GitHub's workflow, review process and merge queue are built for a pre-agent era and don't fit how agents work.

Added to korrents 10 Aug 2026 · How quotes work · Something wrong? Tell us

Related korrents

Our reading — they may agree, disagree or merely touch the same thing. Closest first: a shared subject counts for most, then how near the wording is.

• Review became a worse bottleneck under AI, because companies removed the review automation they had once AI started writing the code. NFNicole Forsgren22 Mar 2026similar wordingResearcher of software delivery performance
• Software engineering agents will work before any other kind of agent, because code is the one domain where the machine can check its own answer. DPDylan Patel3 Feb 2025similar wordingFounder and chief executive of SemiAnalysis
• Line-by-line code review has become an outdated ritual: senior engineers should be giving feedback on how their team instructs AI, not on the code AI wrote. CHChip Huyen29 Mar 2026similar wordingEngineer and writer on machine-learning systems
• Reviewing agent-written code is risk management rather than reading: how long the change took and how big it is tell you when to look closely. PSPeter Steinberger10 Aug 2026similar wordingFounded PSPDFKit in 2011 and ran it for a decade
• A maintainer no longer needs to read every pull request; agents can sort the chaff and leave only the decisions worth a human. DHDavid Heinemeier Hansson26 Aug 2026similar wordingCreator of Ruby on Rails, CTO of 37signals

On the map

Open the map on its own page →