Tap a claim on the ring to put it at the centre.
← If AI is risky like fire, everyone should have it; if it is risky like a nuclear weapon, no one should.
17 connected korrents · 16 moments from 10 Oct 2023 to 3 Nov 2026.
Everything filed under AI alignment
AI alignment
Everything filed under AI agents
AI agents
Everything filed under AGI
AGI
Everything filed under reinforcement learning
reinforcement learning
Everything filed under censorship
censorship
Everything filed under nuclear power
nuclear power Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Read this korrent: If AI is risky like fire, everyone should have it; if it is risky like a nuclear weapon, no one should. If AI is risky like fire, everyone should have it; if it is risky like a nuclear weapon, no one should. Last stated 2 months ago
16 Sept 2026
NR
Naval Ravikant — holds since 2026-09-16 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Fear of AI's risks leads some people to argue for trading a lot of liberty for safety, and that argument tends to end up justifying power-seeking. — tap to centre the map on it Fear of AI's risks leads some people to argue for trading a lot of liberty for safety, and that argument tends to end up justifying power-seeking. Last stated 2 months ago
23 Aug 2026
SA
Sam Altman — holds since 2026-08-23 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Like speech, AI is powerful and sometimes dangerous, but giving someone the power to decide which AI everyone else may use is more dangerous. — tap to centre the map on it Like speech, AI is powerful and sometimes dangerous, but giving someone the power to decide which AI everyone else may use is more dangerous. Last stated 4 months ago
29 Jun 2026
QS
Quinn Slack — holds since 2026-06-29 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Giving AI agents the ability to take actions that affect other people is risky and should be approached with caution. — tap to centre the map on it Giving AI agents the ability to take actions that affect other people is risky and should be approached with caution. Last stated 11 months ago
3 Dec 2025
HR
Harper Reed — holds since 2025-12-03 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Perhaps the two biggest AI risks, somewhat in tension, are losing control of AI and power becoming too centralized in one company, model or person. — tap to centre the map on it Perhaps the two biggest AI risks, somewhat in tension, are losing control of AI and power becoming too centralized in one company, model or person. Last stated 2 months ago
23 Aug 2026
SA
Sam Altman — holds since 2026-08-23 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Making AI safe is unlike making a nuclear reactor safe, because AI keeps changing and reacting to the safety measures — tap to centre the map on it Making AI safe is unlike making a nuclear reactor safe, because AI keeps changing and reacting to the safety measures Last stated 3 years ago
11 Jan 2024
YH
Yuval Noah Harari — holds since 2024-01-11 — tap for who they are
Same subject: AI is powerful enough that we should err on the side of safety at each level, but making it safe is not an unsolvable problem. — tap to centre the map on it AI is powerful enough that we should err on the side of safety at each level, but making it safe is not an unsolvable problem. Last stated 2 months ago
23 Aug 2026
SA
Sam Altman — holds since 2026-08-23 — tap for who they are
Same subject: The net effects of AI may be catastrophic. — tap to centre the map on it The net effects of AI may be catastrophic. Last stated 4 months ago
18 Jul 2026
JH
John Horgan — holds since 2026-07-18 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Nuclear safety should be pursued by reducing the consequence of an accident rather than its odds, because something unpredictable always happens. — tap to centre the map on it Nuclear safety should be pursued by reducing the consequence of an accident rather than its odds, because something unpredictable always happens. Last stated 3 months ago
15 Aug 2026
IT
Isaiah Taylor — holds since 2026-08-15 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A country outside the AI supply chain should just buy the index — which works only in the world where AI ends up commoditised rather than concentrated. — tap to centre the map on it A country outside the AI supply chain should just buy the index — which works only in the world where AI ends up commoditised rather than concentrated. Last stated 5 months ago
4 Jun 2026
AI
Alex Imas — holds since 2026-06-04 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A language model is no substitute for a well-specified conventional algorithm, so it cannot simply be dropped into a complex problem and trusted. — tap to centre the map on it A language model is no substitute for a well-specified conventional algorithm, so it cannot simply be dropped into a complex problem and trusted. Last stated a year ago
7 Jun 2025
GM
