korrents

← Mental models

Hanlon's razor

Do not assume malice where carelessness, ignorance or neglect explain what happened; they usually do.

Our reading of the idea · 7 claims from 2 people, in their own words

Genuine malice exists, but in most interactions stupidity is a far more common explanation than malevolence.

  1. Shane Parrish Founder of Farnam Street (fs.blog) and host of The Knowledge Project podcast This isn’t to say that genuine malice doesn’t exist. Of course, it does. But in most interactions, stupidity is a far more common explanation than malevolence. Hanlon’s Razor: Not Everyone is Out to Get Youfs.blog · 16 Nov 2024All korrents from this piece
    This isn’t to say that genuine malice doesn’t exist. Of course, it does. But in most interactions, stupidity is a far more common explanation than malevolence.

Hanlon's razor is a safeguard against labelling behaviour as malicious when incompetence is the more common cause.

  1. Shane Parrish Founder of Farnam Street (fs.blog) and host of The Knowledge Project podcast Hanlon’s razor is a mental safeguard against the temptation to label behavior as malicious when incompetence is the most common response. Hanlon’s Razor: Not Everyone is Out to Get Youfs.blog · 16 Nov 2024All korrents from this piece
    Hanlon’s razor is a mental safeguard against the temptation to label behavior as malicious when incompetence is the most common response.

Inability or neglect is far more likely than malice to be the cause of a problem someone causes.

  1. Shane Parrish Founder of Farnam Street (fs.blog) and host of The Knowledge Project podcast Inability or neglect is far more likely to be the cause than malice. Hanlon’s Razor: Not Everyone is Out to Get Youfs.blog · 16 Nov 2024All korrents from this piece
    Inability or neglect is far more likely to be the cause than malice.

Failures are more often explained by time pressure than by stupidity or malice.

  1. Fabien Sanglard Programmer and writer known for detailed source code… Never attribute to malice what you can attribute to stupidity. And never attribute to stupidity what you can attribute to time pressure. Quake Shareware, a CD-ROM just a little too fullfabiensanglard.net · 17 Aug 2026All korrents from this piece
    Never attribute to malice what you can attribute to stupidity. And never attribute to stupidity what you can attribute to time pressure.

Assuming stupidity rather than malice changes the response: empathy and clarity instead of defensiveness.

  1. Shane Parrish Founder of Farnam Street (fs.blog) and host of The Knowledge Project podcast When we assume stupidity rather than malice, we respond differently. Instead of getting defensive or lashing out, we approach the situation with empathy and clarity. Hanlon’s Razor: Not Everyone is Out to Get Youfs.blog · 16 Nov 2024All korrents from this piece
    When we assume stupidity rather than malice, we respond differently. Instead of getting defensive or lashing out, we approach the situation with empathy and clarity.

The more someone is disliked, the more likely their actions are to be attributed to malice.

  1. Shane Parrish Founder of Farnam Street (fs.blog) and host of The Knowledge Project podcast The more we dislike someone or something, the more likely we are to attribute their actions to malice. Hanlon’s Razor: Not Everyone is Out to Get Youfs.blog · 16 Nov 2024All korrents from this piece
    The more we dislike someone or something, the more likely we are to attribute their actions to malice.

The default should be to assume no malice and forgive, but where malice is confirmed, to be ruthless.

  1. Shane Parrish Founder of Farnam Street (fs.blog) and host of The Knowledge Project podcast The default is to assume no malice and forgive everything. But if malice is confirmed, be ruthless. Hanlon’s Razor: Not Everyone is Out to Get Youfs.blog · 16 Nov 2024All korrents from this piece
    The default is to assume no malice and forgive everything. But if malice is confirmed, be ruthless.

More in general thinking