Tap a claim on the ring to put it at the centre.
← GitHub's workflow, review process and merge queue are built for a pre-agent era and don't fit how agents work.
17 connected korrents · 15 moments on record from 3 Feb 2025 to 3 Sept 2026.
Everything filed under coding agents
coding agents
Everything filed under code generation
code generation
Everything filed under Anthropic
Anthropic
Everything filed under vibe coding
vibe coding
Everything filed under software quality
software quality
Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject
Read this korrent: GitHub's workflow, review process and merge queue are built for a pre-agent era and don't fit how agents work.
GitHub's workflow, review process and merge queue are built for a pre-agent era and don't fit how agents work.
Last stated a month ago
10 Aug 2026
FA
Fatih Arslan — holds since 2026-08-10 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Review became a worse bottleneck under AI, because companies removed the review automation they had once AI started writing the code. — tap to centre the map on it
Review became a worse bottleneck under AI, because companies removed the review automation they had once AI started writing the code.
Last stated 6 months ago
22 Mar 2026
NF
Nicole Forsgren — holds since 2026-03-22 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Software engineering agents will work before any other kind of agent, because code is the one domain where the machine can check its own answer. — tap to centre the map on it
Software engineering agents will work before any other kind of agent, because code is the one domain where the machine can check its own answer.
Last stated 2 years ago
3 Feb 2025
DP
Dylan Patel — holds since 2025-02-03 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Line-by-line code review has become an outdated ritual: senior engineers should be giving feedback on how their team instructs AI, not on the code AI wrote. — tap to centre the map on it
Line-by-line code review has become an outdated ritual: senior engineers should be giving feedback on how their team instructs AI, not on the code AI wrote.
Last stated 6 months ago
29 Mar 2026
CH
Chip Huyen — holds since 2026-03-29 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Reviewing agent-written code is risk management rather than reading: how long the change took and how big it is tell you when to look closely. — tap to centre the map on it
Reviewing agent-written code is risk management rather than reading: how long the change took and how big it is tell you when to look closely.
Last stated a month ago
10 Aug 2026
PS
Peter Steinberger — holds since 2026-08-10 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A maintainer no longer needs to read every pull request; agents can sort the chaff and leave only the decisions worth a human. — tap to centre the map on it
A maintainer no longer needs to read every pull request; agents can sort the chaff and leave only the decisions worth a human.
Last stated 4 weeks ago
26 Aug 2026
DH
David Heinemeier Hansson — holds since 2026-08-26 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Code review as a review mechanism depends on reviewers being able to infer effort from reading code, and AI-agent-generated code erases that signal. — tap to centre the map on it
Code review as a review mechanism depends on reviewers being able to infer effort from reading code, and AI-agent-generated code erases that signal.
Last stated 5 months ago
7 May 2026
DC
David Crawshaw — holds since 2026-05-07 — tap for who they are
Same subject: The code today’s models and agents write is very hard to follow: you get better performance without knowing why, and no way to fix it when it breaks. — tap to centre the map on it
The code today’s models and agents write is very hard to follow: you get better performance without knowing why, and no way to fix it when it breaks.
Last stated 2 months ago
19 Jul 2026
ES
Elizabeth Stone — holds since 2026-07-19 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Agent-written pull requests already outclass those of the median human contributor to an open source project. — tap to centre the map on it
Agent-written pull requests already outclass those of the median human contributor to an open source project.
Last stated 4 weeks ago
26 Aug 2026
DH
David Heinemeier Hansson — holds since 2026-08-26 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A model can now port essentially any codebase from one programming language to another, work that used to take a team over a year. — tap to centre the map on it
A model can now port essentially any codebase from one programming language to another, work that used to take a team over a year.
Last stated 2 months ago
27 Jul 2026
BC
Boris Cherny — holds since 2026-07-27 — tap for who they are
Same subject: AI acceleration threatens 'less software': without the constraint of scarce hours, even 37signals will likely build too much. — tap to centre the map on it
AI acceleration threatens 'less software': without the constraint of scarce hours, even 37signals will likely build too much.
Last stated 2 months ago
26 Jul 2026
DH
David Heinemeier Hansson — holds since 2026-07-26 — tap for who they are
Same subject: AI has made it cheap to build the features that were never worth building, so shipping a new feature every day can make a product worse rather than better. — tap to centre the map on it
AI has made it cheap to build the features that were never worth building, so shipping a new feature every day can make a product worse rather than better.
Last stated 3 months ago
24 Jun 2026
NE
NeetCode — holds since 2026-06-24 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A benchmark that ranks Claude Code last while it stays first in use is measuring the wrong thing, and has been for a year. — tap to centre the map on it
A benchmark that ranks Claude Code last while it stays first in use is measuring the wrong thing, and has been for a year.
Last stated 3 weeks ago
3 Sept 2026
DR
Dax Raad — holds since 2026-09-03 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A language model asked to summarize its own system prompt risks that prompt's content biasing the summary it produces. — tap to centre the map on it
A language model asked to summarize its own system prompt risks that prompt's content biasing the summary it produces.
