17 connected korrents · 18 moments from 18 Sept 2025 to 13 Oct 2026.
At the centre
Preventing agent-generated slop is a simple three-pronged process involving high quality PR creation, agentic PR review, and disaster recovery processes.
Last stated 13 Oct 2026 · a week ago
Holds
Kent C. Dodds
Read this korrent →
-
Similar wording
Low-quality AI-generated code contributions betray the care that goes into writing and maintaining software for others.
Last stated 25 Sept 2026 · 4 weeks ago
Holds
Cory Doctorow
-
Similar wording
Unchecked AI video generation risks degenerating into a reinforcement-learning-optimized feed of low-quality content that traps users.
Last stated 30 Sept 2025 · a year ago
Holds
Sam Altman
-
Similar wording
Running coding agents without approval prompts is a normalization-of-deviance risk: the fact that it has not caused a disaster yet is itself the problem.
Last stated 31 Dec 2025 · 10 months ago
Holds
Simon Willison
-
Similar wording
Seeing each version an agent pipeline produces, instead of a black box, shows where the process is too weak.
Last stated 11 Aug 2026 · 2 months ago
Holds
Kyle Zantos
-
Similar wording
Agents that use and grade a product are probably ending the days of needing people to obsessively test every part of it.
Last stated 10 Sept 2026 · a month ago
Holds
Robby Stein
-
Similar wording
Questions whether software that works, performs well, has no bugs, is understood, and can later be modified by an agent should be called slop.
Last stated 2 Oct 2026 · 3 weeks ago
Holds
Thorsten Ball
-
Similar wording
Part of the AI slop problem is probably people handing off accountability for the work they send.
Last stated 27 Sept 2026 · 3 weeks ago
Holds
Molly Graham
-
Similar wording
AI coding agents advance open source's founding goal by letting far more people modify software, so barring AI-assisted contributions protects a guild rather than the mission.
Last stated 1 Jun 2026 · 5 months ago
Holds
David Heinemeier Hansson
-
Same subject: code generation
A model can now port essentially any codebase from one programming language to another, work that used to take a team over a year.
Last stated 27 Jul 2026 · 3 months ago
Holds
Boris Cherny
-
Same subject: code generation
AI acceleration threatens 'less software': without the constraint of scarce hours, even 37signals will likely build too much.
Last stated 26 Jul 2026 · 3 months ago
Holds
David Heinemeier Hansson
-
Same subject: code generation
AI code generation's default reward loop works like a slot machine and undermines skill retention.
Last stated 28 May 2026 · 5 months ago
Holds
Vicki Boykis
-
Same subject: software quality
95 percent of the software made in an age of abundance will be shitty, and shitty software is easy to deal with because it goes away.
Last stated 23 Sept 2026 · 4 weeks ago
Holds
Geoff Teehan
-
Same subject: software quality
A feature added to a codebase is extremely difficult to remove once other code is built on top of it.
Last stated 1 Sept 2026 · 2 months ago
Holds
Vicki Boykis
-
Same subject: software quality
A feature shipped in a product's official release is fair to judge, regardless of whether the company labels it a beta.
Last stated 14 Sept 2026 · a month ago
Holds
Jason Snell
-
Same subject: developer tools
A compiler that also serves an IDE has to be lazy and deferred throughout — a different way of building compilers from the one the textbooks teach.
Last stated 13 May 2026 · 5 months ago
Holds
Anders Hejlsberg
-
Same subject: developer tools
A good tool raises the floor of what people can build without lowering the ceiling, and almost every tool quietly lowers the ceiling.
Last stated 18 Sept 2025 · a year ago
Holds
Tobias Lütke
-
Same subject: developer tools
A new API framework that ignores how existing apps were historically built undermines its own introduction
Last stated 31 Aug 2026 · 2 months ago
Holds
Craig Hockenberry