korrents

← Topics

How cheap does solar get, and what does that change?

One number sits under this whole argument: the price of a solar panel falls by a roughly fixed percentage every time the amount installed doubles, and it has been doing that for fifty years. The people on record here agree about the number and disagree about almost everything downstream of it -- what the grid ends up looking like, whether the forecasts are worth making at all, and whether the arithmetic that said none of this could work was wrong or merely early. Two dated forecasts are here, and the person who made the earlier one has already said in public that it was too cautious.

25 dated claims from 6 people · 5 views · 1 change of mind · most recent 3 Sept 2026. Every line below links to the person’s own words.

The views

What is a view?

Our reading of what a group of claims have in common, one level above a korrent: a korrent is our reading of what somebody said, a view is our reading of what several korrents share. The claims are printed under it, so the sentence can be checked against them.

Nobody is filed under a view — claims are. A person is named here because a dated claim of theirs sits under it, and somebody whose claims sit under two views appears under both.

  1. The price falls a fixed amount with every doubling, and it has not stopped

    Paul KrugmanCasey HandmerRamez NaamDavid MacKay

  2. Somebody has put a date on it, which is what makes it checkable

    Casey HandmerPaul KrugmanRamez Naam

  3. The grid stops being a grid once the panels are nearly free

    Casey Handmer

  4. The arithmetic that said it could not work was done before the price fell

    Casey HandmerDavid MacKay

  5. Somebody has to make the panels, and where they are made decides the price

    Noah SmithHannah Ritchie

A viewour reading

The price falls a fixed amount with every doubling, and it has not stopped

5 claims filed here, newest first — each in the words of whoever said it.

The hard-headed realists who wrote America's 2001 energy policy expected renewables to stay trivial, and were wrong by an enormous margin.

  1. Paul Krugman But politics aside, what’s notable about that 2001 report, put together by men who regarded themselves as hard-headed realists, is that it envisaged an energy future reliant almost entirely on fossil fuels plus a bit of nuclear energy. paulkrugman.substack.com

    Trade economist, Nobel laureate in 2008 for his work on…

    But politics aside, what’s notable about that 2001 report, put together by men who regarded themselves as hard-headed realists, is that it envisaged an energy future reliant almost entirely on fossil fuels plus a bit of nuclear energy.

Every doubling of the solar built worldwide has cut its price by 30 to 40 per cent, and that learning rate is why the price keeps falling.

  1. Casey Handmer Per doubling of production, costs have fallen a consistent 30-40% since 1970, but it’s only in the last few years that this price has become competitive with legacy electricity generation caseyhandmer.wordpress.com

    Physicist, formerly at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory

    Per doubling of production, costs have fallen a consistent 30-40% since 1970, but it’s only in the last few years that this price has become competitive with legacy electricity generation
  2. Ramez Naam The data paint an incredible picture: One that shows the price of solar electricity from utility-scale systems dropping by anywhere from 30-40% with each doubling of cumulative solar deployment. rameznaam.com

    Author and clean-energy investor who has been publishing…

    The data paint an incredible picture: One that shows the price of solar electricity from utility-scale systems dropping by anywhere from 30-40% with each doubling of cumulative solar deployment.

Solar has got cheaper faster than even its most optimistic forecasters expected.

  1. Casey Handmer A number of commentators have consistently predicted that solar cost improvements will level out “this year” since about 1990, and yet if anything deployment, cost decline, and the learning rate have only improved. caseyhandmer.wordpress.com

    Physicist, formerly at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory

    A number of commentators have consistently predicted that solar cost improvements will level out “this year” since about 1990, and yet if anything deployment, cost decline, and the learning rate have only improved.
  2. Ramez Naam In short solar prices have dropped faster and lower than almost anyone has expected. rameznaam.com

    Author and clean-energy investor who has been publishing…

    In short solar prices have dropped faster and lower than almost anyone has expected.

Solar's future price should be predicted from how much has been built, not from how much time has passed.

  1. Ramez Naam We can use the last decade to predict the future prices of solar power. Not by looking at the cost of solar as a function of time, but by looking at the cost of solar as a function of cumulative scale of the solar industry. rameznaam.com

    Author and clean-energy investor who has been publishing…

    We can use the last decade to predict the future prices of solar power. Not by looking at the cost of solar as a function of time, but by looking at the cost of solar as a function of cumulative scale of the solar industry.

