Going all in on AI is not the highest-return strategy for human flourishing, even if AI does produce rapid scientific advances.

Added to korrents 2 Aug 2025 · How quotes work · Something wrong? Tell us

Where this collides

• In tension with

  Managing the transition to a world with abundant and powerful AI should be one of the highest priorities in the world.

  Altman says managing the transition to abundant and powerful AI should be one of the highest priorities in the world. Trefethen says going all in on AI is not the highest-return strategy for human flourishing even if AI does produce rapid progress, because the bottlenecks that remain are not ones a model removes. Both are priority claims, and they rank the same portfolio differently.

Related korrents

Our reading — they may agree, disagree or merely touch the same thing. Closest first: a shared subject counts for most, then how near the wording is.

• Rapid AI progress does not automatically produce rapid medical progress; without complementary investment, people still get cancer and Alzheimer's. JTJacob Trefethen2 Aug 2025similar wording
• AI research is on a good trajectory overall — good for science and good for society — and existential concerns will only become relevant in the distant future. YBYoshua Bengio12 Aug 2023similar wording
• Scaling up spending on expert human data has not been a major driver of progress in AI research. RGRyan Greenblatt11 Aug 2026similar wording
• Even the most advanced AI cannot be followed blindly in investing, where value added is zero-sum and what is widely known is therefore worth little. RDRay Dalio10 Jun 2026similar wording
• There are few clear-cut cases in biopharma today where buying an AI system is obviously worth it. DLDerek Lowe14 Oct 2024similar wording

On the map

Open the map on its own page →