korrents
Dario Amodei

What Dario Amodei thinks about LLMs

@dario-amodei · 43 positions · On ppll ↗

Co-founder and CEO of Anthropic; previously VP of research at OpenAI.

Dario Amodei did not write this page.

We collected these quotes from things they published elsewhere, and every quote links to where it was said. They have no account here and have not endorsed this site. Quotes are word for word; the short line under each one is our own restatement, not their wording. Their own site. Is this you? Claim it or ask us to remove it. Or tell us what is wrong here.

10 dated positions, 2020 to 2026, in their own words. Our reading of what Dario Amodei has said — not written or endorsed by them.

  1. We already see substantial generalization from things that that verify to things that don't verify. We're already seeing that.

    ↗Dario Amodei — “We are near the end of the exponential”youtube.com 6th of 29 in this recording

  2. Like we see the end productivity every few months in the form of model launches. Like there's no kidding yourself about this. Like the models make you more productive.

    ↗Dario Amodei — “We are near the end of the exponential”youtube.com 9th of 29 in this recording

  3. There's There's nothing preventing longer context from working. You just have to train at longer context and then learn to to serve them at inference. And both of those are engineering problems that we are working on and that I would assume others are working on as well.

    ↗Dario Amodei — “We are near the end of the exponential”youtube.com 12th of 29 in this recording

  4. And if my if my revenue is not a trillion dollars, if it's even 800 billion, there's no force on Earth. There's there's no hedge on Earth that could stop me from going bankrupt if I if I buy that much compute.

    ↗Dario Amodei — “We are near the end of the exponential”youtube.com 13th of 29 in this recording

  5. but at the same time, we're spending $10 billion to train the next model because there's an exponential scale up. And so the company loses money. Each model makes money, but the company loses money.

    ↗Dario Amodei — “We are near the end of the exponential”youtube.com 16th of 29 in this recording

  6. Like models are good at different types of coding. Models have different styles. Like I think I think these things are actually, you know, quite different from each other. And so expect more differentiation than you see in in um cloud.

    ↗Dario Amodei — “We are near the end of the exponential”youtube.com 18th of 29 in this recording

  7. so so I think we're definitely going to see business models that that recognize that, you know, at some point we're going to see, you know, pay for results or you you know, in some in some form or we may see forms of compensation that are like labor. Um, uh you know, that that kind of work by the hour.

    ↗Dario Amodei — “We are near the end of the exponential”youtube.com 23rd of 29 in this recording

  8. it's it's kind of purely a practical and empirical thing that we've observed that by teaching the model principles, getting it to learn from principles, its behavior is more consistent, it's easier to cover edge cases, and the model is more likely to do what people want it to do.

    ↗Dario Amodei — “We are near the end of the exponential”youtube.com 27th of 29 in this recording

  9. 6 years earlier
  10. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which current NLP systems still largely struggle to do.

    ↗Language models are few-shot learners (with 30 co-authors)arxiv.org All 3 from this paper

  11. Here we show that scaling up language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning approaches.

    ↗Language models are few-shot learners (with 30 co-authors)arxiv.org All 3 from this paper