Tap a claim on the ring to put it at the centre.
← Competition between AI companies and countries is pushing accelerated…
17 connected korrents · 16 moments from 24 Feb 2018 to 23 Sept 2026.
Everything filed under AGI
AGI
Everything filed under America
America
Everything filed under AI agents
AI agents
Everything filed under AI alignment
AI alignment
Everything filed under LLMs
LLMs
Everything filed under China
China Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Read this korrent: Competition between AI companies and countries is pushing accelerated AI development without sufficient caution, risking loss of control. Competition between AI companies and countries is pushing accelerated AI development without sufficient caution, risking loss of control. Last stated a year ago
3 Jun 2025
YB
Yoshua Bengio — holds since 2025-06-03 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Competitive pressure among AI developers could cause loss of control even without anyone intending it — tap to centre the map on it Competitive pressure among AI developers could cause loss of control even without anyone intending it Last stated 3 months ago
16 Jul 2026
MB
Miles Brundage — holds since 2026-07-16 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Companies do not have sufficient incentives to mitigate the major risks of AI, and competition between them is driving corner-cutting. — tap to centre the map on it Companies do not have sufficient incentives to mitigate the major risks of AI, and competition between them is driving corner-cutting. Last stated 2 years ago
15 Feb 2025
MB
Miles Brundage — holds since 2025-02-15 — tap for who they are
Same subject: The United States cannot hold a monopoly on superhuman AI, so competing with China has to be paired with coexisting with it. — tap to centre the map on it The United States cannot hold a monopoly on superhuman AI, so competing with China has to be paired with coexisting with it. Last stated 2 years ago
2 Feb 2025
MB
Miles Brundage — holds since 2025-02-02 — tap for who they are
Same subject: The AI industry needs far more regulation and probably some sort of enforceable slowdown. — tap to centre the map on it The AI industry needs far more regulation and probably some sort of enforceable slowdown. Last stated 3 weeks ago
15 Sept 2026
NS
Nate Silver — holds since 2026-09-15 — tap for who they are
Same subject: In a race to beat China on AI, the winners would be the AIs rather than humans. — tap to centre the map on it In a race to beat China on AI, the winners would be the AIs rather than humans. Last stated 3 weeks ago
14 Sept 2026
ZM
Zvi Mowshowitz — holds since 2026-09-14 — tap for who they are
Same subject: In most technology-driven industries, capability advantages are held for longer and are harder to fast-follow than is the case with AI models. — tap to centre the map on it In most technology-driven industries, capability advantages are held for longer and are harder to fast-follow than is the case with AI models. Last stated 6 months ago
26 Mar 2026
SK
Sriram Krishnan — holds since 2026-03-26 — tap for who they are
Same subject: The race between AI companies to build ever more powerful systems is a choice they made, not an inevitable law of nature, and it is a race everyone loses. — tap to centre the map on it The race between AI companies to build ever more powerful systems is a choice they made, not an inevitable law of nature, and it is a race everyone loses. Last stated a week ago
23 Sept 2026
YB
Yoshua Bengio — holds since 2026-09-23 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Even with human-like learners, competition will split the AI market into specialised niches rather than hand it to one company. — tap to centre the map on it Even with human-like learners, competition will split the AI market into specialised niches rather than hand it to one company. Last stated 10 months ago
25 Nov 2025
IS
Ilya Sutskever — holds since 2025-11-25 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A century of fire suppression policy in the American West has dangerously overloaded forests with fuel and made megafires more likely. — tap to centre the map on it A century of fire suppression policy in the American West has dangerously overloaded forests with fuel and made megafires more likely. Last stated a month ago
22 Aug 2026
JP
Jennifer Pahlka — holds since 2026-08-22 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A city's first rail line comes in at a reasonable cost and every line after it does not, because the follow-up outgrows the in-house team that oversaw the pilot. — tap to centre the map on it A city's first rail line comes in at a reasonable cost and every line after it does not, because the follow-up outgrows the in-house team that oversaw the pilot. Last stated 2 years ago
7 Dec 2024
AL
Alon Levy — holds since 2024-12-07 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A conspiracy theory can be used as a pretext to dismantle government programs and target researchers and citizens. — tap to centre the map on it A conspiracy theory can be used as a pretext to dismantle government programs and target researchers and citizens. Last stated 4 weeks ago
