korrents

korrents · piece

Anthropic is somehow both too dangerous to allow and essential to national security

Kelsey Piper · 26 Feb 2026

Read the piece on theargumentmag.com ↗

3 korrents from this piece ↓

Kelsey Piper did not write this page.

Every claim below was made in this piece, quoted word for word and numbered in the order the piece makes them, so you can read it there rather than take our word for it. The sentence above each quote is our reading of the claim, not their wording. Each quote was checked against a stored copy of the page at build time; where the two differ, the quote is the fact.

  1. Our reading

    The dispute between the DOD and Anthropic will likely be detrimental to national security concerns.

    Their wordsThis escalated the contract dispute into a fiasco that, multiple experts in AI and public policy told me, will probably end up being quite bad for the very national security concerns that supposedly motivated it.

  2. Our reading

    Claude is currently unsuitable for powering autonomous weapons due to poor visuospatial capabilities.

    Their wordsYou couldn't use Claude to power a killer bot right now even if you wanted to; it would be a danger to our troops and fairly useless at our objectives.

  3. Our reading

    The government's actions may cause AI companies to be more reluctant to engage with the government and more inclined to work in secrecy.

    Their wordsBut I think a much likelier consequence of this behavior by the government is for AI labs to be much more reluctant to engage with the government, much less inclined to build partnerships, and much more inclined to work in secrecy.

Keep reading