korrents

code generation

Machines emitting code and files, and whether the volume they produce is a cost somebody eventually pays.

What people on korrents have said about code generation, newest first — 6 positions from 3 people.

FilterEveryone, all time
  1. DH

    David Heinemeier Hansson quoted

    The case for sweating every line of code was premised on humans doing the modifications, and it now survives only because tokens are scarce.

    That was premised on humans doing the modifications. I think it is an open question to which degree this still matters. Now, it does matter, and the reason I say that, at least for the moment, is that tokens are still scarce. At this moment in time, we are all token limited.

    DHH: Future of Programming, AI, Agentic Engineering, Vibe Coding & Linux | Lex Fridman Podcast #501youtube.com 16th of 41 in this recording

  2. 4 weeks earlier
  3. DH

    David Heinemeier Hansson quoted

    AI acceleration threatens 'less software': without the constraint of scarce hours, even 37signals will likely build too much.

    So, this is why I'm quite skeptical about all this new AI acceleration we're having is even us, I think it's quite likely that we could use it wrong to build too much software, to get too far away from less software, learnable software. It still has to fit in the mind of a human.

    DHH: How to Build a Profitable Company Without Losing Controlyoutube.com 2nd of 15 in this recording

  4. 5 months earlier
  5. PS

    Peter Steinberger quoted

    He does not read the boring parts of generated code, the data-shuffling and button alignment; what touches the database he reads and reviews.

    I know I have one blog post where I say, "I don't read the code." But if you read it more closely, I mean, I don't read the boring parts of code.

    OpenClaw: The Viral AI Agent that Broke the Internet - Peter Steinberger | Lex Fridman Podcast #491youtube.com 8th of 30 in this recording

    AI alignment

  6. 7 months earlier
  7. DH

    David Heinemeier Hansson quoted

    The prediction that 90% of code will be AI-written by the end of 2025 deserves skepticism, though manual programming may yet become a horse: ridden for love, not transport.

    The Anthropic CEO seems to think that 90% of all code by the end of the year is gonna be written by AI. I am more than a little bit skeptical about that, but I'm open-minded about the prospect that programming potentially will turn into a horse when done manually.

    DHH: Future of Programming, AI, Ruby on Rails, Productivity & Parenting | Lex Fridman Podcast #474youtube.com 11th of 36 in this recording

    Anthropic

  8. 6 years earlier
  9. DS

    Derek Sivers quoted

    Code and files generated by tools are pollution: hand-writing them is worth the effort because the bloat slows everything down for everyone.

    I prefer coding everything by hand, because I don't like the huge piles of garbage that the automated generators create.

    Digital pollutionsive.rs 1st of 2 in this piece

  10. DS

    Derek Sivers quoted

    Generators emit thousands of lines where ten would do, and that waste is why people think their phone is slow.

    These programs that generate a website, app, or file for you spit out thousands of lines of unnecessary junk when really only 10 lines are needed.

    Digital pollutionsive.rs 2nd of 2 in this piece