What Austin Vernon thinks about aviation
Engineer and investor who writes quantitative posts about how physical industries actually work — chemical plants, geothermal drilling, shipyards, thermal storage and the economics of low-volume manufacturing — at austinvernon.site.
Austin Vernon did not write this page.
We collected these quotes from things they published elsewhere, and every quote links to where it was said. They have no account here and have not endorsed this site. Quotes are word for word; the short line under each one is our own restatement, not their wording. Their own site. Is this you? Claim it or ask us to remove it. Or tell us what is wrong here.
4 dated positions, 2021, in their own words. Our reading of what Austin Vernon has said — not written or endorsed by them.
-
by
Their wordsSurprisingly, fuel consumption per passenger mile would be lower in a Celera 500 than in a 737. The larger the fuselage, the harder it is to achieve the same drag reduction.
↗Air Travel Doesn't Have to be Terribleaustinvernon.site 1st of 3 in this piece
-
by
Our readingWhat air travellers actually value is door-to-door time, and public policy tends not to measure it.
Their wordsReduction in door-to-door travel time is king. Public policy may not keep this in mind.
↗Air Travel Doesn't Have to be Terribleaustinvernon.site 2nd of 3 in this piece
-
by
Our readingThe constraint on point-to-point air travel is runway and tarmac capacity, not room in the sky.
Their wordsThere is much more space in the air than on the airport tarmac. Our current hub and spoke system means some hub airports operate near runway capacity already.
↗Air Travel Doesn't Have to be Terribleaustinvernon.site 3rd of 3 in this piece
- 8 weeks earlier
-
Their wordsThe changes separated its management and board from the day-to-day processes at the heart of its business.
↗America's Aerospace Industry is Regeneratingaustinvernon.site