Tap a claim on the ring to put it at the centre.
← A writer should keep a public list of the things they got…
17 connected korrents · 15 moments from 21 Aug 2019 to 27 Sept 2026.
Everything filed under writing
writing
Everything filed under AI and human skill
AI and human skill
Everything filed under AI writing
AI writing
Everything filed under metascience
metascience
Everything filed under documentation
documentation
Everything filed under taste
taste
Everything filed under design
design
In tension — Scott Alexander said both Rests on Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject
Read this korrent: A writer should keep a public list of the things they got significantly wrong, so that readers can judge their credibility.
A writer should keep a public list of the things they got significantly wrong, so that readers can judge their credibility.
Last stated 7 years ago
21 Aug 2019
SA
Scott Alexander — holds since 2019-08-21 — tap for who they are
In tension: Giving something 60-40 odds and being wrong is not itself a mistake. — tap to centre the map on it
Giving something 60-40 odds and being wrong is not itself a mistake.
Last stated 4 years ago
1 Feb 2023
SA
Scott Alexander — holds since 2023-02-01 — tap for who they are
Rests on: A retraction can itself be wrong, and be worth retracting. — tap to centre the map on it
A retraction can itself be wrong, and be worth retracting.
Last stated 3 years ago
22 Jun 2023
SA
Scott Alexander — holds since 2023-06-22 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Publishing a standing list of your own mistakes, and correcting them, is part of doing science honestly. — tap to centre the map on it
Publishing a standing list of your own mistakes, and correcting them, is part of doing science honestly.
Last stated 5 years ago
11 May 2021
SG
Stephan Guyenet — holds since 2021-05-11 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Published evidence should not be accepted just because it is published, since things can be published even if they are not true. — tap to centre the map on it
Published evidence should not be accepted just because it is published, since things can be published even if they are not true.
Last stated 7 years ago
12 Oct 2019
DK
Daniel Kahneman — holds since 2019-10-12 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Going to read work you know is good when your own is going badly is legitimate recalibration, not theft. — tap to centre the map on it
Going to read work you know is good when your own is going badly is legitimate recalibration, not theft.
Last stated 3 months ago
6 Aug 2026
GS
George Saunders — holds since 2026-08-06 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A first draft should not be graded good or bad; it is only the material that taste then gets to act on. — tap to centre the map on it
A first draft should not be graded good or bad; it is only the material that taste then gets to act on.
Last stated 3 months ago
6 Aug 2026
GS
George Saunders — holds since 2026-08-06 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Scientists should give all the information others need to judge their work, not just what points one way — tap to centre the map on it
Scientists should give all the information others need to judge their work, not just what points one way
RF
Richard Feynman — holds since c. 1974 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Reviewers can tell the obviously good from the obviously bad, but there is a messy middle where they cannot tell at all. — tap to centre the map on it
Reviewers can tell the obviously good from the obviously bad, but there is a messy middle where they cannot tell at all.
Last stated 6 years ago
20 Jan 2021
JR
José Luis Ricón — holds since 2021-01-20 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Publishing industry claims to predict how trends will play out, but such predictions are unreliable. — tap to centre the map on it
Publishing industry claims to predict how trends will play out, but such predictions are unreliable.
Last stated a month ago
15 Sept 2026
LM
Lincoln Michel — holds since 2026-09-15 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Reading bad work is instructive as well as reassuring, so a maker should not read only the good stuff. — tap to centre the map on it
Reading bad work is instructive as well as reassuring, so a maker should not read only the good stuff.
Last stated 3 years ago
7 Sept 2023
AK
Austin Kleon — holds since 2023-09-07 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A CEO who sends out an AI-written strategy memo is modelling that it is fine to outsource thinking and strategy. — tap to centre the map on it
A CEO who sends out an AI-written strategy memo is modelling that it is fine to outsource thinking and strategy.
Last stated 4 weeks ago
27 Sept 2026
MG
Molly Graham — holds since 2026-09-27 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A stream of AI-written papers with any error rate at all becomes insufferable, because finding the error costs more than the paper is worth even at ninety-nine percent. — tap to centre the map on it
A stream of AI-written papers with any error rate at all becomes insufferable, because finding the error costs more than the paper is worth even at ninety-nine percent.
Last stated 4 months ago
30 Jun 2026
GS
Grant Sanderson — holds since 2026-06-30 — tap for who they are
Same subject: AI can now produce in minutes work that used to take weeks to build. — tap to centre the map on it
AI can now produce in minutes work that used to take weeks to build.
Last stated 5 months ago
26 May 2026
CB
Carlos Alexandro Becker — holds since 2026-05-26 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A machine doing your work better than you is no reason to stop doing it, because the point of the work was never that only you could do it. — tap to centre the map on it
A machine doing your work better than you is no reason to stop doing it, because the point of the work was never that only you could do it.
