Tap a claim on the ring to put it at the centre.
← A contributor licence agreement exists so the company can relicense…
17 connected korrents · 18 moments from 17 Dec 2014 to 17 Sept 2026. Nearly all of them are about open source .
Everything filed under coding agents
coding agents
Everything filed under LLMs
LLMs
Everything filed under developer tools
developer tools
Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject
Read this korrent: A contributor licence agreement exists so the company can relicense volunteers’ work, and should neither be signed nor asked for.
A contributor licence agreement exists so the company can relicense volunteers’ work, and should neither be signed nor asked for.
Last stated 8 years ago
22 Aug 2018
DD
Drew DeVault — holds since 2018-08-22 — tap for who they are
Same subject: New licences are the wrong lever for paying maintainers: copyleft’s history shows terms companies ignore, and relicensing attempts get beaten back by their own communities. — tap to centre the map on it
New licences are the wrong lever for paying maintainers: copyleft’s history shows terms companies ignore, and relicensing attempts get beaten back by their own communities.
Last stated 8 years ago
14 Mar 2019
NA
Nadia Asparouhova — holds since 2019-03-14 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A contribution is a cost to the maintainer, not a gift: it is taking part, not merely using the code, that consumes a project’s scarcest resource. — tap to centre the map on it
A contribution is a cost to the maintainer, not a gift: it is taking part, not merely using the code, that consumes a project’s scarcest resource.
Last stated 5 years ago
17 Mar 2022
FV
Filippo Valsorda — holds since 2022-03-17 — tap for who they are
NA
Nadia Asparouhova — holds since 2019-03-14 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Companies are willing to pay for their critical open source dependencies; what is missing is a legible way for projects to sell it to them. — tap to centre the map on it
Companies are willing to pay for their critical open source dependencies; what is missing is a legible way for projects to sell it to them.
Last stated 2 years ago
8 Jul 2024
FV
Filippo Valsorda — holds since 2024-07-08 — tap for who they are
Same subject: If a company wants a maintainer to work to its standards, it has to start paying them under a different licence first. — tap to centre the map on it
If a company wants a maintainer to work to its standards, it has to start paying them under a different licence first.
Last stated 4 years ago
31 Dec 2022
TD
Thomas Depierre — holds since 2022-12-31 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Company sponsorships, not individual ones, are where open source funding has to come from. — tap to centre the map on it
Company sponsorships, not individual ones, are where open source funding has to come from.
Last stated 7 years ago
24 May 2019
NA
Nadia Asparouhova — no longer holds since 2019-05-24 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Matt Mullenweg's demands on WP Engine violate the letter and spirit of open source licences: you do not get to take a gift back. — tap to centre the map on it
Matt Mullenweg's demands on WP Engine violate the letter and spirit of open source licences: you do not get to take a gift back.
Last stated a year ago
12 Jul 2025
DH
David Heinemeier Hansson — holds since 2025-07-12 — tap for who they are
Same subject: It is not appropriate to donate to your own employer, however good a giving opportunity it would otherwise be. — tap to centre the map on it
It is not appropriate to donate to your own employer, however good a giving opportunity it would otherwise be.
Last stated 12 years ago
17 Dec 2014
EH
Elie Hassenfeld — holds since 2014-12-17 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Agent-written pull requests already outclass those of the median human contributor to an open source project. — tap to centre the map on it
Agent-written pull requests already outclass those of the median human contributor to an open source project.
Last stated 2 months ago
26 Aug 2026
DH
David Heinemeier Hansson — holds since 2026-08-26 — tap for who they are
Same subject: "I don't know" becomes a kind of superpower when you can work with Claude Code to figure things out. — tap to centre the map on it
"I don't know" becomes a kind of superpower when you can work with Claude Code to figure things out.
Last stated 7 months ago
19 Mar 2026
KP
Kris Puckett — holds since 2026-03-19 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A coding agent does not learn from its mistakes the way a person does -- it repeats the same error indefinitely unless a human notices and writes it down. — tap to centre the map on it
A coding agent does not learn from its mistakes the way a person does -- it repeats the same error indefinitely unless a human notices and writes it down.
Last stated 7 months ago
25 Mar 2026
MZ
Mario Zechner — holds since 2026-03-25 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A coding agent left to run over a weekend returns work that is half good, a quarter garbage and a quarter in need of repair. — tap to centre the map on it
A coding agent left to run over a weekend returns work that is half good, a quarter garbage and a quarter in need of repair.
Last stated a year ago
18 Aug 2025
CB
Clay Bavor — holds since 2025-08-18 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A badly written AI outbound email is evidence of a bad vendor, not of a limit of AI. — tap to centre the map on it
A badly written AI outbound email is evidence of a bad vendor, not of a limit of AI.
Last stated 10 months ago
1 Jan 2026
JL
Jason Lemkin — holds since 2026-01-01 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A bigger context window does not give you a smarter model; the intelligence of the model is what decides how much of that window it can actually attend to. — tap to centre the map on it
A bigger context window does not give you a smarter model; the intelligence of the model is what decides how much of that window it can actually attend to.
Last stated 3 months ago
15 Jul 2026
DH
Dex Horthy — holds since 2026-07-15 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A body of publications is easy for AI models to consume via pretraining corpora but cumbersome for most humans due to CAPTCHAs, accounts, and paywalls. — tap to centre the map on it
A body of publications is easy for AI models to consume via pretraining corpora but cumbersome for most humans due to CAPTCHAs, accounts, and paywalls.
