Tap a claim on the ring to put it at the centre.
← Some engineering teams celebrating velocity gains are flying blind to…
17 connected korrents · 16 moments from 5 Jan 2024 to 23 Sept 2026.
Everything filed under software quality
software quality
Everything filed under product management
product management
Everything filed under AI and jobs
AI and jobs
Everything filed under coding agents
coding agents
Everything filed under management
management
Everything filed under Microsoft
Microsoft
Everything filed under design
design
Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject
Read this korrent: Some engineering teams celebrating velocity gains are flying blind to product quality degradations that power users immediately notice but cannot easily report.
Some engineering teams celebrating velocity gains are flying blind to product quality degradations that power users immediately notice but cannot easily report.
Last stated 2 months ago
11 Sept 2026
GO
Gergely Orosz — holds since 2026-09-11 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Agents that use and grade a product are probably ending the days of needing people to obsessively test every part of it. — tap to centre the map on it
Agents that use and grade a product are probably ending the days of needing people to obsessively test every part of it.
Last stated 2 months ago
10 Sept 2026
RS
Robby Stein — holds since 2026-09-10 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A company that looks to its users as though it has stopped shipping is usually widening its market, and grinding through that is worth it. — tap to centre the map on it
A company that looks to its users as though it has stopped shipping is usually widening its market, and grinding through that is worth it.
Last stated 2 years ago
23 Mar 2025
RV
Rahul Vohra — holds since 2025-03-23 — tap for who they are
Same subject: AI-validated pull requests beat human review at exactly the things humans are bad at, which frees the humans to argue about direction instead. — tap to centre the map on it
AI-validated pull requests beat human review at exactly the things humans are bad at, which frees the humans to argue about direction instead.
Last stated 2 months ago
12 Aug 2026
CM
Charity Majors — holds since 2026-08-12 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A few larger teams under experienced engineering managers outperform many tiny teams each led by a working tech lead. — tap to centre the map on it
A few larger teams under experienced engineering managers outperform many tiny teams each led by a working tech lead.
Last stated 3 years ago
5 Jan 2024
CM
Charity Majors — holds since 2024-01-05 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Ignore both the users who love your product and the ones who are indifferent to it; the only feedback that raises product-market fit comes from the somewhat disappointed. — tap to centre the map on it
Ignore both the users who love your product and the ones who are indifferent to it; the only feedback that raises product-market fit comes from the somewhat disappointed.
Last stated 2 years ago
23 Mar 2025
RV
Rahul Vohra — holds since 2025-03-23 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A company that handed its engineers Copilot and thinks it is now moving faster will be destroyed by the people using frontier models. — tap to centre the map on it
A company that handed its engineers Copilot and thinks it is now moving faster will be destroyed by the people using frontier models.
Last stated 8 months ago
11 Mar 2026
SY
Steve Yegge — holds since 2026-03-11 — tap for who they are
Same subject: The engineer-designer-PM pod ratio was an HR artifact of scaling, not something anyone showed a product needed. — tap to centre the map on it
The engineer-designer-PM pod ratio was an HR artifact of scaling, not something anyone showed a product needed.
Last stated 3 months ago
2 Aug 2026
TV
Tom Verrilli — holds since 2026-08-02 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Great engineers rarely complain about product managers, because they bend them to their will and do not put up with bad ones. — tap to centre the map on it
Great engineers rarely complain about product managers, because they bend them to their will and do not put up with bad ones.
Last stated a month ago
20 Sept 2026
PS
Peter Sellis — holds since 2026-09-20 — tap for who they are
Same subject: 95 percent of the software made in an age of abundance will be shitty, and shitty software is easy to deal with because it goes away. — tap to centre the map on it
95 percent of the software made in an age of abundance will be shitty, and shitty software is easy to deal with because it goes away.
Last stated a month ago
23 Sept 2026
GT
Geoff Teehan — holds since 2026-09-23 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A coding agent left to run over a weekend returns work that is half good, a quarter garbage and a quarter in need of repair. — tap to centre the map on it
A coding agent left to run over a weekend returns work that is half good, a quarter garbage and a quarter in need of repair.
Last stated a year ago
18 Aug 2025
CB
Clay Bavor — holds since 2025-08-18 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A developer using AI coding tools remains responsible for reviewing the code they ship. — tap to centre the map on it
A developer using AI coding tools remains responsible for reviewing the code they ship.
Last stated 8 months ago
10 Mar 2026
JS
Jon Seager — holds since 2026-03-10 — tap for who they are
Same subject: AI-assisted coding will generate a lot of low-quality output that developers will need to clean up, even as it also produces good results. — tap to centre the map on it
AI-assisted coding will generate a lot of low-quality output that developers will need to clean up, even as it also produces good results.
Last stated 9 months ago
9 Feb 2026
SH
Scott Hanselman — holds since 2026-02-09 — tap for who they are
Same subject: AI-generated code should be treated as untrusted until there is evidence it preserves the intended behavior. — tap to centre the map on it
AI-generated code should be treated as untrusted until there is evidence it preserves the intended behavior.
