah Smith — holds since 2022-07-25 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Technology has made markets less efficient at long horizons rather than more efficient. — tap to centre the map on it
Technology has made markets less efficient at long horizons rather than more efficient.
Last stated 2 years ago
3 Sept 2024
CA
Cliff Asness — holds since 2024-09-03 — tap for who they are
Same subject: The efficient market hypothesis is at best a very lossy heuristic — tap to centre the map on it
The efficient market hypothesis is at best a very lossy heuristic
Last stated 4 days ago
4 Sept 2026
NF
Nat Friedman — holds since 2026-09-04 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A startup should not begin life as a nonprofit and bolt a for-profit arm on later, whatever OpenAI's own history suggests. — tap to centre the map on it
A startup should not begin life as a nonprofit and bolt a for-profit arm on later, whatever OpenAI's own history suggests.
Last stated 2 years ago
18 Mar 2024
SA
Sam Altman — holds since 2024-03-18 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A technique that lets an AI model's reasoning shift outside its visible Chain of Thought is dangerous, both because it works and because a leading lab is willing to deploy it. — tap to centre the map on it
A technique that lets an AI model's reasoning shift outside its visible Chain of Thought is dangerous, both because it works and because a leading lab is willing to deploy it.
Last stated 5 days ago
3 Sept 2026
ZM
Zvi Mowshowitz — holds since 2026-09-03 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A tiny language model inventing a plausible-sounding name is the same phenomenon as a large one confidently stating a false fact. — tap to centre the map on it
A tiny language model inventing a plausible-sounding name is the same phenomenon as a large one confidently stating a false fact.
Last stated 7 months ago
12 Feb 2026
AK
Andrej Karpathy — holds since 2026-02-12 — tap for who they are
same subject or similar wording a cloud: claims about one subject, named for it bar: when it was last stated, on a scale from 2015 to today — full is today a face: someone on record holding the claim — tap it for who they are
At the centre
A new technology is judged against perfection rather than against the thing it would replace, which is why it always comes up short.
Last stated 20 Jul 2026 · 2 months ago
Holds PB Paul Bloom
Read this korrent →
Similar wording
Technologies are almost always preceded by slightly worse versions of themselves, and there is no reason for AI to be the exception.
Last stated 24 Feb 2018 · 9 years ago
Holds PC Paul Christiano
Similar wording
Technological determinism is only believable low down the tech tree; higher up we already choose which paths not to take.
Last stated 7 Apr 2026 · 5 months ago
Holds MN Michael Nielsen
Similar wording
Because we do not have good alignment technology, we are choosing to build an alien mind with its own values and gamble on it instead of building a tool.
Last stated 11 Aug 2026 · 4 weeks ago
Holds RG Ryan Greenblatt
Similar wording
A model can produce version two of a product that already exists, but the genuinely new version one still has to be made by people.
Last stated 7 Jun 2026 · 3 months ago
Holds TF Tony Fadell
Similar wording
Expecting technology to keep accelerating is a bias of our particular moment; for most of human history the tools did not change at all.
Last stated 22 Dec 2024 · 2 years ago
Holds AF Adam Frank
Similar wording
The genuinely new idea in a product will probably fail; its job is to give people a reason to try the product at all.
Last stated 14 Jun 2026 · 3 months ago
Holds MP Mark Pincus
Similar wording
Even the most advanced AI cannot be followed blindly in investing, where value added is zero-sum and what is widely known is therefore worth little.
Last stated 10 Jun 2026 · 3 months ago
Holds Ray Dalio
Similar wording
How you feel about AI succession mostly reflects how good you think the present human situation is — and it is pretty bad.
Last stated 26 Sept 2025 · 11 months ago
Holds RS Richard Sutton
Same subject: AI alignment
A human being is not an AGI: we lack a huge amount of knowledge and rely on continual learning instead, so continual learning is what superintelligence should mean.
Last stated 25 Nov 2025 · 9 months ago
Holds IS Ilya Sutskever
Same subject: AI alignment
A saboteur among our AI investigators would be hard to spot, because these models are sloppy and spiky enough that a suspicious error just looks like ordinary incompetence.
Last stated 1 Sept 2026 · a week ago
Holds AC Ajeya Cotra
Same subject: AI alignment
A superintelligence needs no consciousness, emotions or malice to be dangerous; a goal system slightly misaligned with ours is enough.
Last stated 24 Oct 2017 · 9 years ago
Holds ÉT Émile P. Torres
Same subject: market efficiency
Stocks sustained by persistent online attention can stay overpriced for long periods, so overvaluation alone does not imply a near-term correction.
Last stated 25 Jul 2022 · 4 years ago
Holds Noah Smith
Same subject: market efficiency
Technology has made markets less efficient at long horizons rather than more efficient.
Last stated 3 Sept 2024 · 2 years ago
Holds Cliff Asness
Same subject: market efficiency
The efficient market hypothesis is at best a very lossy heuristic
Last stated 4 Sept 2026 · 4 days ago
Holds NF Nat Friedman
Same subject: OpenAI
A startup should not begin life as a nonprofit and bolt a for-profit arm on later, whatever OpenAI's own history suggests.
Last stated 18 Mar 2024 · 2 years ago
Holds Sam Altman
Same subject: OpenAI
A technique that lets an AI model's reasoning shift outside its visible Chain of Thought is dangerous, both because it works and because a leading lab is willing to deploy it.
Last stated 3 Sept 2026 · 5 days ago
Holds ZM Zvi Mowshowitz
Same subject: OpenAI
A tiny language model inventing a plausible-sounding name is the same phenomenon as a large one confidently stating a false fact.
Last stated 12 Feb 2026 · 7 months ago
Holds Andrej Karpathy