What Nathan Lambert thinks about cybersecurity

@nathan-lambert · 55 positions · On ppll ↗

Machine-learning researcher on open language models; writes the Interconnects newsletter and the RLHF Book, after leading post-training at Ai2.

Nathan Lambert did not write this page.

We collected these quotes from things they published elsewhere, and every quote links to where it was said. They have no account here and have not endorsed this site. Quotes are word for word; the short line under each one is our own restatement, not their wording. Their own site. Is this you? Claim it or ask us to remove it. Or tell us what is wrong here.

Filter cybersecurity · Newest first

Topic

All 55cybersecurity 1LLMs 28open source 11AI alignment 6America 6China 5AGI 3Anthropic 3innovation 3

23 more topics

reinforcement learning 3AI and science 2infrastructure 2OpenAI 2recursive self-improvement 2scaling laws 2semiconductors 2AI agents 1AI and jobs 1AI writing 1censorship 1creativity 1education 1energy 1measuring intelligence 1motivation 1neural networks 1politics 1quantum mechanics 1Silicon Valley 1startups 1taste 1writing 1

Sort

NewestOldest

Only Nathan Lambert on cybersecurity. See everyone on cybersecurity

1 dated position, 2026, in their own words. Our reading of what Nathan Lambert has said — not written or endorsed by them.

1 position so far — this page is not yet offered to search engines.

1. 10 Sept 2026

   Our readingAI-caused catastrophic extinction risk is negligible, but disasters like critical-infrastructure cyberattacks and bio-risks from AI are real and worth debating.

   infrastructure

   Their wordsI put the probability of complete extinction as being so low it isn't worth discussing, but the probabilities of AI caused disasters - e.g. cyber attacks on critical infrastructure or bio-risks - as being worth debating.

   ↗One resignation turned the embers of AI fear into a wildfireinterconnects.ai 1st of 3 in this piece