Tap a claim on the ring to put it at the centre.
← When a team sees what needs to happen but does not want to be the bad…
17 connected korrents · 15 moments on record from 31 Jan 2013 to 11 Sept 2026.
Everything filed under coding agents
coding agents
Everything filed under team size
team size
Everything filed under software quality
software quality
Everything filed under management
management
Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject
Read this korrent: When a team sees what needs to happen but does not want to be the bad guy, someone making the call saves enormous amounts of meetings and change management.
When a team sees what needs to happen but does not want to be the bad guy, someone making the call saves enormous amounts of meetings and change management.
Last stated 3 days ago
11 Sept 2026
TL
Tobias Lütke — holds since 2026-09-11 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A language does not need a benevolent dictator: if the responsible team does not sign off on a change, it does not happen. — tap to centre the map on it
A language does not need a benevolent dictator: if the responsible team does not sign off on a change, it does not happen.
Last stated 4 months ago
20 May 2026
AR
Alice Ryhl — holds since 2026-05-20 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Fixing an understaffed team by moving people off other teams does not work, because people are not fungible and the argument inevitably turns political. — tap to centre the map on it
Fixing an understaffed team by moving people off other teams does not work, because people are not fungible and the argument inevitably turns political.
Last stated 8 years ago
17 Jun 2018
WL
Will Larson — holds since 2018-06-17 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Teams that trade quality for speed well never describe it that way — they make an explicit, bounded, risk-based decision. — tap to centre the map on it
Teams that trade quality for speed well never describe it that way — they make an explicit, bounded, risk-based decision.
Last stated 6 months ago
22 Mar 2026
NF
Nicole Forsgren — holds since 2026-03-22 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A small team is not a compromise: it is the only size at which everyone is in the room for every decision, including the ones outside their discipline. — tap to centre the map on it
A small team is not a compromise: it is the only size at which everyone is in the room for every decision, including the ones outside their discipline.
Last stated 6 months ago
11 Mar 2026
JK
Jeff Kaplan — holds since 2026-03-11 — tap for who they are
Same subject: The right posture toward your own team is verify then trust, not trust but verify. — tap to centre the map on it
The right posture toward your own team is verify then trust, not trust but verify.
Last stated a month ago
2 Aug 2026
TV
Tom Verrilli — holds since 2026-08-02 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A team of jerks almost never becomes a great team, in sport or in business. — tap to centre the map on it
A team of jerks almost never becomes a great team, in sport or in business.
Last stated a year ago
16 Jul 2025
JD
Jamie Dimon — holds since 2025-07-16 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A team that agrees has not examined the problem hard enough; dissent is what makes a decision safe. — tap to centre the map on it
A team that agrees has not examined the problem hard enough; dissent is what makes a decision safe.
Last stated 14 years ago
31 Jan 2013
WH
Wayne Hale — holds since 2013-01-31 — tap for who they are
Same subject: People in industry routinely short-circuit their reasoning, adopting what they heard in a conference talk instead of thinking it through from first principles. — tap to centre the map on it
People in industry routinely short-circuit their reasoning, adopting what they heard in a conference talk instead of thinking it through from first principles.
Last stated 5 months ago
22 Apr 2026
MK
Martin Kleppmann — holds since 2026-04-22 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A language-agnostic conformance suite is the most powerful thing you can hand a coding agent, because the whole instruction becomes: write code until these tests pass. — tap to centre the map on it
A language-agnostic conformance suite is the most powerful thing you can hand a coding agent, because the whole instruction becomes: write code until these tests pass.
Last stated 6 months ago
19 Mar 2026
SW
Simon Willison — holds since 2026-03-19 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A passing test suite is not evidence that the software works, so an agent must also be made to start the thing and exercise it the way a person would. — tap to centre the map on it
A passing test suite is not evidence that the software works, so an agent must also be made to start the thing and exercise it the way a person would.
Last stated 6 months ago
19 Mar 2026
SW
Simon Willison — holds since 2026-03-19 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A team that slows down and reads every pull request and every line of code should expect only a 30 to 50 percent productivity lift from AI. — tap to centre the map on it
A team that slows down and reads every pull request and every line of code should expect only a 30 to 50 percent productivity lift from AI.
Last stated 2 months ago
15 Jul 2026
DH
Dex Horthy — holds since 2026-07-15 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A few senior individual contributors can be paid VP money and still cost less than the layered product org they replace. — tap to centre the map on it
A few senior individual contributors can be paid VP money and still cost less than the layered product org they replace.
Last stated a month ago
2 Aug 2026
TV
Tom Verrilli — holds since 2026-08-02 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A functionally organised engineering team seizes up at around a hundred people, because every feature then has to be negotiated against every other team's bandwidth. — tap to centre the map on it
A functionally organised engineering team seizes up at around a hundred people, because every feature then has to be negotiated against every other team's bandwidth.
Last stated 5 months ago
1 Apr 2026
TP
Thuan Pham — holds since 2026-04-01 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A group of fewer than four people is not a team: it behaves like a set of individuals, and a single departure knocks it back into maintenance. — tap to centre the map on it
A group of fewer than four people is not a team: it behaves like a set of individuals, and a single departure knocks it back into maintenance.