Last stated a month ago
17 Sept 2026
PC
Patrick Collison — holds since 2026-09-17 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A compiler that also serves an IDE has to be lazy and deferred throughout — a different way of building compilers from the one the textbooks teach. — tap to centre the map on it
A compiler that also serves an IDE has to be lazy and deferred throughout — a different way of building compilers from the one the textbooks teach.
Last stated 5 months ago
13 May 2026
AH
Anders Hejlsberg — holds since 2026-05-13 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A developer using AI coding tools remains responsible for reviewing the code they ship. — tap to centre the map on it
A developer using AI coding tools remains responsible for reviewing the code they ship.
Last stated 7 months ago
10 Mar 2026
JS
Jon Seager — holds since 2026-03-10 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A good tool raises the floor of what people can build without lowering the ceiling, and almost every tool quietly lowers the ceiling. — tap to centre the map on it
A good tool raises the floor of what people can build without lowering the ceiling, and almost every tool quietly lowers the ceiling.
Last stated a year ago
18 Sept 2025
TL
Tobias Lütke — holds since 2025-09-18 — tap for who they are
same subject or similar wording a cloud: claims about one subject, named for it bar: when it was last stated, on a scale from 2014 to today (stretched back to the oldest claim here) — full is today a face: someone who holds the claim — tap it for who they are faded, dashed ring: they no longer hold it — they changed their mind
At the centre
A contributor licence agreement exists so the company can relicense volunteers’ work, and should neither be signed nor asked for.
Last stated 22 Aug 2018 · 8 years ago
Holds Drew DeVault
Read this korrent →
Similar wording
New licences are the wrong lever for paying maintainers: copyleft’s history shows terms companies ignore, and relicensing attempts get beaten back by their own communities.
Last stated 14 Mar 2019 · 8 years ago
Holds Nadia Asparouhova
Similar wording
A contribution is a cost to the maintainer, not a gift: it is taking part, not merely using the code, that consumes a project’s scarcest resource.
Last stated 17 Mar 2022 · 5 years ago
Holds Filippo Valsorda Nadia Asparouhova
Similar wording
Companies are willing to pay for their critical open source dependencies; what is missing is a legible way for projects to sell it to them.
Last stated 8 Jul 2024 · 2 years ago
Holds Filippo Valsorda
Similar wording
If a company wants a maintainer to work to its standards, it has to start paying them under a different licence first.
Last stated 31 Dec 2022 · 4 years ago
Holds Thomas Depierre
Similar wording
Company sponsorships, not individual ones, are where open source funding has to come from.
Last stated 24 May 2019 · 7 years ago
No longer holds Nadia Asparouhova
Similar wording
Matt Mullenweg's demands on WP Engine violate the letter and spirit of open source licences: you do not get to take a gift back.
Last stated 12 Jul 2025 · a year ago
Holds David Heinemeier Hansson
Similar wording
It is not appropriate to donate to your own employer, however good a giving opportunity it would otherwise be.
Last stated 17 Dec 2014 · 12 years ago
Holds Elie Hassenfeld
Similar wording
Agent-written pull requests already outclass those of the median human contributor to an open source project.
Last stated 26 Aug 2026 · 2 months ago
Holds David Heinemeier Hansson
Same subject: coding agents
"I don't know" becomes a kind of superpower when you can work with Claude Code to figure things out.
Last stated 19 Mar 2026 · 7 months ago
Holds Kris Puckett
Same subject: coding agents
A coding agent does not learn from its mistakes the way a person does -- it repeats the same error indefinitely unless a human notices and writes it down.
Last stated 25 Mar 2026 · 7 months ago
Holds Mario Zechner
Same subject: coding agents
A coding agent left to run over a weekend returns work that is half good, a quarter garbage and a quarter in need of repair.
Last stated 18 Aug 2025 · a year ago
Holds Clay Bavor
Same subject: LLMs
A badly written AI outbound email is evidence of a bad vendor, not of a limit of AI.
Last stated 1 Jan 2026 · 10 months ago
Holds Jason Lemkin
Same subject: LLMs
A bigger context window does not give you a smarter model; the intelligence of the model is what decides how much of that window it can actually attend to.
Last stated 15 Jul 2026 · 3 months ago
Holds Dex Horthy
Same subject: LLMs
A body of publications is easy for AI models to consume via pretraining corpora but cumbersome for most humans due to CAPTCHAs, accounts, and paywalls.
Last stated 17 Sept 2026 · a month ago
Holds Patrick Collison
Same subject: developer tools
A compiler that also serves an IDE has to be lazy and deferred throughout — a different way of building compilers from the one the textbooks teach.
Last stated 13 May 2026 · 5 months ago
Holds Anders Hejlsberg
Same subject: developer tools
A developer using AI coding tools remains responsible for reviewing the code they ship.
Last stated 10 Mar 2026 · 7 months ago
Holds Jon Seager
Same subject: developer tools
A good tool raises the floor of what people can build without lowering the ceiling, and almost every tool quietly lowers the ceiling.
Last stated 18 Sept 2025 · a year ago
Holds Tobias Lütke