What Nathan Lambert thinks about OpenAI
Machine-learning researcher on open language models; writes the Interconnects newsletter and the RLHF Book, after leading post-training at Ai2.
Nathan Lambert did not write this page.
We collected these quotes from things they published elsewhere, and every quote links to where it was said. They have no account here and have not endorsed this site. Quotes are word for word; the short line under each one is our own restatement, not their wording. Their own site. Is this you? Claim it or ask us to remove it. Or tell us what is wrong here.
Filter OpenAI · Newest first
23 more topics
Only Nathan Lambert on OpenAI. See everyone on OpenAI
2 dated positions, 2025 to 2026, in their own words. Our reading of what Nathan Lambert has said — not written or endorsed by them.
-
Their wordsIt is very, very likely that OpenAI and Anthropic have far better internal models than Z.ai and Moonshot AI.
↗GLM-5.3: How Chinese labs keep stride with the frontierinterconnects.ai 1st of 3 in this piece
- 18 months earlier
-
Their wordsI think that they're trying to shift the narrative. They're trying to protect themselves. We saw this years ago when ByteDance was actually banned from some OpenAI APIs for training on outputs. There's other AI startups that most people, if you're in the AI culture, were like they just told us they trained on OpenAI outputs and they never got banned.
↗DeepSeek, China, OpenAI, NVIDIA, xAI, TSMC, Stargate, and AI Megaclusters | Lex Fridman Podcast #459youtube.com 30th of 44 in this recording