Tap a claim on the ring to put it at the centre.
← Comparing randomised trials of cash against NGOs’ own claims for their programmes is not a fair comparison.
17 connected korrents · 15 moments from 30 Aug 2005 to 30 Jun 2026.
Everything filed under metascience
metascience
Everything filed under TypeScript
TypeScript
Everything filed under benchmarks
benchmarks
Everything filed under EMDR
EMDR
Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject
Read this korrent: Comparing randomised trials of cash against NGOs’ own claims for their programmes is not a fair comparison.
Comparing randomised trials of cash against NGOs’ own claims for their programmes is not a fair comparison.
Last stated 13 years ago
14 Mar 2014
CB
Chris Blattman — holds since 2014-03-14 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Many aid programmes will beat cash on cost-effectiveness, and the ones that do will be those that fix a market failure or a supply problem. — tap to centre the map on it
Many aid programmes will beat cash on cost-effectiveness, and the ones that do will be those that fix a market failure or a supply problem.
Last stated 13 years ago
14 Mar 2014
CB
Chris Blattman — holds since 2014-03-14 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Some aid programmes will beat cash at solving a specific problem, but few will beat it at simply making poor people less poor. — tap to centre the map on it
Some aid programmes will beat cash at solving a specific problem, but few will beat it at simply making poor people less poor.
Last stated 13 years ago
14 Mar 2014
CB
Chris Blattman — holds since 2014-03-14 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Judging aid programmes against each other on cost-effectiveness is the right standard, even when it counts against the programme you champion. — tap to centre the map on it
Judging aid programmes against each other on cost-effectiveness is the right standard, even when it counts against the programme you champion.
Last stated 13 years ago
14 Mar 2014
CB
Chris Blattman — holds since 2014-03-14 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Give where there is strong evidence that donations do a lot of good, rather than where weak evidence suggests they might do far more. — tap to centre the map on it
Give where there is strong evidence that donations do a lot of good, rather than where weak evidence suggests they might do far more.
Last stated 15 years ago
18 Aug 2011
HK
Holden Karnofsky — holds since 2011-08-18 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A therapy is only shown to be more effective if it is compared against another treatment intended to help, not against a control nobody expected to work. — tap to centre the map on it
A therapy is only shown to be more effective if it is compared against another treatment intended to help, not against a control nobody expected to work.
Last stated 2 years ago
11 Sept 2024
SM
Scott D. Miller — holds since 2024-09-11 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Large replication projects answer the wrong question, because most individual studies do not matter either way. — tap to centre the map on it
Large replication projects answer the wrong question, because most individual studies do not matter either way.
Last stated 4 years ago
11 Apr 2023
AM
Adam Mastroianni — holds since 2023-04-11 — tap for who they are
Same subject: There is no correct heuristic for science, so what you need is many independent research programmes each running its own bias. — tap to centre the map on it
There is no correct heuristic for science, so what you need is many independent research programmes each running its own bias.
Last stated 4 months ago
30 Jun 2026
GS
Grant Sanderson — holds since 2026-06-30 — tap for who they are
Same subject: The case for giving poor people cash is not that it is a cure, but that it is less bad than most of what aid already does. — tap to centre the map on it
The case for giving poor people cash is not that it is a cure, but that it is less bad than most of what aid already does.
Last stated 13 years ago
27 Jun 2013
CB
Chris Blattman — holds since 2013-06-27 — tap for who they are
Same subject: “Trust science” is a confused instruction: what deserves trust is the process, not any particular thing it has concluded so far. — tap to centre the map on it
“Trust science” is a confused instruction: what deserves trust is the process, not any particular thing it has concluded so far.
Last stated 3 years ago
16 Aug 2023
JC
Jason Crawford — holds since 2023-08-16 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A hotter field with more teams racing on the same question produces less reliable findings, not more. — tap to centre the map on it
A hotter field with more teams racing on the same question produces less reliable findings, not more.
Last stated 21 years ago
30 Aug 2005
JI
John Ioannidis — holds since 2005-08-30 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A hyped effect shrinking to a small but real one as the studies improve is a sign that a field is working, not failing. — tap to centre the map on it
A hyped effect shrinking to a small but real one as the studies improve is a sign that a field is working, not failing.
Last stated 4 years ago
11 Oct 2022
SR
Stuart Ritchie — holds since 2022-10-11 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Economics journals have made large datasets and heavy statistics the price of making any causal claim at all, which has squeezed qualitative economic history out of the field. — tap to centre the map on it
Economics journals have made large datasets and heavy statistics the price of making any causal claim at all, which has squeezed qualitative economic history out of the field.
Last stated a year ago
13 Oct 2025
AH
Anton Howes — holds since 2025-10-13 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Fraudulent papers pass peer review routinely, which is direct evidence that peer review does not do the job it is supposed to do. — tap to centre the map on it
Fraudulent papers pass peer review routinely, which is direct evidence that peer review does not do the job it is supposed to do.
