17 connected korrents · 18 moments from 22 Aug 2018 to 25 Sept 2026.
At the centre
A contribution is a cost to the maintainer, not a gift: it is taking part, not merely using the code, that consumes a project’s scarcest resource.
Last stated 17 Mar 2022 · 5 years ago
Holds
Filippo Valsorda
Nadia Asparouhova
Read this korrent →
-
Similar wording
Most of the code the world runs on is maintained by hobbyists with an hour or two a month, so any proposal that needs more than that will simply be ignored.
Last stated 1 Apr 2024 · 3 years ago
Holds
Thomas Depierre
-
Similar wording
A few hundred dollars a month is nothing to a company and transformative to a project, so engineers should be the ones asking their employers to pay it.
Last stated 22 Aug 2018 · 8 years ago
Holds
Drew DeVault
-
Similar wording
An open source maintainer is not a supplier: there is no relationship with the companies using the code, so they cannot impose requirements on the person who wrote it.
Last stated 31 Dec 2022 · 4 years ago
Holds
Thomas Depierre
-
Similar wording
Refactors are cheap now, so he just does them, even when they break other people's open pull requests.
Last stated 12 Feb 2026 · 8 months ago
Holds
Peter Steinberger
-
Similar wording
A contributor licence agreement exists so the company can relicense volunteers’ work, and should neither be signed nor asked for.
Last stated 22 Aug 2018 · 8 years ago
Holds
Drew DeVault
-
Similar wording
Open source is a gift: users are not entitled to make demands without putting any energy in themselves.
Last stated by 11 Aug 2025 · a year ago
Holds
Lee Robinson
-
Similar wording
The case for sweating every line of code was premised on humans doing the modifications, and it now survives only because tokens are scarce.
Last stated 26 Aug 2026 · 2 months ago
Holds
David Heinemeier Hansson
-
Similar wording
Low-quality AI-generated code contributions betray the care that goes into writing and maintaining software for others.
Last stated 25 Sept 2026 · 4 weeks ago
Holds
Cory Doctorow
-
Same subject: LLMs
A badly written AI outbound email is evidence of a bad vendor, not of a limit of AI.
Last stated 1 Jan 2026 · 10 months ago
Holds
Jason Lemkin
-
Same subject: LLMs
A bigger context window does not give you a smarter model; the intelligence of the model is what decides how much of that window it can actually attend to.
Last stated 15 Jul 2026 · 3 months ago
Holds
Dex Horthy
-
Same subject: LLMs
A body of publications is easy for AI models to consume via pretraining corpora but cumbersome for most humans due to CAPTCHAs, accounts, and paywalls.
Last stated 17 Sept 2026 · a month ago
Holds
Patrick Collison
-
Same subject: Linux
A big switch to desktop Linux is coming, at least among developers, because there is enough dissatisfaction with both Apple and Microsoft.
Last stated 26 Jun 2025 · a year ago
Holds
David Heinemeier Hansson
-
Same subject: Linux
Coding agents make doing things on Linux far more approachable.
Last stated 8 Jun 2026 · 4 months ago
Holds
Ben Vinegar
-
Same subject: Linux
Desktop Linux improved dramatically while Apple's users were not watching, and is now far more polished and capable than its reputation.
Last stated 26 Aug 2025 · a year ago
Holds
David Heinemeier Hansson
-
Same subject: cybersecurity
A breached organisation owes its customers a fast and transparent disclosure, and that obligation applies to the person saying it too.
Last stated 25 Mar 2025 · 2 years ago
Holds
Troy Hunt
-
Same subject: cybersecurity
A correctly configured TLS server should send its intermediate certificates, not just its own certificate, to let clients chain back to a trusted root.
Last stated 16 Feb 2026 · 8 months ago
Holds
Jon Seager
-
Same subject: cybersecurity
A library that skips certificate verification by default is unsafe and should not be trusted.
Last stated 8 Apr 2025 · 2 years ago
Holds
Phil Hagelberg