What Naval Ravikant thinks about AI alignment
Co-founder of AngelList. Writes and podcasts at nav.al in short, aphoristic pieces on startups, wealth and judgement rather than long essays.
Naval Ravikant did not write this page.
We collected these quotes from things they published elsewhere, and every quote links to where it was said. They have no account here and have not endorsed this site. Quotes are word for word; the short line under each one is our own restatement, not their wording. Their own site. Is this you? Claim it or ask us to remove it. Or tell us what is wrong here.
Filter AI alignment · Newest first
Only Naval Ravikant on AI alignment. See everyone on AI alignment
5 dated positions, 2026, in their own words. Our reading of what Naval Ravikant has said — not written or endorsed by them.
-
Their wordsIf AI is risky like fire is risky, then you want everyone to have it. If AI is risky like a nuclear weapon is risky, then you want no one to have it.
-
Their wordsThe future is more likely AIs fighting AIs (on behalf of humans) than AI fighting humanity.
-
Our readingThe best way to pace the AI frontier is to hold labs fully liable for their models' behavior.
Their wordsThe best way to pace the frontier is to hold the labs fully liable for the behavior of their models.
- 3 days earlier
-
Their wordsStrong liability enforcement could be helpful in the AI debate. If your agent swarm goes rogue, you’re liable. If your weakly protected model gets jailbroken, you’re liable. If you serve a weakly protected OSS model, you’re liable.
-
Their wordsOn the way to killing all of us, AI will likely kill some of us.