Gary Marcus — holds since 2025-06-07 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A model that could learn effectively from raw bitstrings or bytestrings would be extremely powerful, able to learn from any data modality — tap to centre the map on it A model that could learn effectively from raw bitstrings or bytestrings would be extremely powerful, able to learn from any data modality Last stated 3 years ago
10 Oct 2023
CH
Chip Huyen — holds since 2023-10-10 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A codebase is the most important context an AI agent has, and letting many different models add to it without consistent patterns leads to trouble. — tap to centre the map on it A codebase is the most important context an AI agent has, and letting many different models add to it without consistent patterns leads to trouble. Last stated 2 days ago
3 Nov 2026
DB
Derek Briggs — holds since 2026-11-03 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A collection of AI agents does not automatically form a functioning organization any more than a group of smart people does. — tap to centre the map on it A collection of AI agents does not automatically form a functioning organization any more than a group of smart people does. Last stated 6 months ago
21 May 2026
RK
Rohit Krishnan — holds since 2026-05-21 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A company cannot be led by machines, because nobody would have recourse against them. — tap to centre the map on it A company cannot be led by machines, because nobody would have recourse against them. Last stated 2 months ago
15 Sept 2026
TL
Tobias Lütke — holds since 2026-09-15 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A physical AI company needs three AIs, not one — the agent, the simulator and the critic — turning deployment into a flywheel. — tap to centre the map on it A physical AI company needs three AIs, not one — the agent, the simulator and the critic — turning deployment into a flywheel. Last stated 3 months ago
3 Aug 2026
DD
Dmitri Dolgov — holds since 2026-08-03 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A verifiable task can be optimised by reinforcement learning until a neural network performs it extremely well. — tap to centre the map on it A verifiable task can be optimised by reinforcement learning until a neural network performs it extremely well. Last stated 12 months ago
17 Nov 2025
AK
Andrej Karpathy — holds since 2025-11-17 — tap for who they are
Same subject: AlphaGo showed that for over 2,000 years human minds explored only a small part of the landscape of Go — tap to centre the map on it AlphaGo showed that for over 2,000 years human minds explored only a small part of the landscape of Go Last stated 11 months ago
11 Dec 2025
YH
Yuval Noah Harari — holds since 2025-12-11 — tap for who they are
At the centre
If AI is risky like fire, everyone should have it; if it is risky like a nuclear weapon, no one should.
Holds Read this korrent →
Fear of AI's risks leads some people to argue for trading a lot of liberty for safety, and that argument tends to end up justifying power-seeking.
Holds
Like speech, AI is powerful and sometimes dangerous, but giving someone the power to decide which AI everyone else may use is more dangerous.
Holds
Giving AI agents the ability to take actions that affect other people is risky and should be approached with caution.
Holds
Perhaps the two biggest AI risks, somewhat in tension, are losing control of AI and power becoming too centralized in one company, model or person.
Holds
Making AI safe is unlike making a nuclear reactor safe, because AI keeps changing and reacting to the safety measures
Holds
AI is powerful enough that we should err on the side of safety at each level, but making it safe is not an unsolvable problem.
Holds
The net effects of AI may be catastrophic.
Holds
Nuclear safety should be pursued by reducing the consequence of an accident rather than its odds, because something unpredictable always happens.
Holds
A country outside the AI supply chain should just buy the index — which works only in the world where AI ends up commoditised rather than concentrated.
Holds
A language model is no substitute for a well-specified conventional algorithm, so it cannot simply be dropped into a complex problem and trusted.
Holds
A model that could learn effectively from raw bitstrings or bytestrings would be extremely powerful, able to learn from any data modality
Holds
A codebase is the most important context an AI agent has, and letting many different models add to it without consistent patterns leads to trouble.
Holds
A collection of AI agents does not automatically form a functioning organization any more than a group of smart people does.
Holds
A company cannot be led by machines, because nobody would have recourse against them.
Holds
A physical AI company needs three AIs, not one — the agent, the simulator and the critic — turning deployment into a flywheel.
Holds
A verifiable task can be optimised by reinforcement learning until a neural network performs it extremely well.
Holds
AlphaGo showed that for over 2,000 years human minds explored only a small part of the landscape of Go
Holds