Last stated 8 years ago
14 Jul 2018
WL
Will Larson — holds since 2018-07-14 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A coding agent does not learn from its mistakes the way a person does -- it repeats the same error indefinitely unless a human notices and writes it down. — tap to centre the map on it
A coding agent does not learn from its mistakes the way a person does -- it repeats the same error indefinitely unless a human notices and writes it down.
Last stated 6 months ago
25 Mar 2026
MZ
Mario Zechner — holds since 2026-03-25 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A coding-agent company should not train its own model: it has to stay neutral ground for models to compete on. — tap to centre the map on it
A coding-agent company should not train its own model: it has to stay neutral ground for models to compete on.
Last stated 2 weeks ago
3 Sept 2026
DR
Dax Raad — holds since 2026-09-03 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A company on a monolith cannot use AI on it: no model in the next eighteen months will hold that codebase, so the monolith has to be broken up or rewritten. — tap to centre the map on it
A company on a monolith cannot use AI on it: no model in the next eighteen months will hold that codebase, so the monolith has to be broken up or rewritten.
Last stated 6 months ago
11 Mar 2026
SY
Steve Yegge — holds since 2026-03-11 — tap for who they are
same subject or similar wording a cloud: claims about one subject, named for it bar: when it was last stated, on a scale from 2013 to today (stretched back to the oldest claim here) — full is today a face: someone on record holding the claim — tap it for who they are
At the centre
When a team sees what needs to happen but does not want to be the bad guy, someone making the call saves enormous amounts of meetings and change management.
Last stated 11 Sept 2026 · 3 days ago
Holds Tobias Lütke
Read this korrent →
Similar wording
A language does not need a benevolent dictator: if the responsible team does not sign off on a change, it does not happen.
Last stated 20 May 2026 · 4 months ago
Holds AR Alice Ryhl
Similar wording
Fixing an understaffed team by moving people off other teams does not work, because people are not fungible and the argument inevitably turns political.
Last stated 17 Jun 2018 · 8 years ago
Holds WL Will Larson
Similar wording
Teams that trade quality for speed well never describe it that way — they make an explicit, bounded, risk-based decision.
Last stated 22 Mar 2026 · 6 months ago
Holds NF Nicole Forsgren
Similar wording
A small team is not a compromise: it is the only size at which everyone is in the room for every decision, including the ones outside their discipline.
Last stated 11 Mar 2026 · 6 months ago
Holds JK Jeff Kaplan
Similar wording
The right posture toward your own team is verify then trust, not trust but verify.
Last stated 2 Aug 2026 · a month ago
Holds TV Tom Verrilli
Similar wording
A team of jerks almost never becomes a great team, in sport or in business.
Last stated 16 Jul 2025 · a year ago
Holds JD Jamie Dimon
Similar wording
A team that agrees has not examined the problem hard enough; dissent is what makes a decision safe.
Last stated 31 Jan 2013 · 14 years ago
Holds WH Wayne Hale
Similar wording
People in industry routinely short-circuit their reasoning, adopting what they heard in a conference talk instead of thinking it through from first principles.
Last stated 22 Apr 2026 · 5 months ago
Holds MK Martin Kleppmann
Same subject: software quality
A language-agnostic conformance suite is the most powerful thing you can hand a coding agent, because the whole instruction becomes: write code until these tests pass.
Last stated 19 Mar 2026 · 6 months ago
Holds Simon Willison
Same subject: software quality
A passing test suite is not evidence that the software works, so an agent must also be made to start the thing and exercise it the way a person would.
Last stated 19 Mar 2026 · 6 months ago
Holds Simon Willison
Same subject: software quality
A team that slows down and reads every pull request and every line of code should expect only a 30 to 50 percent productivity lift from AI.
Last stated 15 Jul 2026 · 2 months ago
Holds DH Dex Horthy
Same subject: team size
A few senior individual contributors can be paid VP money and still cost less than the layered product org they replace.
Last stated 2 Aug 2026 · a month ago
Holds TV Tom Verrilli
Same subject: team size
A functionally organised engineering team seizes up at around a hundred people, because every feature then has to be negotiated against every other team's bandwidth.
Last stated 1 Apr 2026 · 5 months ago
Holds TP Thuan Pham
Same subject: team size
A group of fewer than four people is not a team: it behaves like a set of individuals, and a single departure knocks it back into maintenance.
Last stated 14 Jul 2018 · 8 years ago
Holds WL Will Larson
Same subject: coding agents
A coding agent does not learn from its mistakes the way a person does -- it repeats the same error indefinitely unless a human notices and writes it down.
Last stated 25 Mar 2026 · 6 months ago
Holds Mario Zechner
Same subject: coding agents
A coding-agent company should not train its own model: it has to stay neutral ground for models to compete on.
Last stated 3 Sept 2026 · 2 weeks ago
Holds Dax Raad
Same subject: coding agents
A company on a monolith cannot use AI on it: no model in the next eighteen months will hold that codebase, so the monolith has to be broken up or rewritten.
Last stated 11 Mar 2026 · 6 months ago
Holds SY Steve Yegge