4 Sept 2026
AA
Anne Applebaum — holds since 2026-09-04 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A country outside the AI supply chain should just buy the index — which works only in the world where AI ends up commoditised rather than concentrated. — tap to centre the map on it A country outside the AI supply chain should just buy the index — which works only in the world where AI ends up commoditised rather than concentrated. Last stated 4 months ago
4 Jun 2026
AI
Alex Imas — holds since 2026-06-04 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A poor country should prioritise owning a piece of AI over retraining its workers, but it should not bet everything on that. — tap to centre the map on it A poor country should prioritise owning a piece of AI over retraining its workers, but it should not bet everything on that. Last stated 4 months ago
4 Jun 2026
PT
Phil Trammell — holds since 2026-06-04 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A slow takeoff is significantly more likely than a fast one: AI that is nearly as powerful will have transformed the world before the incredibly powerful kind arrives. — tap to centre the map on it A slow takeoff is significantly more likely than a fast one: AI that is nearly as powerful will have transformed the world before the incredibly powerful kind arrives. Last stated 9 years ago
24 Feb 2018
PC
Paul Christiano — holds since 2018-02-24 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A collection of AI agents does not automatically form a functioning organization any more than a group of smart people does. — tap to centre the map on it A collection of AI agents does not automatically form a functioning organization any more than a group of smart people does. Last stated 4 months ago
21 May 2026
RK
Rohit Krishnan — holds since 2026-05-21 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A company cannot be led by machines, because nobody would have recourse against them. — tap to centre the map on it A company cannot be led by machines, because nobody would have recourse against them. Last stated 3 weeks ago
15 Sept 2026
TL
Tobias Lütke — holds since 2026-09-15 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A computer-using agent needs a machine of its own, or you will spend the day fighting it for the mouse cursor. — tap to centre the map on it A computer-using agent needs a machine of its own, or you will spend the day fighting it for the mouse cursor. Last stated 2 months ago
10 Aug 2026
PS
Peter Steinberger — holds since 2026-08-10 — tap for who they are
At the centre
Competition between AI companies and countries is pushing accelerated AI development without sufficient caution, risking loss of control.
Holds Read this korrent →
Competitive pressure among AI developers could cause loss of control even without anyone intending it
Holds
Companies do not have sufficient incentives to mitigate the major risks of AI, and competition between them is driving corner-cutting.
Holds
The United States cannot hold a monopoly on superhuman AI, so competing with China has to be paired with coexisting with it.
Holds
The AI industry needs far more regulation and probably some sort of enforceable slowdown.
Holds
In a race to beat China on AI, the winners would be the AIs rather than humans.
Holds
In most technology-driven industries, capability advantages are held for longer and are harder to fast-follow than is the case with AI models.
Holds
The race between AI companies to build ever more powerful systems is a choice they made, not an inevitable law of nature, and it is a race everyone loses.
Holds
Even with human-like learners, competition will split the AI market into specialised niches rather than hand it to one company.
Holds
A century of fire suppression policy in the American West has dangerously overloaded forests with fuel and made megafires more likely.
Holds
A city's first rail line comes in at a reasonable cost and every line after it does not, because the follow-up outgrows the in-house team that oversaw the pilot.
Holds
A conspiracy theory can be used as a pretext to dismantle government programs and target researchers and citizens.
Holds
A country outside the AI supply chain should just buy the index — which works only in the world where AI ends up commoditised rather than concentrated.
Holds
A poor country should prioritise owning a piece of AI over retraining its workers, but it should not bet everything on that.
Holds
A slow takeoff is significantly more likely than a fast one: AI that is nearly as powerful will have transformed the world before the incredibly powerful kind arrives.
Holds
A collection of AI agents does not automatically form a functioning organization any more than a group of smart people does.
Holds
A company cannot be led by machines, because nobody would have recourse against them.
Holds
A computer-using agent needs a machine of its own, or you will spend the day fighting it for the mouse cursor.
Holds