What Kelsey Piper thinks about Anthropic
Journalist writing on AI, effective altruism and global development; contributing writer at The Argument, previously a senior writer at Vox's Future Perfect.
Kelsey Piper did not write this page.
We collected these quotes from things they published elsewhere, and every quote links to where it was said. They have no account here and have not endorsed this site. Quotes are word for word; the short line under each one is our own restatement, not their wording. Their own site. Is this you? Claim it or ask us to remove it. Or tell us what is wrong here.
Filter Anthropic · Newest first
Only Kelsey Piper on Anthropic. See everyone on Anthropic
3 dated positions, 2026, in their own words. Our reading of what Kelsey Piper has said — not written or endorsed by them.
-
Their wordsif Anthropic is correct, if we now have AIs that are smart enough to considerably improve the process of training future AIs, and if things can be expected to speed up rather than slow down from here, then it seems very unlikely to me that this ends well.
↗The Opening Argumenttheargumentmag.com 2nd of 3 in this piece
- 8 months earlier
-
Our readingThe dispute between the DOD and Anthropic will likely be detrimental to national security concerns.
Their wordsThis escalated the contract dispute into a fiasco that, multiple experts in AI and public policy told me, will probably end up being quite bad for the very national security concerns that supposedly motivated it.
↗Anthropic is somehow both too dangerous to allow and essential to national securitytheargumentmag.com 1st of 3 in this piece
-
Their wordsYou couldn't use Claude to power a killer bot right now even if you wanted to; it would be a danger to our troops and fairly useless at our objectives.
↗Anthropic is somehow both too dangerous to allow and essential to national securitytheargumentmag.com 2nd of 3 in this piece