korrents

A korrentour readingWhat is a korrent?

The original 'China shock' research was about American institutions failing the communities that were hit, not about unfair Chinese competition.

Drawn from what Adam Tooze said

SubjectsChinaAmerica
Interesting
A private bookmark. Not a position, and never counted.

What Adam Tooze actually said

Word for word, with the source under each one. They did not write this page.

  1. Adam Tooze

    Economic historian, Kathryn and Shelby Cullom Davis…

    The original point of the China Shock 1.0 discourse was not to foreground the unfairness of Chiense competition, so much as the malfunctioning of US policy and societal institutions in the face of concentrated globalization shocks.

    Where this was said

    ↗Chartbook 462: China shocked - beyond 1.0 and 2.0 to the "Big One".adamtooze.substack.com

    All 5 korrents from this piecethis one is 2nd

Added to korrents 29 Jul 2026 · How quotes work · Something wrong? Tell us

Do you hold this korrent?Do you also believe this?

Sign in to record that you hold this, with a confidence number of your own.

Related korrents

Our reading — they may agree, disagree or merely touch the same thing. Closest first: a shared subject counts for most, then how near the wording is.

See this on the map →