Last stated 4 years ago
13 Dec 2022
AM
Adam Mastroianni — holds since 2022-12-13 — tap for who they are
Same subject: History has a reproducibility problem worse than science’s replication crisis, because hardly anyone ever goes back to the sources to check what a historian claimed they say. — tap to centre the map on it
History has a reproducibility problem worse than science’s replication crisis, because hardly anyone ever goes back to the sources to check what a historian claimed they say.
Last stated 3 years ago
29 Aug 2023
AH
Anton Howes — holds since 2023-08-29 — tap for who they are
Same subject: The most-cited study showing that language design affects software quality rests on misclassified repositories. — tap to centre the map on it
The most-cited study showing that language design affects software quality rests on misclassified repositories.
Last stated 12 years ago
7 Nov 2014
DL
Dan Luu — holds since 2014-11-07 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A programming language functions as a lens that shapes how a problem is perceived when solving it. — tap to centre the map on it
A programming language functions as a lens that shapes how a problem is perceived when solving it.
Last stated 8 years ago
9 Apr 2019
TB
Thorsten Ball — holds since 2019-04-09 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A programming language is a ten-year play: version one has issues, version two fixes them, version three is finally good — and only then does adoption start. — tap to centre the map on it
A programming language is a ten-year play: version one has issues, version two fixes them, version three is finally good — and only then does adoption start.
Last stated 5 months ago
13 May 2026
AH
Anders Hejlsberg — holds since 2026-05-13 — tap for who they are
same subject or similar wording a cloud: claims about one subject, named for it bar: when it was last stated, on a scale from 2005 to today (stretched back to the oldest claim here) — full is today a face: someone who holds the claim — tap it for who they are
At the centre
Comparing randomised trials of cash against NGOs’ own claims for their programmes is not a fair comparison.
Last stated 14 Mar 2014 · 13 years ago
Holds Chris Blattman
Read this korrent →
Similar wording
Many aid programmes will beat cash on cost-effectiveness, and the ones that do will be those that fix a market failure or a supply problem.
Last stated 14 Mar 2014 · 13 years ago
Holds Chris Blattman
Similar wording
Some aid programmes will beat cash at solving a specific problem, but few will beat it at simply making poor people less poor.
Last stated 14 Mar 2014 · 13 years ago
Holds Chris Blattman
Similar wording
Judging aid programmes against each other on cost-effectiveness is the right standard, even when it counts against the programme you champion.
Last stated 14 Mar 2014 · 13 years ago
Holds Chris Blattman
Similar wording
Give where there is strong evidence that donations do a lot of good, rather than where weak evidence suggests they might do far more.
Last stated 18 Aug 2011 · 15 years ago
Holds Holden Karnofsky
Similar wording
A therapy is only shown to be more effective if it is compared against another treatment intended to help, not against a control nobody expected to work.
Last stated 11 Sept 2024 · 2 years ago
Holds Scott D. Miller
Similar wording
Large replication projects answer the wrong question, because most individual studies do not matter either way.
Last stated 11 Apr 2023 · 4 years ago
Holds Adam Mastroianni
Similar wording
There is no correct heuristic for science, so what you need is many independent research programmes each running its own bias.
Last stated 30 Jun 2026 · 4 months ago
Holds Grant Sanderson
Similar wording
The case for giving poor people cash is not that it is a cure, but that it is less bad than most of what aid already does.
Last stated 27 Jun 2013 · 13 years ago
Holds Chris Blattman
Same subject: metascience
“Trust science” is a confused instruction: what deserves trust is the process, not any particular thing it has concluded so far.
Last stated 16 Aug 2023 · 3 years ago
Holds Jason Crawford
Same subject: metascience
A hotter field with more teams racing on the same question produces less reliable findings, not more.
Last stated 30 Aug 2005 · 21 years ago
Holds John Ioannidis
Same subject: metascience
A hyped effect shrinking to a small but real one as the studies improve is a sign that a field is working, not failing.
Last stated 11 Oct 2022 · 4 years ago
Holds Stuart Ritchie
Same subject: peer review
Economics journals have made large datasets and heavy statistics the price of making any causal claim at all, which has squeezed qualitative economic history out of the field.
Last stated 13 Oct 2025 · a year ago
Holds Anton Howes
Same subject: peer review
Fraudulent papers pass peer review routinely, which is direct evidence that peer review does not do the job it is supposed to do.
Last stated 13 Dec 2022 · 4 years ago
Holds Adam Mastroianni
Same subject: peer review
History has a reproducibility problem worse than science’s replication crisis, because hardly anyone ever goes back to the sources to check what a historian claimed they say.
Last stated 29 Aug 2023 · 3 years ago
Holds Anton Howes
Same subject: TypeScript
The most-cited study showing that language design affects software quality rests on misclassified repositories.
Last stated 7 Nov 2014 · 12 years ago
Holds Dan Luu
Same subject: TypeScript
A programming language functions as a lens that shapes how a problem is perceived when solving it.
Last stated 9 Apr 2019 · 8 years ago
Holds Thorsten Ball
Same subject: TypeScript
A programming language is a ten-year play: version one has issues, version two fixes them, version three is finally good — and only then does adoption start.
Last stated 13 May 2026 · 5 months ago
Holds Anders Hejlsberg