Photovoltaic panels will keep getting cheaper and less energy-intensive to manufacture over time.

  1. David MacKay I am sure that photovoltaic panels will become ever cheaper; I’m also sure that solar panels will become ever less energy-intensive to manufacture, so their energy yield ratio will improve. inference.org.uk

    Physicist

    I am sure that photovoltaic panels will become ever cheaper; I’m also sure that solar panels will become ever less energy-intensive to manufacture, so their energy yield ratio will improve.

A viewour reading

Somebody has put a date on it, which is what makes it checkable

5 claims filed here, newest first — each in the words of whoever said it.

By 2045 natural gas will be a fuel for aviation, shipping and industrial heat rather than a way of making electricity.

  1. Casey Handmer By 2045, natural gas will be used as LNG primarily for high performance supersonic aviation, shipping, and industrial heat. caseyhandmer.wordpress.com

    Physicist, formerly at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory

    By 2045, natural gas will be used as LNG primarily for high performance supersonic aviation, shipping, and industrial heat.

Renewables now account for the bulk of the growth in electricity generation, whatever their opponents believe.

  1. Paul Krugman there are many people who still refuse to believe that renewables can be practical even as renewables keep growing around the world, in fact accounting for the bulk of growth in electricity generation paulkrugman.substack.com

    Trade economist, Nobel laureate in 2008 for his work on…

    there are many people who still refuse to believe that renewables can be practical even as renewables keep growing around the world, in fact accounting for the bulk of growth in electricity generation

More than 95% of the energy humanity uses will come from solar panels by 2042.

  1. Casey Handmer Following current trends to second order, >95% of humanity’s energy needs will be downstream of solar panels by 2042, just 19 years away, and alongside enormous expansion in direct use of electricity, fuel consumption will grow to more than $25T/year in equivalent dollars. caseyhandmer.wordpress.com

    Physicist, formerly at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory

    Following current trends to second order, >95% of humanity’s energy needs will be downstream of solar panels by 2042, just 19 years away, and alongside enormous expansion in direct use of electricity, fuel consumption will grow to more than $25T/year in equivalent dollars.

Average solar electricity prices in sunny parts of the world will fall to one or two cents per kwh by 2030 or 2035.

  1. Ramez Naam This incredible pace of solar cost decline, with average prices in sunny parts of the world down to a penny or two by 2030 or 2035, is just remarkable. rameznaam.com

    Author and clean-energy investor who has been publishing…

    This incredible pace of solar cost decline, with average prices in sunny parts of the world down to a penny or two by 2030 or 2035, is just remarkable.

After four more doublings of installed solar capacity, solar electricity will cost about 3 cents per kwh in the sunniest areas and 4.5 cents per kwh in moderately sunny areas.

  1. Ramez Naam · held 5 years Both of those forecasts were wrong. Solar has plunged in price faster than anyone – including me – predicted. rameznaam.com

    Author and clean-energy investor who has been publishing…

    Both of those forecasts were wrong. Solar has plunged in price faster than anyone – including me – predicted.

A viewour reading

The grid stops being a grid once the panels are nearly free

6 claims filed here, newest first — each in the words of whoever said it.

Data centres will end up net suppliers of power to their communities, because a solar plant big enough to keep the machines running spills most of what it makes.

  1. Casey Handmer On the flip side, these captive solar power plants will be curtailing approximately 75% of their generated power and will be able to provide net power on all but a few days per year. caseyhandmer.wordpress.com

    Physicist, formerly at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory

    On the flip side, these captive solar power plants will be curtailing approximately 75% of their generated power and will be able to provide net power on all but a few days per year.

Seasonal energy storage is a heat problem rather than a battery problem: electricity is hard to store for months and heat is easy.

  1. Casey Handmer Storing electricity for months is economically difficult, but storing heat is easy. caseyhandmer.wordpress.com

    Physicist, formerly at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory

    Storing electricity for months is economically difficult, but storing heat is easy.

Batteries will replace transmission as the cheapest way to keep the lights on, and the grid will shrink rather than grow.

