korrents

On the map

Tap a claim on the ring to put it at the centre.

← Getting the science wrong in a bestselling health book does real harm to the people who follow it.

7 connected korrents · 5 moments on record from 3 Jul 2018 to 29 Aug 2023.

Everything filed under peer review peer review Same subjectSame subjectSame subjectSame subjectSame subjectSame subjectSame subject Read this korrent: Getting the science wrong in a bestselling health book does real harm to the people who follow it. Getting the science wrong in a bestsellinghealth book does real harm to the peoplewho follow it. Last stated 7 years ago 15 Nov 2019 AG Alexey Guzey — holds since 2019-11-15 — tap for who they are Same subject: Recommending a diet to the public before the science behind it is settled is the same mistake the USDA made with low-fat advice in the 1980s. — tap to centre the map on it Recommending a diet to the publicbefore the science behind it issettled is the same mistake the USDAmade with low-fat advice in the1980s. Last stated 8 years ago 3 Jul 2018 SG Stephan Guyenet — holds since 2018-07-03 — tap for who they are Same subject: A celebrated popular science book can consistently misrepresent the literature it summarises and contradict its own sources. — tap to centre the map on it A celebrated popular science bookcan consistently misrepresent theliterature it summarises andcontradict its own sources. Last stated 7 years ago 15 Nov 2019 AG Alexey Guzey — holds since 2019-11-15 — tap for who they are Same subject: A scientific paper should not be built around a take-home message, because that invites cherry-picking and hiding the results that did not fit. — tap to centre the map on it A scientific paper should not bebuilt around a take-home message,because that invites cherry-pickingand hiding the results that did notfit. Last stated 4 years ago 27 Dec 2022 SR Stuart Ritchie — holds since 2022-12-27 — tap for who they are Same subject: The demands of peer reviewers push scientists into producing bad research. — tap to centre the map on it The demands of peer reviewers pushscientists into producing badresearch. Last stated 4 years ago 13 Dec 2022 AM Adam Mastroianni — holds since 2022-12-13 — tap for who they are Same subject: Fraudulent papers pass peer review routinely, which is direct evidence that peer review does not do the job it is supposed to do. — tap to centre the map on it Fraudulent papers pass peer reviewroutinely, which is direct evidencethat peer review does not do the jobit is supposed to do. Last stated 4 years ago 13 Dec 2022 AM Adam Mastroianni — holds since 2022-12-13 — tap for who they are Same subject: History has a reproducibility problem worse than science’s replication crisis, because hardly anyone ever goes back to the sources to check what a historian claimed they say. — tap to centre the map on it History has a reproducibilityproblem worse than science’sreplication crisis, because hardlyanyone ever goes back to the sourcesto check what a historian claimedthey say. Last stated 3 years ago 29 Aug 2023 AH Anton Howes — holds since 2023-08-29 — tap for who they are Same subject: Needing a reviewer's approval before an idea counts for anything makes scientists worse at thinking, and costs the field its most unusual ideas. — tap to centre the map on it Needing a reviewer's approval beforean idea counts for anything makesscientists worse at thinking, andcosts the field its most unusualideas. Last stated 4 years ago 13 Dec 2022 AM Adam Mastroianni — holds since 2022-12-13 — tap for who they are
same subject or similar wordinga cloud: claims about one subject, named for itbar: when it was last stated, on a scale from 2015 to today — full is todaya face: someone on record holding the claim — tap it for who they are

At the centre Getting the science wrong in a bestselling health book does real harm to the people who follow it. Last stated 15 Nov 2019 · 7 years ago Holds Alexey Guzey Read this korrent →