Last stated 5 months ago
2 Jun 2026
LS
L. M. Sacasas — holds since 2026-06-02 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A skill being automated is not a reason to stop learning it: practising what machines already do is often the stepping stone to what only people can do. — tap to centre the map on it
A skill being automated is not a reason to stop learning it: practising what machines already do is often the stepping stone to what only people can do.
Last stated 11 months ago
18 Nov 2025
SY
Scott H. Young — holds since 2025-11-18 — tap for who they are
Same subject: AI agents are now capable enough that they should be trusted to improve the skills and systems that guide them. — tap to centre the map on it
AI agents are now capable enough that they should be trusted to improve the skills and systems that guide them.
Last stated a month ago
11 Sept 2026
FA
Fatih Arslan — holds since 2026-09-11 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A browser works better as a single window than as multiple separate windows. — tap to centre the map on it
A browser works better as a single window than as multiple separate windows.
Last stated a month ago
15 Sept 2026
CC
Chris Coyier — holds since 2026-09-15 — tap for who they are
SA
A view that moved — Scott Alexander: the centre claim 21 Aug 2019, then this one 1 Feb 2023
in tension rests on same subject or similar wording a cloud: claims about one subject, named for it bar: when it was last stated, on a scale from 2015 to today — full is today a face: someone who holds the claim — tap it for who they are a face on an edge: the same person said both claims — the arrow runs from the earlier to the later, a view that moved
At the centre
A writer should keep a public list of the things they got significantly wrong, so that readers can judge their credibility.
Last stated 21 Aug 2019 · 7 years ago
Holds Scott Alexander
Read this korrent →
In tension with
Giving something 60-40 odds and being wrong is not itself a mistake.
A view that moved. Scott Alexander said both: the centre claim 21 Aug 2019, then this one 1 Feb 2023.
Last stated 1 Feb 2023 · 4 years ago
Holds Scott Alexander
Supports
A retraction can itself be wrong, and be worth retracting.
Last stated 22 Jun 2023 · 3 years ago
Holds Scott Alexander
Similar wording
Publishing a standing list of your own mistakes, and correcting them, is part of doing science honestly.
Last stated 11 May 2021 · 5 years ago
Holds Stephan Guyenet
Similar wording
Published evidence should not be accepted just because it is published, since things can be published even if they are not true.
Last stated 12 Oct 2019 · 7 years ago
Holds Daniel Kahneman
Similar wording
Going to read work you know is good when your own is going badly is legitimate recalibration, not theft.
Last stated 6 Aug 2026 · 3 months ago
Holds George Saunders
Similar wording
A first draft should not be graded good or bad; it is only the material that taste then gets to act on.
Last stated 6 Aug 2026 · 3 months ago
Holds George Saunders
Similar wording
Scientists should give all the information others need to judge their work, not just what points one way
Last stated c. 1974
Holds Richard Feynman
Similar wording
Reviewers can tell the obviously good from the obviously bad, but there is a messy middle where they cannot tell at all.
Last stated 20 Jan 2021 · 6 years ago
Holds José Luis Ricón
Similar wording
Publishing industry claims to predict how trends will play out, but such predictions are unreliable.
Last stated 15 Sept 2026 · a month ago
Holds Lincoln Michel
Similar wording
Reading bad work is instructive as well as reassuring, so a maker should not read only the good stuff.
Last stated 7 Sept 2023 · 3 years ago
Holds Austin Kleon
Same subject: AI writing
A CEO who sends out an AI-written strategy memo is modelling that it is fine to outsource thinking and strategy.
Last stated 27 Sept 2026 · 4 weeks ago
Holds Molly Graham
Same subject: AI writing
A stream of AI-written papers with any error rate at all becomes insufferable, because finding the error costs more than the paper is worth even at ninety-nine percent.
Last stated 30 Jun 2026 · 4 months ago
Holds Grant Sanderson
Same subject: AI writing
AI can now produce in minutes work that used to take weeks to build.
Last stated 26 May 2026 · 5 months ago
Holds Carlos Alexandro Becker
Same subject: AI and human skill
A machine doing your work better than you is no reason to stop doing it, because the point of the work was never that only you could do it.
Last stated 2 Jun 2026 · 5 months ago
Holds L. M. Sacasas
Same subject: AI and human skill
A skill being automated is not a reason to stop learning it: practising what machines already do is often the stepping stone to what only people can do.
Last stated 18 Nov 2025 · 11 months ago
Holds Scott H. Young
Same subject: AI and human skill
AI agents are now capable enough that they should be trusted to improve the skills and systems that guide them.
Last stated 11 Sept 2026 · a month ago
Holds Fatih Arslan
Same subject: simplicity
A browser works better as a single window than as multiple separate windows.
Last stated 15 Sept 2026 · a month ago
Holds Chris Coyier