Tap a claim on the ring to put it at the centre.
← If a company wants a maintainer to work to its standards, it has to…
16 connected korrents · 11 moments on record from 22 Aug 2018 to 16 Nov 2025.
Everything filed under Hyprland
Hyprland
Everything filed under open source
open source
Everything filed under Linux
Linux
Everything filed under Arch Linux
Arch Linux
Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject
Read this korrent: If a company wants a maintainer to work to its standards, it has to start paying them under a different licence first.
If a company wants a maintainer to work to its standards, it has to start paying them under a different licence first.
Last stated 4 years ago
31 Dec 2022
TD
Thomas Depierre — holds since 2022-12-31 — tap for who they are
Same subject: New licences are the wrong lever for paying maintainers: copyleft’s history shows terms companies ignore, and relicensing attempts get beaten back by their own communities. — tap to centre the map on it
New licences are the wrong lever for paying maintainers: copyleft’s history shows terms companies ignore, and relicensing attempts get beaten back by their own communities.
Last stated 7 years ago
14 Mar 2019
NA
Nadia Asparouhova — holds since 2019-03-14 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Paying a maintainer must not buy a say in the project’s direction; funding and governance have to be kept as separate as possible. — tap to centre the map on it
Paying a maintainer must not buy a say in the project’s direction; funding and governance have to be kept as separate as possible.
Last stated 4 years ago
17 Mar 2022
FV
Filippo Valsorda — holds since 2022-03-17 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Charging large companies for a licence sends them back through procurement, so they drift to a worse free alternative rather than pay. — tap to centre the map on it
Charging large companies for a licence sends them back through procurement, so they drift to a worse free alternative rather than pay.
Last stated 10 months ago
16 Nov 2025
TD
Thomas Depierre — holds since 2025-11-16 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Companies are willing to pay for their critical open source dependencies; what is missing is a legible way for projects to sell it to them. — tap to centre the map on it
Companies are willing to pay for their critical open source dependencies; what is missing is a legible way for projects to sell it to them.
Last stated 2 years ago
8 Jul 2024
FV
Filippo Valsorda — holds since 2024-07-08 — tap for who they are
Same subject: An open source maintainer is not a supplier: there is no relationship with the companies using the code, so they cannot impose requirements on the person who wrote it. — tap to centre the map on it
An open source maintainer is not a supplier: there is no relationship with the companies using the code, so they cannot impose requirements on the person who wrote it.
Last stated 4 years ago
31 Dec 2022
TD
Thomas Depierre — holds since 2022-12-31 — tap for who they are
Same subject: The thing open source can actually sell is not the code but access to its maintainers’ attention and expertise. — tap to centre the map on it
The thing open source can actually sell is not the code but access to its maintainers’ attention and expertise.
Last stated 2 years ago
8 Jul 2024
FV
Filippo Valsorda — holds since 2024-07-08 — tap for who they are
NA
Nadia Asparouhova — holds since 2019-03-14 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A contributor licence agreement exists so the company can relicense volunteers’ work, and should neither be signed nor asked for. — tap to centre the map on it
A contributor licence agreement exists so the company can relicense volunteers’ work, and should neither be signed nor asked for.
Last stated 8 years ago
22 Aug 2018
DD
Drew DeVault — holds since 2018-08-22 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Nobody should be paid on a particular deal, because a person paid on a particular thing will do the wrong thing. — tap to centre the map on it
Nobody should be paid on a particular deal, because a person paid on a particular thing will do the wrong thing.
Last stated a year ago
16 Jul 2025
JD
Jamie Dimon — holds since 2025-07-16 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Arch's community package repository removes the manual scripting that a developer's setup still needs on Ubuntu. — tap to centre the map on it
Arch's community package repository removes the manual scripting that a developer's setup still needs on Ubuntu.
Last stated a year ago
2 Jun 2025
DH
David Heinemeier Hansson — holds since 2025-06-02 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Needing a choice and a config file for every last detail is both the cost of Arch with Hyprland and the reason it can be made entirely your own. — tap to centre the map on it
Needing a choice and a config file for every last detail is both the cost of Arch with Hyprland and the reason it can be made entirely your own.
Last stated a year ago
2 Jun 2025
DH
David Heinemeier Hansson — holds since 2025-06-02 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Hyprland put a twenty-year-old distribution in front of people who never believed open source could deliver a desktop worth leaving Windows or macOS for. — tap to centre the map on it
Hyprland put a twenty-year-old distribution in front of people who never believed open source could deliver a desktop worth leaving Windows or macOS for.
Last stated a year ago
5 Aug 2025
DH
David Heinemeier Hansson — holds since 2025-08-05 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A big switch to desktop Linux is coming, at least among developers, because there is enough dissatisfaction with both Apple and Microsoft. — tap to centre the map on it
A big switch to desktop Linux is coming, at least among developers, because there is enough dissatisfaction with both Apple and Microsoft.
