Tap a claim on the ring to put it at the centre.
← The ScienceGuardians X account anonymously attempts to smear the…
12 connected korrents · 11 moments from 13 Dec 2022 to 5 Nov 2026.
Everything filed under social media
social media
Everything filed under peer review
peer review
Everything filed under AI slop
AI slop
Everything filed under climate change
climate change Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Read this korrent: The ScienceGuardians X account anonymously attempts to smear the reputation of PubPeer commenters through false accusations. The ScienceGuardians X account anonymously attempts to smear the reputation of PubPeer commenters through false accusations. Last stated 2 years ago
18 Apr 2025
EB
Elisabeth Bik — holds since 2025-04-18 — tap for who they are
Same subject: The ScienceGuardians X account appears to be run by one or more disgruntled scientists with problematic papers. — tap to centre the map on it The ScienceGuardians X account appears to be run by one or more disgruntled scientists with problematic papers. Last stated 2 years ago
18 Apr 2025
EB
Elisabeth Bik — holds since 2025-04-18 — tap for who they are
Same subject: The strategy used against attribution science is to libel scientists and exaggerate uncertainties to justify inaction. — tap to centre the map on it The strategy used against attribution science is to libel scientists and exaggerate uncertainties to justify inaction. Last stated yesterday
5 Nov 2026
AD
Andrew Dessler — holds since 2026-11-05 — tap for who they are
Same subject: The ScienceGuardians X account follows the DARVO pattern of denying, attacking, and reversing victim and offender. — tap to centre the map on it The ScienceGuardians X account follows the DARVO pattern of denying, attacking, and reversing victim and offender. Last stated 2 years ago
18 Apr 2025
EB
Elisabeth Bik — holds since 2025-04-18 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Authors should treat peer review as a test run before a select, hand-picked audience. — tap to centre the map on it Authors should treat peer review as a test run before a select, hand-picked audience. Last stated 3 years ago
25 Apr 2024
SH
Suzana Herculano-Houzel — holds since 2024-04-25 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Automatic filters cannot replace community acceptance, and human referees cannot be removed from mathematical publication. — tap to centre the map on it Automatic filters cannot replace community acceptance, and human referees cannot be removed from mathematical publication. Last stated 3 months ago
17 Aug 2026
TT
Terence Tao — holds since 2026-08-17 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Combining multiple AI models' outputs into one final answer tends to discard most of the good ideas that only one model produced. — tap to centre the map on it Combining multiple AI models' outputs into one final answer tends to discard most of the good ideas that only one model produced. Last stated 5 months ago
15 Jun 2026
RK
Rohit Krishnan — holds since 2026-06-15 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Economics journals have made large datasets and heavy statistics the price of making any causal claim at all, which has squeezed qualitative economic history out of the field. — tap to centre the map on it Economics journals have made large datasets and heavy statistics the price of making any causal claim at all, which has squeezed qualitative economic history out of the field. Last stated a year ago
13 Oct 2025
AH
Anton Howes — holds since 2025-10-13 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Fraudulent papers pass peer review routinely, which is direct evidence that peer review does not do the job it is supposed to do. — tap to centre the map on it Fraudulent papers pass peer review routinely, which is direct evidence that peer review does not do the job it is supposed to do. Last stated 4 years ago
13 Dec 2022
AM
Adam Mastroianni — holds since 2022-12-13 — tap for who they are
Same subject: History has a reproducibility problem worse than science’s replication crisis, because hardly anyone ever goes back to the sources to check what a historian claimed they say. — tap to centre the map on it History has a reproducibility problem worse than science’s replication crisis, because hardly anyone ever goes back to the sources to check what a historian claimed they say. Last stated 3 years ago
29 Aug 2023
AH
Anton Howes — holds since 2023-08-29 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A badly written AI outbound email is evidence of a bad vendor, not of a limit of AI. — tap to centre the map on it A badly written AI outbound email is evidence of a bad vendor, not of a limit of AI. Last stated 10 months ago
1 Jan 2026
JL
Jason Lemkin — holds since 2026-01-01 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A low-effort AI-designed landing page costs a product its audience before the product itself is ever judged. — tap to centre the map on it A low-effort AI-designed landing page costs a product its audience before the product itself is ever judged. Last stated 3 months ago
13 Aug 2026
MH
Mitchell Hashimoto — holds since 2026-08-13 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A skill is basically a prompt, sometimes a large one, more like a style guide: the best practice for taste, which font to use, and how to guide AI not to create AI slop. — tap to centre the map on it A skill is basically a prompt, sometimes a large one, more like a style guide: the best practice for taste, which font to use, and how to guide AI not to create AI slop. Last stated 4 months ago
30 Jun 2026
MT
Meng To — holds since 2026-06-30 — tap for who they are
At the centre
The ScienceGuardians X account anonymously attempts to smear the reputation of PubPeer commenters through false accusations.
Holds Read this korrent →
The ScienceGuardians X account appears to be run by one or more disgruntled scientists with problematic papers.
Holds
The strategy used against attribution science is to libel scientists and exaggerate uncertainties to justify inaction.
Holds
The ScienceGuardians X account follows the DARVO pattern of denying, attacking, and reversing victim and offender.
Holds
Authors should treat peer review as a test run before a select, hand-picked audience.
Holds
Automatic filters cannot replace community acceptance, and human referees cannot be removed from mathematical publication.
Holds
Combining multiple AI models' outputs into one final answer tends to discard most of the good ideas that only one model produced.
Holds
Economics journals have made large datasets and heavy statistics the price of making any causal claim at all, which has squeezed qualitative economic history out of the field.
Holds
Fraudulent papers pass peer review routinely, which is direct evidence that peer review does not do the job it is supposed to do.
Holds
History has a reproducibility problem worse than science’s replication crisis, because hardly anyone ever goes back to the sources to check what a historian claimed they say.
Holds
A badly written AI outbound email is evidence of a bad vendor, not of a limit of AI.
Holds
A low-effort AI-designed landing page costs a product its audience before the product itself is ever judged.
Holds
A skill is basically a prompt, sometimes a large one, more like a style guide: the best practice for taste, which font to use, and how to guide AI not to create AI slop.
Holds