Last stated 2 months ago
19 Aug 2026
JS
Jon Seager — holds since 2026-08-19 — tap for who they are
Same subject: As AI makes it easier to generate code, teams must delete code more aggressively or be overwhelmed by accumulated complexity. — tap to centre the map on it
As AI makes it easier to generate code, teams must delete code more aggressively or be overwhelmed by accumulated complexity.
Last stated 2 months ago
1 Sept 2026
VB
Vicki Boykis — holds since 2026-09-01 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A team that slows down and reads every pull request and every line of code should expect only a 30 to 50 percent productivity lift from AI. — tap to centre the map on it
A team that slows down and reads every pull request and every line of code should expect only a 30 to 50 percent productivity lift from AI.
Last stated 3 months ago
15 Jul 2026
DH
Dex Horthy — holds since 2026-07-15 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Agent-written code that runs and passes its tests is not enough: security, maintainability and being able to roll it back still need humans in the loop. — tap to centre the map on it
Agent-written code that runs and passes its tests is not enough: security, maintainability and being able to roll it back still need humans in the loop.
Last stated 5 months ago
7 Jun 2026
TF
Tony Fadell — holds since 2026-06-07 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Agentic code review raises the floor but cannot be trusted, because the model reading the code is the same model that wrote it, and it will tell you the code is great. — tap to centre the map on it
Agentic code review raises the floor but cannot be trusted, because the model reading the code is the same model that wrote it, and it will tell you the code is great.
Last stated 3 months ago
15 Jul 2026
DH
Dex Horthy — holds since 2026-07-15 — tap for who they are
same subject or similar wording a cloud: claims about one subject, named for it bar: when it was last stated, on a scale from 2015 to today — full is today a face: someone who holds the claim — tap it for who they are
At the centre
Some engineering teams celebrating velocity gains are flying blind to product quality degradations that power users immediately notice but cannot easily report.
Last stated 11 Sept 2026 · 2 months ago
Holds Gergely Orosz
Read this korrent →
Similar wording
Agents that use and grade a product are probably ending the days of needing people to obsessively test every part of it.
Last stated 10 Sept 2026 · 2 months ago
Holds Robby Stein
Similar wording
A company that looks to its users as though it has stopped shipping is usually widening its market, and grinding through that is worth it.
Last stated 23 Mar 2025 · 2 years ago
Holds Rahul Vohra
Similar wording
AI-validated pull requests beat human review at exactly the things humans are bad at, which frees the humans to argue about direction instead.
Last stated 12 Aug 2026 · 2 months ago
Holds Charity Majors
Similar wording
A few larger teams under experienced engineering managers outperform many tiny teams each led by a working tech lead.
Last stated 5 Jan 2024 · 3 years ago
Holds Charity Majors
Similar wording
Ignore both the users who love your product and the ones who are indifferent to it; the only feedback that raises product-market fit comes from the somewhat disappointed.
Last stated 23 Mar 2025 · 2 years ago
Holds Rahul Vohra
Similar wording
A company that handed its engineers Copilot and thinks it is now moving faster will be destroyed by the people using frontier models.
Last stated 11 Mar 2026 · 8 months ago
Holds Steve Yegge
Similar wording
The engineer-designer-PM pod ratio was an HR artifact of scaling, not something anyone showed a product needed.
Last stated 2 Aug 2026 · 3 months ago
Holds Tom Verrilli
Similar wording
Great engineers rarely complain about product managers, because they bend them to their will and do not put up with bad ones.
Last stated 20 Sept 2026 · a month ago
Holds Peter Sellis
Same subject: software quality
95 percent of the software made in an age of abundance will be shitty, and shitty software is easy to deal with because it goes away.
Last stated 23 Sept 2026 · a month ago
Holds Geoff Teehan
Same subject: software quality
A coding agent left to run over a weekend returns work that is half good, a quarter garbage and a quarter in need of repair.
Last stated 18 Aug 2025 · a year ago
Holds Clay Bavor
Same subject: software quality
A developer using AI coding tools remains responsible for reviewing the code they ship.
Last stated 10 Mar 2026 · 8 months ago
Holds Jon Seager
Same subject: code generation
AI-assisted coding will generate a lot of low-quality output that developers will need to clean up, even as it also produces good results.
Last stated 9 Feb 2026 · 9 months ago
Holds Scott Hanselman
Same subject: code generation
AI-generated code should be treated as untrusted until there is evidence it preserves the intended behavior.
Last stated 19 Aug 2026 · 2 months ago
Holds Jon Seager
Same subject: code generation
As AI makes it easier to generate code, teams must delete code more aggressively or be overwhelmed by accumulated complexity.
Last stated 1 Sept 2026 · 2 months ago
Holds Vicki Boykis
Same subject: coding agents
A team that slows down and reads every pull request and every line of code should expect only a 30 to 50 percent productivity lift from AI.
Last stated 15 Jul 2026 · 3 months ago
Holds Dex Horthy
Same subject: coding agents
Agent-written code that runs and passes its tests is not enough: security, maintainability and being able to roll it back still need humans in the loop.
Last stated 7 Jun 2026 · 5 months ago
Holds Tony Fadell
Same subject: coding agents
Agentic code review raises the floor but cannot be trusted, because the model reading the code is the same model that wrote it, and it will tell you the code is great.
Last stated 15 Jul 2026 · 3 months ago
Holds Dex Horthy