  1. Casey Handmer · changed Do we need to drastically expand the grid in order to metabolize renewables? No. caseyhandmer.wordpress.com

    Physicist, formerly at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory

    Do we need to drastically expand the grid in order to metabolize renewables? No.

Below about a thousand dollars a kilowatt of capital cost, the right way to run a plant is intermittently on raw solar with no batteries at all.

  1. Casey Handmer For loads below $1000/kW, intermittent operation with some modest solar array oversizing is the winning strategy. Above $1000/kW, we charge and discharge batteries daily to run them. caseyhandmer.wordpress.com

    Physicist, formerly at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory

    For loads below $1000/kW, intermittent operation with some modest solar array oversizing is the winning strategy. Above $1000/kW, we charge and discharge batteries daily to run them.

Past a point it is cheaper to overbuild solar than to add batteries, because a battery kept for the rare bad day is barely used.

  1. Casey Handmer A battery that’s discharging every day gets great utilization, but one that’s only there in case the sun doesn’t come up for two days in a row, barely gets used. caseyhandmer.wordpress.com

    Physicist, formerly at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory

    A battery that’s discharging every day gets great utilization, but one that’s only there in case the sun doesn’t come up for two days in a row, barely gets used.

The end state of the grid is not a fifth solar backed by spinning generation, but twice the demand in solar with days of storage behind it.

  1. Casey Handmer The logical end state of this displacement is not some hybrid grid with around 20% solar backed up by spinning generation, but a much more dynamic, versatile grid with around 200% solar generation and hours to days or weeks of battery storage, fully decoupling time of generation and consumption. caseyhandmer.wordpress.com

    Physicist, formerly at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory

    The logical end state of this displacement is not some hybrid grid with around 20% solar backed up by spinning generation, but a much more dynamic, versatile grid with around 200% solar generation and hours to days or weeks of battery storage, fully decoupling time of generation and consumption.

A viewour reading

The arithmetic that said it could not work was done before the price fell

5 claims filed here, newest first — each in the words of whoever said it.

The United Kingdom is the one rich industrial country that cannot run on solar alone, and it has to build wind at scale instead.

  1. Casey Handmer The only highly populated industrial country unable to trivially meet its electricity and synthetic fuel needs with solar alone is the United Kingdom, due primarily to a high population density and high latitude. caseyhandmer.wordpress.com

    Physicist, formerly at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory

    The only highly populated industrial country unable to trivially meet its electricity and synthetic fuel needs with solar alone is the United Kingdom, due primarily to a high population density and high latitude.

Covering the windiest 10% of Britain with windmills could generate about 20 kWh per day per person, roughly half the energy used driving an average car 50 km a day.

  1. David MacKay if we covered the windiest 10% of the country with windmills (delivering 2 W/m2 ), we would be able to generate 20 kWh/d per person, which is half of the power used by driving an average fossil-fuel car 50 km per day. inference.org.uk

    Physicist

    if we covered the windiest 10% of the country with windmills (delivering 2 W/m2 ), we would be able to generate 20 kWh/d per person, which is half of the power used by driving an average fossil-fuel car 50 km per day.

Wave power is unlikely to play a significant role in solving Britain's sustainable energy problem, though it may suit small remote-island communities.

  1. David MacKay While wave power may be useful for small communities on remote islands, I suspect it can’t play a significant role in the solution to Britain’s sustainable energy problem. inference.org.uk

    Physicist

    While wave power may be useful for small communities on remote islands, I suspect it can’t play a significant role in the solution to Britain’s sustainable energy problem.

Europe cannot meet its energy needs from renewables alone and will need nuclear power, solar power from deserts elsewhere, or both.

  1. David MacKay Just like Britain, Europe can’t live on its own renewables. So if the aim is to get off fossil fuels, Europe needs nuclear power, or solar power in other people’s deserts (as discussed on p179), or both. inference.org.uk

    Physicist

    Just like Britain, Europe can’t live on its own renewables. So if the aim is to get off fossil fuels, Europe needs nuclear power, or solar power in other people’s deserts (as discussed on p179), or both.

