Tap a claim on the ring to put it at the centre.
← GitHub's workflow, review process and merge queue are built for a pre-agent era and don't fit how agents work.
17 connected korrents · 17 moments from 3 Feb 2025 to 3 Nov 2026.
Everything filed under coding agents
coding agents
Everything filed under developer tools
developer tools
Everything filed under Anthropic
Anthropic
Everything filed under code generation
code generation
Everything filed under design
design Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Read this korrent: GitHub's workflow, review process and merge queue are built for a pre-agent era and don't fit how agents work. GitHub's workflow, review process and merge queue are built for a pre-agent era and don't fit how agents work. Last stated 3 months ago
10 Aug 2026
FA
Fatih Arslan — holds since 2026-08-10 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Seeing each version an agent pipeline produces, instead of a black box, shows where the process is too weak. — tap to centre the map on it Seeing each version an agent pipeline produces, instead of a black box, shows where the process is too weak. Last stated 3 months ago
11 Aug 2026
KZ
Kyle Zantos — holds since 2026-08-11 — tap for who they are
Same subject: GitHub's pull request review tooling has always lagged behind its quality as a code host. — tap to centre the map on it GitHub's pull request review tooling has always lagged behind its quality as a code host. Last stated 2 years ago
13 Apr 2025
TC
Tyler Cipriani — holds since 2025-04-13 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Review became a worse bottleneck under AI, because companies removed the review automation they had once AI started writing the code. — tap to centre the map on it Review became a worse bottleneck under AI, because companies removed the review automation they had once AI started writing the code. Last stated 7 months ago
22 Mar 2026
NF
Nicole Forsgren — holds since 2026-03-22 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Software engineering agents will work before any other kind of agent, because code is the one domain where the machine can check its own answer. — tap to centre the map on it Software engineering agents will work before any other kind of agent, because code is the one domain where the machine can check its own answer. Last stated 2 years ago
3 Feb 2025
DP
Dylan Patel — holds since 2025-02-03 — tap for who they are
Same subject: When the repo already has a design system, high fidelity matters less, since fonts and spacing are already set and all the agent needs is a direction. — tap to centre the map on it When the repo already has a design system, high fidelity matters less, since fonts and spacing are already set and all the agent needs is a direction. Last stated 4 months ago
21 Jul 2026
PS
Pablo Stanley — holds since 2026-07-21 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Line-by-line code review has become an outdated ritual: senior engineers should be giving feedback on how their team instructs AI, not on the code AI wrote. — tap to centre the map on it Line-by-line code review has become an outdated ritual: senior engineers should be giving feedback on how their team instructs AI, not on the code AI wrote. Last stated 7 months ago
29 Mar 2026
CH
Chip Huyen — holds since 2026-03-29 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Reviewing agent-written code is risk management rather than reading: how long the change took and how big it is tell you when to look closely. — tap to centre the map on it Reviewing agent-written code is risk management rather than reading: how long the change took and how big it is tell you when to look closely. Last stated 3 months ago
10 Aug 2026
PS
Peter Steinberger — holds since 2026-08-10 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A maintainer no longer needs to read every pull request; agents can sort the chaff and leave only the decisions worth a human. — tap to centre the map on it A maintainer no longer needs to read every pull request; agents can sort the chaff and leave only the decisions worth a human. Last stated 2 months ago
26 Aug 2026
DH
David Heinemeier Hansson — holds since 2026-08-26 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A compiler that also serves an IDE has to be lazy and deferred throughout — a different way of building compilers from the one the textbooks teach. — tap to centre the map on it A compiler that also serves an IDE has to be lazy and deferred throughout — a different way of building compilers from the one the textbooks teach. Last stated 6 months ago
13 May 2026
AH
Anders Hejlsberg — holds since 2026-05-13 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A feature-rich native 'view source' option for debugging sites with iPadOS would be beneficial. — tap to centre the map on it A feature-rich native 'view source' option for debugging sites with iPadOS would be beneficial. Last stated a year ago
11 Jul 2025
CO