Last stated a year ago
26 Jun 2025
DH
David Heinemeier Hansson — holds since 2025-06-26 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Desktop Linux improved dramatically while Apple's users were not watching, and is now far more polished and capable than its reputation. — tap to centre the map on it
Desktop Linux improved dramatically while Apple's users were not watching, and is now far more polished and capable than its reputation.
Last stated a year ago
26 Aug 2025
DH
David Heinemeier Hansson — holds since 2025-08-26 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Desktop Linux is not for everyone, because plenty of people want a computer appliance they never have to look under the hood of. — tap to centre the map on it
Desktop Linux is not for everyone, because plenty of people want a computer appliance they never have to look under the hood of.
Last stated a year ago
5 Aug 2025
DH
David Heinemeier Hansson — holds since 2025-08-05 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Hyprland is hard because it ships with nothing, not because tiling window management is difficult. — tap to centre the map on it
Hyprland is hard because it ships with nothing, not because tiling window management is difficult.
Last stated a year ago
26 Jun 2025
DH
David Heinemeier Hansson — holds since 2025-06-26 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Setting up Hyprland from scratch costs at least ten hours of installing and configuring. — tap to centre the map on it
Setting up Hyprland from scratch costs at least ten hours of installing and configuring.
Last stated a year ago
2 Jun 2025
DH
David Heinemeier Hansson — holds since 2025-06-02 — tap for who they are
same subject or similar wording a cloud: claims about one subject, named for it bar: when it was last stated, on a scale from 2015 to today — full is today a face: someone on record holding the claim — tap it for who they are
At the centre
If a company wants a maintainer to work to its standards, it has to start paying them under a different licence first.
Last stated 31 Dec 2022 · 4 years ago
Holds TD Thomas Depierre
Read this korrent →
Similar wording
New licences are the wrong lever for paying maintainers: copyleft’s history shows terms companies ignore, and relicensing attempts get beaten back by their own communities.
Last stated 14 Mar 2019 · 7 years ago
Holds NA Nadia Asparouhova
Similar wording
Paying a maintainer must not buy a say in the project’s direction; funding and governance have to be kept as separate as possible.
Last stated 17 Mar 2022 · 4 years ago
Holds FV Filippo Valsorda
Similar wording
Charging large companies for a licence sends them back through procurement, so they drift to a worse free alternative rather than pay.
Last stated 16 Nov 2025 · 10 months ago
Holds TD Thomas Depierre
Similar wording
Companies are willing to pay for their critical open source dependencies; what is missing is a legible way for projects to sell it to them.
Last stated 8 Jul 2024 · 2 years ago
Holds FV Filippo Valsorda
Similar wording
An open source maintainer is not a supplier: there is no relationship with the companies using the code, so they cannot impose requirements on the person who wrote it.
Last stated 31 Dec 2022 · 4 years ago
Holds TD Thomas Depierre
Similar wording
The thing open source can actually sell is not the code but access to its maintainers’ attention and expertise.
Last stated 8 Jul 2024 · 2 years ago
Holds FV Filippo ValsordaNA Nadia Asparouhova
Similar wording
A contributor licence agreement exists so the company can relicense volunteers’ work, and should neither be signed nor asked for.
Last stated 22 Aug 2018 · 8 years ago
Holds DD Drew DeVault
Similar wording
Nobody should be paid on a particular deal, because a person paid on a particular thing will do the wrong thing.
Last stated 16 Jul 2025 · a year ago
Holds JD Jamie Dimon
Same subject: Arch Linux
Arch's community package repository removes the manual scripting that a developer's setup still needs on Ubuntu.
Last stated 2 Jun 2025 · a year ago
Holds David Heinemeier Hansson
Same subject: Arch Linux
Needing a choice and a config file for every last detail is both the cost of Arch with Hyprland and the reason it can be made entirely your own.
Last stated 2 Jun 2025 · a year ago
Holds David Heinemeier Hansson
Same subject: Arch Linux
Hyprland put a twenty-year-old distribution in front of people who never believed open source could deliver a desktop worth leaving Windows or macOS for.
Last stated 5 Aug 2025 · a year ago
Holds David Heinemeier Hansson
Same subject: Linux
A big switch to desktop Linux is coming, at least among developers, because there is enough dissatisfaction with both Apple and Microsoft.
Last stated 26 Jun 2025 · a year ago
Holds David Heinemeier Hansson
Same subject: Linux
Desktop Linux improved dramatically while Apple's users were not watching, and is now far more polished and capable than its reputation.
Last stated 26 Aug 2025 · a year ago
Holds David Heinemeier Hansson
Same subject: Linux
Desktop Linux is not for everyone, because plenty of people want a computer appliance they never have to look under the hood of.
Last stated 5 Aug 2025 · a year ago
Holds David Heinemeier Hansson
Same subject: Hyprland
Hyprland is hard because it ships with nothing, not because tiling window management is difficult.
Last stated 26 Jun 2025 · a year ago
Holds David Heinemeier Hansson
Same subject: Hyprland
Setting up Hyprland from scratch costs at least ten hours of installing and configuring.
Last stated 2 Jun 2025 · a year ago
Holds David Heinemeier Hansson