korrents

On the map

Tap a claim on the ring to put it at the centre.

← Conflicts of interest in science may be unavoidable, and they are still a bad thing.

9 connected korrents · 7 moments on record from 23 Jun 2019 to 5 Aug 2026.

Everything filed under peer review peer review Same subjectSame subjectSame subjectSame subjectSame subjectSame subjectSame subjectSame subjectSame subject Read this korrent: Conflicts of interest in science may be unavoidable, and they are still a bad thing. Conflicts of interest in science may beunavoidable, and they are still a badthing. Last stated 4 years ago 29 May 2022 SR Stuart Ritchie — holds since 2022-05-29 — tap for who they are Same subject: Scientists treat a political conflict of interest as something to be proud of, which they would never do with any other kind. — tap to centre the map on it Scientists treat a politicalconflict of interest as something tobe proud of, which they would neverdo with any other kind. Last stated 4 years ago 29 May 2022 SR Stuart Ritchie — holds since 2022-05-29 — tap for who they are Same subject: What limits science is how it is funded and organised, not how much money it gets. — tap to centre the map on it What limits science is how it isfunded and organised, not how muchmoney it gets. Last stated 7 years ago 23 Jun 2019 JR José Luis Ricón — holds since 2019-06-23 — tap for who they are Same subject: Science is a strong-link problem: what it amounts to depends on how good the best work is, not on how bad the worst is. — tap to centre the map on it Science is a strong-link problem:what it amounts to depends on howgood the best work is, not on howbad the worst is. Last stated 3 years ago 11 Apr 2023 AM Adam Mastroianni — holds since 2023-04-11 — tap for who they are Same subject: Academia has serious problems, but they are not as catastrophic as they look from outside it. — tap to centre the map on it Academia has serious problems, butthey are not as catastrophic as theylook from outside it. Last stated 7 years ago 15 Aug 2019 AG Alexey Guzey — holds since 2019-08-15 — tap for who they are Same subject: The demands of peer reviewers push scientists into producing bad research. — tap to centre the map on it The demands of peer reviewers pushscientists into producing badresearch. Last stated 4 years ago 13 Dec 2022 AM Adam Mastroianni — holds since 2022-12-13 — tap for who they are Same subject: You can be contrarian and usually right by finding and resolving conflicts between the consensus results of different fields — tap to centre the map on it You can be contrarian and usuallyright by finding and resolvingconflicts between the consensusresults of different fields Last stated a month ago 5 Aug 2026 RH Robin Hanson — holds since 2026-08-05 — tap for who they are Same subject: Fraudulent papers pass peer review routinely, which is direct evidence that peer review does not do the job it is supposed to do. — tap to centre the map on it Fraudulent papers pass peer reviewroutinely, which is direct evidencethat peer review does not do the jobit is supposed to do. Last stated 4 years ago 13 Dec 2022 AM Adam Mastroianni — holds since 2022-12-13 — tap for who they are Same subject: History has a reproducibility problem worse than science’s replication crisis, because hardly anyone ever goes back to the sources to check what a historian claimed they say. — tap to centre the map on it History has a reproducibilityproblem worse than science’sreplication crisis, because hardlyanyone ever goes back to the sourcesto check what a historian claimedthey say. Last stated 3 years ago 29 Aug 2023 AH Anton Howes — holds since 2023-08-29 — tap for who they are Same subject: Needing a reviewer's approval before an idea counts for anything makes scientists worse at thinking, and costs the field its most unusual ideas. — tap to centre the map on it Needing a reviewer's approval beforean idea counts for anything makesscientists worse at thinking, andcosts the field its most unusualideas. Last stated 4 years ago 13 Dec 2022 AM Adam Mastroianni — holds since 2022-12-13 — tap for who they are
same subject or similar wordinga cloud: claims about one subject, named for itbar: when it was last stated, on a scale from 2015 to today — full is todaya face: someone on record holding the claim — tap it for who they are

At the centre Conflicts of interest in science may be unavoidable, and they are still a bad thing. Last stated 29 May 2022 · 4 years ago Holds Stuart Ritchie Read this korrent →