Last stated 3 weeks ago
2 Sept 2026
SW
Simon Willison — holds since 2026-09-02 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A trust that owns the mission protects a company better than founder control does, which is why Anthropic needs no dual-class shares. — tap to centre the map on it
A trust that owns the mission protects a company better than founder control does, which is why Anthropic needs no dual-class shares.
Last stated 4 months ago
10 May 2026
ER
Eric Ries — holds since 2026-05-10 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A person at maximum vibe-coding speed has about three productive hours a day, and a company that will not let them stop there is going to break. — tap to centre the map on it
A person at maximum vibe-coding speed has about three productive hours a day, and a company that will not let them stop there is going to break.
Last stated 6 months ago
11 Mar 2026
SY
Steve Yegge — holds since 2026-03-11 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A sense of achievement in software survives writing almost none of the code yourself. — tap to centre the map on it
A sense of achievement in software survives writing almost none of the code yourself.
Last stated 4 weeks ago
26 Aug 2026
DH
David Heinemeier Hansson — holds since 2026-08-26 — tap for who they are
Same subject: AI should be used as a failure machine that tests many ideas cheaply, not as a way to build one idea faster. — tap to centre the map on it
AI should be used as a failure machine that tests many ideas cheaply, not as a way to build one idea faster.
Last stated 3 months ago
14 Jun 2026
MP
Mark Pincus — holds since 2026-06-14 — tap for who they are
same subject or similar wording a cloud: claims about one subject, named for it bar: when it was last stated, on a scale from 2015 to today — full is today a face: someone on record holding the claim — tap it for who they are
At the centre
GitHub's workflow, review process and merge queue are built for a pre-agent era and don't fit how agents work.
Last stated 10 Aug 2026 · a month ago
Holds Fatih Arslan
Read this korrent →
Similar wording
Review became a worse bottleneck under AI, because companies removed the review automation they had once AI started writing the code.
Last stated 22 Mar 2026 · 6 months ago
Holds Nicole Forsgren
Similar wording
Software engineering agents will work before any other kind of agent, because code is the one domain where the machine can check its own answer.
Last stated 3 Feb 2025 · 2 years ago
Holds Dylan Patel
Similar wording
Line-by-line code review has become an outdated ritual: senior engineers should be giving feedback on how their team instructs AI, not on the code AI wrote.
Last stated 29 Mar 2026 · 6 months ago
Holds Chip Huyen
Similar wording
Reviewing agent-written code is risk management rather than reading: how long the change took and how big it is tell you when to look closely.
Last stated 10 Aug 2026 · a month ago
Holds Peter Steinberger
Similar wording
A maintainer no longer needs to read every pull request; agents can sort the chaff and leave only the decisions worth a human.
Last stated 26 Aug 2026 · 4 weeks ago
Holds David Heinemeier Hansson
Similar wording
Code review as a review mechanism depends on reviewers being able to infer effort from reading code, and AI-agent-generated code erases that signal.
Last stated 7 May 2026 · 5 months ago
Holds David Crawshaw
Similar wording
The code today’s models and agents write is very hard to follow: you get better performance without knowing why, and no way to fix it when it breaks.
Last stated 19 Jul 2026 · 2 months ago
Holds Elizabeth Stone
Similar wording
Agent-written pull requests already outclass those of the median human contributor to an open source project.
Last stated 26 Aug 2026 · 4 weeks ago
Holds David Heinemeier Hansson
Same subject: code generation
A model can now port essentially any codebase from one programming language to another, work that used to take a team over a year.
Last stated 27 Jul 2026 · 2 months ago
Holds Boris Cherny
Same subject: code generation
AI acceleration threatens 'less software': without the constraint of scarce hours, even 37signals will likely build too much.
Last stated 26 Jul 2026 · 2 months ago
Holds David Heinemeier Hansson
Same subject: code generation
AI has made it cheap to build the features that were never worth building, so shipping a new feature every day can make a product worse rather than better.
Last stated 24 Jun 2026 · 3 months ago
Holds NeetCode
Same subject: Anthropic
A benchmark that ranks Claude Code last while it stays first in use is measuring the wrong thing, and has been for a year.
Last stated 3 Sept 2026 · 3 weeks ago
Holds Dax Raad
Same subject: Anthropic
A language model asked to summarize its own system prompt risks that prompt's content biasing the summary it produces.
Last stated 2 Sept 2026 · 3 weeks ago
Holds Simon Willison
Same subject: Anthropic
A trust that owns the mission protects a company better than founder control does, which is why Anthropic needs no dual-class shares.
Last stated 10 May 2026 · 4 months ago
Holds Eric Ries
Same subject: vibe coding
A person at maximum vibe-coding speed has about three productive hours a day, and a company that will not let them stop there is going to break.
Last stated 11 Mar 2026 · 6 months ago
Holds Steve Yegge
Same subject: vibe coding
A sense of achievement in software survives writing almost none of the code yourself.
Last stated 26 Aug 2026 · 4 weeks ago
Holds David Heinemeier Hansson
Same subject: vibe coding
AI should be used as a failure machine that tests many ideas cheaply, not as a way to build one idea faster.
Last stated 14 Jun 2026 · 3 months ago
Holds Mark Pincus