Christian Oliff — holds since 2025-07-11 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A good tool raises the floor of what people can build without lowering the ceiling, and almost every tool quietly lowers the ceiling. — tap to centre the map on it A good tool raises the floor of what people can build without lowering the ceiling, and almost every tool quietly lowers the ceiling. Last stated a year ago
18 Sept 2025
TL
Tobias Lütke — holds since 2025-09-18 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A codebase is the most important context an AI agent has, and letting many different models add to it without consistent patterns leads to trouble. — tap to centre the map on it A codebase is the most important context an AI agent has, and letting many different models add to it without consistent patterns leads to trouble. Last stated 2 days ago
3 Nov 2026
DB
Derek Briggs — holds since 2026-11-03 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A model can now port essentially any codebase from one programming language to another, work that used to take a team over a year. — tap to centre the map on it A model can now port essentially any codebase from one programming language to another, work that used to take a team over a year. Last stated 3 months ago
27 Jul 2026
BC
Boris Cherny — holds since 2026-07-27 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A strong manual coding background helps developers spot algorithmic weaknesses and flaws in generated code. — tap to centre the map on it A strong manual coding background helps developers spot algorithmic weaknesses and flaws in generated code. Last stated 3 weeks ago
15 Oct 2026
AT
Adam Tornhill — holds since 2026-10-15 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A benchmark that ranks Claude Code last while it stays first in use is measuring the wrong thing, and has been for a year. — tap to centre the map on it A benchmark that ranks Claude Code last while it stays first in use is measuring the wrong thing, and has been for a year. Last stated 2 months ago
3 Sept 2026
DR
Dax Raad — holds since 2026-09-03 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A skill is a set of repeatable, specific instructions that augments what Claude Code can do. — tap to centre the map on it A skill is a set of repeatable, specific instructions that augments what Claude Code can do. Last stated 8 months ago
19 Mar 2026
KP
Kris Puckett — holds since 2026-03-19 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A story's quality depends on whether it engages and satisfies the reader, not on the tool used to write it. — tap to centre the map on it A story's quality depends on whether it engages and satisfies the reader, not on the tool used to write it. Last stated 2 months ago
30 Aug 2026
EP
Eliot Peper — holds since 2026-08-30 — tap for who they are
At the centre
GitHub's workflow, review process and merge queue are built for a pre-agent era and don't fit how agents work.
Holds Read this korrent →
Seeing each version an agent pipeline produces, instead of a black box, shows where the process is too weak.
Holds
GitHub's pull request review tooling has always lagged behind its quality as a code host.
Holds
Review became a worse bottleneck under AI, because companies removed the review automation they had once AI started writing the code.
Holds
Software engineering agents will work before any other kind of agent, because code is the one domain where the machine can check its own answer.
Holds
When the repo already has a design system, high fidelity matters less, since fonts and spacing are already set and all the agent needs is a direction.
Holds
Line-by-line code review has become an outdated ritual: senior engineers should be giving feedback on how their team instructs AI, not on the code AI wrote.
Holds
Reviewing agent-written code is risk management rather than reading: how long the change took and how big it is tell you when to look closely.
Holds
A maintainer no longer needs to read every pull request; agents can sort the chaff and leave only the decisions worth a human.
Holds
A compiler that also serves an IDE has to be lazy and deferred throughout — a different way of building compilers from the one the textbooks teach.
Holds
A feature-rich native 'view source' option for debugging sites with iPadOS would be beneficial.
Holds
A good tool raises the floor of what people can build without lowering the ceiling, and almost every tool quietly lowers the ceiling.
Holds
A codebase is the most important context an AI agent has, and letting many different models add to it without consistent patterns leads to trouble.
Holds
A model can now port essentially any codebase from one programming language to another, work that used to take a team over a year.
Holds
A strong manual coding background helps developers spot algorithmic weaknesses and flaws in generated code.
Holds
A benchmark that ranks Claude Code last while it stays first in use is measuring the wrong thing, and has been for a year.
Holds
A skill is a set of repeatable, specific instructions that augments what Claude Code can do.
Holds
A story's quality depends on whether it engages and satisfies the reader, not on the tool used to write it.
Holds