What Bruce Schneier thinks about cybersecurity
Security technologist and author, lecturer at the Harvard Kennedy School and a board member of the Electronic Frontier Foundation. He has written about the economics and politics of security at schneier.com since 2004, and coined much of the vocabulary the encryption debate is argued in.
Bruce Schneier did not write this page.
We collected these quotes from things they published elsewhere, and every quote links to where it was said. They have no account here and have not endorsed this site. Quotes are word for word; the short line under each one is our own restatement, not their wording. Their own site. Is this you? Claim it or ask us to remove it. Or tell us what is wrong here.
Filter cybersecurity · Newest first
Only Bruce Schneier on cybersecurity. See everyone on cybersecurity
4 dated positions, 2016 to 2026, in their own words. Our reading of what Bruce Schneier has said — not written or endorsed by them.
-
Their wordsThis kind of thing will be exploited. Think Solar Winds–style supply chain attacks.
↗AI Coding Agents Are Installing Unknown/Untrusted Code on Corporate Networksschneier.com
- 11 years earlier
-
Their wordsWhat all these data breaches are teaching us is that data is a toxic asset and saving it is dangerous.
- 5 weeks earlier
-
Our readingWidespread encryption protects far more against bulk surveillance than against a targeted attacker.
Their wordsUbiquitous encryption protects us much more from bulk surveillance than from targeted surveillance.
↗Security vs. Surveillanceschneier.com 3rd of 4 in this piece
-
Their wordsIf a sufficiently skilled, funded, and motivated attacker wants in to your computer, they’re in.
↗Security vs. Surveillanceschneier.com 4th of 4 in this piece