korrents
Daniel Kahneman

Daniel Kahneman

@daniel-kahneman · 41 positions · On ppll ↗

Psychologist and Nobel laureate (1934 to 2024); shared the 2002 Nobel memorial prize in economic sciences for integrating psychological research into economics; with Amos Tversky, developed prospect theory and the study of heuristics and biases.

Daniel Kahneman did not write this page.

We collected these quotes from things they published elsewhere, and every quote links to where it was said. They have no account here and have not endorsed this site. Quotes are word for word; the short line under each one is our own restatement, not their wording. Their own site. Is this you? Claim it or ask us to remove it. Or tell us what is wrong here.

8 of Daniel Kahneman's claims fit 3 mental models. Most often: Cognitive biases, Probabilistic thinking, Bottlenecks.

Models we see in what they say

Our reading: their claim applies the idea without naming it. The claim is theirs; filing it here is ours.

Cognitive biases

Your mind jumps to conclusions and defends them; look for the evidence against you and use checklists.

Used by 24 others

Forming an impression very quickly leads to spending the time confirming it rather than collecting evidence, so a wrong first impression is unlikely to be corrected.

  1. Daniel Kahneman Psychologist and Nobel laureate (1934 to 2024) there is the way in which people form impressions very quickly to form an impression and then you spend most of your time confirming it instead of collecting evidence and so if accidentally your impression was in the wrong direction we are going to confirm it and you don't give yourself a chance to correct it Daniel Kahneman | The Knowledge Project #68youtube.com · 12 Oct 2019 · 0:33:10 into the videoAll korrents from this video
    there is the way in which people form impressions very quickly to form an impression and then you spend most of your time confirming it instead of collecting evidence and so if accidentally your impression was in the wrong direction we are going to confirm it and you don't give yourself a chance to correct it

    Watch from 0:33:10 plays here

    ↗Daniel Kahneman | The Knowledge Project #68youtube.com

    12 Oct 2019 · video · 1h 06m · spoken · machine transcript

Strong intuitions that seem clear lack a way of calibrating, which makes people wildly overconfident about what they know and reluctant to accept they may be wrong.

  1. Daniel Kahneman Psychologist and Nobel laureate (1934 to 2024) we have no way of calibrating ourselves so that makes us wildly overconfident about what we know and reluctant to accept that we may be wrong Daniel Kahneman | The Knowledge Project #68youtube.com · 12 Oct 2019 · 1:05:35 into the videoAll korrents from this video
    we have no way of calibrating ourselves so that makes us wildly overconfident about what we know and reluctant to accept that we may be wrong

    Watch from 1:05:35 plays here

    ↗Daniel Kahneman | The Knowledge Project #68youtube.com

    12 Oct 2019 · video · 1h 06m · spoken · machine transcript

A pre-mortem makes it possible to voice doubts when a group is nearing a decision, a point at which dissent is otherwise hard to raise.

  1. Daniel Kahneman Psychologist and Nobel laureate (1934 to 2024) it's beautiful because when people are coming close to a decision it becomes difficult to raise doubts or to raise questions people who are flowing the group down when the group's is nearing a decision a perceivers really you know person I mean you know this you want to get rid of them and the pre-mortem legitimizes that sort of descent and that sort of doubts not only legitimizes that too much rewards it Daniel Kahneman | The Knowledge Project #68youtube.com · 12 Oct 2019 · 0:49:03 into the videoAll korrents from this video
    it's beautiful because when people are coming close to a decision it becomes difficult to raise doubts or to raise questions people who are flowing the group down when the group's is nearing a decision a perceivers really you know person I mean you know this you want to get rid of them and the pre-mortem legitimizes that sort of descent and that sort of doubts not only legitimizes that too much rewards it

    Watch from 0:49:03 plays here

    ↗Daniel Kahneman | The Knowledge Project #68youtube.com

    12 Oct 2019 · video · 1h 06m · spoken · machine transcript

Keeping track of decisions and how they turned out allows later evaluation of the procedures that produced the good and the bad ones.

  1. Daniel Kahneman Psychologist and Nobel laureate (1934 to 2024) I would advise people make a lot of decisions to keep track their decisions and of how they turned out so that later you can come and and evaluate your procedures and and see whether there is anything that is in common with those decision that turned out well and then not so well Daniel Kahneman | The Knowledge Project #68youtube.com · 12 Oct 2019 · 0:54:21 into the videoAll korrents from this video
    I would advise people make a lot of decisions to keep track their decisions and of how they turned out so that later you can come and and evaluate your procedures and and see whether there is anything that is in common with those decision that turned out well and then not so well

    Watch from 0:54:21 plays here

    ↗Daniel Kahneman | The Knowledge Project #68youtube.com

    12 Oct 2019 · video · 1h 06m · spoken · machine transcript

A basic rule for better decisions is to slow down, especially when there is an immediate conviction.

  1. Daniel Kahneman Psychologist and Nobel laureate (1934 to 2024) one basic rule is slow down especially if you if you have the immediate conviction slow down Daniel Kahneman | The Knowledge Project #68youtube.com · 12 Oct 2019 · 0:26:31 into the videoAll korrents from this video
    one basic rule is slow down especially if you if you have the immediate conviction slow down

    Watch from 0:26:31 plays here

    ↗Daniel Kahneman | The Knowledge Project #68youtube.com

    12 Oct 2019 · video · 1h 06m · spoken · machine transcript

Probabilistic thinking

Think in odds, not certainties, and bet heavily only when the odds are clearly yours.

Used by 28 others

The best prediction is always less extreme than the impression it is based on, but intuitive prediction is non-regressive and ignores regression to the mean.

  1. Daniel Kahneman Psychologist and Nobel laureate (1934 to 2024) there is a more subtle error and harder harder to fix but that the best prediction the best guess is always less extreme than your impression intuitive prediction is as we say not progressive it doesn't recognize regression to the mean Daniel Kahneman | The Knowledge Project #68youtube.com · 12 Oct 2019 · 0:41:08 into the videoAll korrents from this video
    there is a more subtle error and harder harder to fix but that the best prediction the best guess is always less extreme than your impression intuitive prediction is as we say not progressive it doesn't recognize regression to the mean

    Watch from 0:41:08 plays here

    ↗Daniel Kahneman | The Knowledge Project #68youtube.com

    12 Oct 2019 · video · 1h 06m · spoken · machine transcript

Predictions should be less extreme than the information they rest on, an idea that is deeply counterintuitive

  1. Daniel Kahneman Psychologist and Nobel laureate (1934 to 2024) As I understood clearly only when I taught statistics some years later, the idea that predictions should be less extreme than the information on which they are based is deeply counterintuitive. Daniel Kahneman – Biographical, Part 2: Eulogy for Amos Tversky (June 5, 1996)nobelprize.org · c. 2002–2003All korrents from this piece
    As I understood clearly only when I taught statistics some years later, the idea that predictions should be less extreme than the information on which they are based is deeply counterintuitive.

Bottlenecks

A system moves only as fast as its narrowest point; speed up anything else and nothing changes.

Used by 90 others

Above a certain level of stable income, emotional well-being seems to be limited by temperament and life circumstances rather than money

  1. Daniel Kahneman Psychologist and Nobel laureate (1934 to 2024) What the data suggest is that above a certain level of stable income, individuals’ emotional well-being is constrained by other factors in their temperament and life circumstances. High income improves evaluation of life but not emotional well-being (with Angus Deaton)pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov · 7 Sept 2010All korrents from this piece
    What the data suggest is that above a certain level of stable income, individuals’ emotional well-being is constrained by other factors in their temperament and life circumstances.