korrents

On the map

Tap a claim on the ring to put it at the centre.

← Ranking charities by their estimated expected value alone removes any…

4 connected korrents · 4 moments on record from 18 Aug 2011 to 28 Nov 2023.

Same subjectSame subjectSame subjectSame subject Read this korrent: Ranking charities by their estimated expected value alone removes any reward for being transparent about how they actually work. Ranking charities by their estimatedexpected value alone removes any rewardfor being transparent about how theyactually work. Last stated 15 years ago 18 Aug 2011 HK Holden Karnofsky — holds since 2011-08-18 — tap for who they are Same subject: A giving approach that ranks options only by estimated expected value, with no preference for better-grounded estimates, is flawed. — tap to centre the map on it A giving approach that ranks optionsonly by estimated expected value,with no preference forbetter-grounded estimates, isflawed. Last stated 15 years ago 18 Aug 2011 HK Holden Karnofsky — holds since 2011-08-18 — tap for who they are Same subject: The deeper anyone digs into a charity's cost-effectiveness estimate, the more unwarranted optimism they find, so the right prior on giving is a sceptical one. — tap to centre the map on it The deeper anyone digs into acharity's cost-effectivenessestimate, the more unwarrantedoptimism they find, so the rightprior on giving is a sceptical one. Last stated 15 years ago 18 Aug 2011 HK Holden Karnofsky — holds since 2011-08-18 — tap for who they are Same subject: Effective altruism's scandals are minor next to its record, and its ratio of accomplishments to scandals is as good as that of any large institution. — tap to centre the map on it Effective altruism's scandals areminor next to its record, and itsratio of accomplishments to scandalsis as good as that of any largeinstitution. Last stated 3 years ago 28 Nov 2023 SA Scott Alexander — holds since 2023-11-28 — tap for who they are Same subject: Explicit cost-effectiveness models deserve less weight in a giving decision than the strength of the organisation carrying the work out. — tap to centre the map on it Explicit cost-effectiveness modelsdeserve less weight in a givingdecision than the strength of theorganisation carrying the work out. Last stated 11 years ago 9 Dec 2015 EH Elie Hassenfeld — holds since 2014-12-17 — tap for who they are EH Elie Hassenfeld — no longer holds since 2015-12-09 — tap for who they are
same subject or similar wordingbar: when it was last stated, on a scale from 2011 to today (stretched back to the oldest claim here) — full is todaya face: someone on record holding the claim — tap it for who they arefaded, dashed ring: they no longer hold it — they changed their mind

At the centre Ranking charities by their estimated expected value alone removes any reward for being transparent about how they actually work. Last stated 18 Aug 2011 · 15 years ago Holds Holden Karnofsky Read this korrent →