If you are not going to read the generated code, what you need is conformance testing: proof that it performs within the boundaries of the code it replaced.

Added to korrents 12 Aug 2026 · How quotes work · Something wrong? Tell us

Related korrents

Our reading — they may agree, disagree or merely touch the same thing. Closest first: a shared subject counts for most, then how near the wording is.

• AI-written code makes formal proof necessary, because human review of all that generated code becomes the bottleneck. MKMartin Kleppmann22 Apr 2026code generation
• He does not read the boring parts of generated code, the data-shuffling and button alignment; what touches the database he reads and reviews. PSPeter Steinberger12 Feb 2026code generation
• A language-agnostic conformance suite is the most powerful thing you can hand a coding agent, because the whole instruction becomes: write code until these tests pass. SWSimon Willison19 Mar 2026similar wording
• The hard part of verification is not proving the code correct but working out what the specification should say. HWHillel Wayne21 Jan 2019similar wording
• Agentic code review raises the floor but cannot be trusted, because the model reading the code is the same model that wrote it, and it will tell you the code is great. DHDex Horthy15 Jul 2026similar wording

On the map

Open the map on its own page →