A viewour reading

Somebody has to make the panels, and where they are made decides the price

4 claims filed here, newest first — each in the words of whoever said it.

Solar power combined with batteries has surpassed nuclear power as the superior energy technology for most uses.

  1. Noah Smith Because solar has, broadly speaking, won the technological race. Intermittency was the last big problem, and batteries have gotten good and cheap enough to make solar reliable. noahpinion.blog

    Economics writer; author of the Noahpinion newsletter

    Because solar has, broadly speaking, won the technological race. Intermittency was the last big problem, and batteries have gotten good and cheap enough to make solar reliable.

America is missing out on the global electrification revolution, the first major tech shift it has completely whiffed on.

  1. Noah Smith The electric revolution is the first major technological revolution that America has just completely whiffed on. noahpinion.blog

    Economics writer; author of the Noahpinion newsletter

    The electric revolution is the first major technological revolution that America has just completely whiffed on.

Chinese solar panels and batteries are cheap because of automation and a honed supply chain, not because of cheap labour.

  1. Hannah Ritchie But, China mainly dominates these markets because it has produced a long-term industrial strategy for these technologies and has honed an optimised, modern supply chain as a result. sustainabilitybynumbers.com

    Data scientist at Our World in Data and author of Not the End of the World

    But, China mainly dominates these markets because it has produced a long-term industrial strategy for these technologies and has honed an optimised, modern supply chain as a result.

Tariffs on Chinese clean energy reduce the total number of clean-energy jobs, because most of those jobs are in deployment rather than manufacturing.

  1. Hannah Ritchie That’s because most clean energy jobs are in deployment and maintenance rather than manufacturing, and since higher costs slow down the rollout of renewables, increasing prices reduces the total number of people working in clean energy (even if the number working in manufacturing increases). sustainabilitybynumbers.com

    Data scientist at Our World in Data and author of Not the End of the World

    That’s because most clean energy jobs are in deployment and maintenance rather than manufacturing, and since higher costs slow down the rollout of renewables, increasing prices reduces the total number of people working in clean energy (even if the number working in manufacturing increases).

Where the claims collide

Asserted relations, each with the curator’s reason — never computed, because similarity cannot tell agreement from opposition.

MacKay concluded that Britain cannot live on its own renewables at current consumption. Handmer agrees the UK is the hard case and reaches the opposite conclusion: it is the one rich country that cannot do it with solar, and it can do it with wind, at prices he puts as low as $10/MWh. One says the island does not have the resource; the other says it has the wrong plan.

MacKay said Europe cannot live on its own renewables and needs nuclear, desert solar, or both. Handmer expects the end state to be roughly 200% solar generation with hours to weeks of battery storage and no spinning backup at all. Fifteen years and two cost curves separate them, and the thing MacKay held constant -- that storage would stay expensive -- is exactly what Handmer says changed.

MacKay concluded in 2008 that Europe cannot live on its own renewables and needs nuclear power, solar from other people’s deserts, or both. Smith says in 2026 that solar with batteries has won the technological race and passed nuclear for most uses, because storage solved intermittency. Eighteen years separate them and MacKay’s arithmetic was about land and flux rather than cost, so the pair is a tension rather than a refutation -- but it is the most consequential disagreement in this archive about what to build.

Data centres end up net power suppliers only because they are built the way Handmer says high-capex loads should be built: overbuild the array rather than buy batteries for the rare bad day. The spilled 75% that becomes the neighbourhood’s power is that overbuild.

The forecast that almost all of humanity’s energy is downstream of solar panels by 2042 is an extrapolation, and what it extrapolates is the learning rate. If the 30-40% decline per doubling stops, the date goes with it.

Who has changed their mind

  1. Ramez Naam · · held 5 years

    After four more doublings of installed solar capacity, solar electricity will cost about 3 cents per kwh in the sunniest areas and 4.5 cents per kwh in moderately sunny areas.

    from Somebody has put a date on it, which is what makes it checkable to The price falls a fixed amount with every doubling, and it has not stopped

On this topic, not yet placed

Matched by wording, not yet read into a view. The archive grows on its own, so this is where new claims wait for somebody to read them.

The full chronology, with every quote: solar as a timeline · person by person, side by side · all topics · Something wrong? Tell us