What Charity Majors thinks about vibe coding
Co-founder and CTO of Honeycomb, previously an infrastructure engineer at Parse, Facebook and Linden Lab. Co-author of "Database Reliability Engineering" and "Observability Engineering". Writes at charity.wtf about on-call, hierarchy, hiring and the engineer/manager pendulum.
Everything they publish, on ppll ↗
Charity Majors did not write this page.
We collected these quotes from things they published elsewhere, and every quote links to where it was said. They have no account here and have not endorsed this site. Quotes are word for word; the short line under each one is our own restatement, not their wording. Their own site. Is this you? Claim it or ask us to remove it. Or tell us what is wrong here.
3 dated positions, 2026, in their own words. Our reading of what Charity Majors has said — not written or endorsed by them.
-
Their wordsWhat I was saying in that piece though was, I think we were right to be skeptical that time. But now, I see the same thing playing out with would you be willing to ship it some code you didn't read? There's no point in arguing about if it will happen or when it will happen. Talk about what it would take.
↗Stop being skeptical about AI for development with Charity Majorsyoutube.com 4th of 26 in this recording
-
Their wordsOkay, if I'm not going to read this code, how do I know it's going to perform within boundaries of the last code that I generated? That is conformance testing.
↗Stop being skeptical about AI for development with Charity Majorsyoutube.com 11th of 26 in this recording
-
Their wordsIf you're debiting from this trust account in the creation of the code, it has to get built up somewhere else.
↗Stop being skeptical about AI for development with Charity Majorsyoutube.com 12th of 26 in this recording