korrents

On the map

Tap a claim on the ring to put it at the centre.

← Code should be accepted based on its merit and accountability for it should be assigned.

17 connected korrents · 17 moments from 1 Jan 2026 to 2 Oct 2026.

Everything filed under software quality software quality Everything filed under AI slop AI slop Everything filed under code generation code generation Everything filed under AI writing AI writing Everything filed under LLMs LLMs Same subjectSame subjectSame subjectSame subjectSame subjectSame subjectSame subjectSame subjectSame subjectSame subjectSame subjectSame subjectSame subjectSame subjectSame subjectSame subjectSame subject Read this korrent: Code should be accepted based on its merit and accountability for it should be assigned. Code should be accepted based on its meritand accountability for it should beassigned. Last stated 2 weeks ago 20 Sept 2026 TL Tobias Lütke — holds since 2026-09-20 — tap for who they are Same subject: Software can be considered slop if it meets certain functional and maintainable criteria. — tap to centre the map on it Software can be considered slop ifit meets certain functional andmaintainable criteria. Last stated today 2 Oct 2026 TB Thorsten Ball — holds since 2026-10-02 — tap for who they are Same subject: Low-quality AI-generated code contributions betray the care that goes into writing and maintaining software for others. — tap to centre the map on it Low-quality AI-generated codecontributions betray the care thatgoes into writing and maintainingsoftware for others. Last stated a week ago 25 Sept 2026 CD Cory Doctorow — holds since 2026-09-25 — tap for who they are Same subject: Part of the AI slop problem is probably people handing off accountability for the work they send. — tap to centre the map on it Part of the AI slop problem isprobably people handing offaccountability for the work theysend. Last stated 5 days ago 27 Sept 2026 MG Molly Graham — holds since 2026-09-27 — tap for who they are Same subject: The specific rules taught as clean code are simply bad programming practices, and they get worse when you apply them together. — tap to centre the map on it The specific rules taught as cleancode are simply bad programmingpractices, and they get worse whenyou apply them together. Last stated a month ago 26 Aug 2026 CM Casey Muratori — holds since 2026-08-26 — tap for who they are Same subject: There is no proof good code will matter in the future, since the notion is based on human ease of use and humans will not modify most code. — tap to centre the map on it There is no proof good code willmatter in the future, since thenotion is based on human ease of useand humans will not modify mostcode. Last stated 2 weeks ago 19 Sept 2026 TB Thorsten Ball — holds since 2026-09-19 — tap for who they are Same subject: Line-by-line code review has become an outdated ritual: senior engineers should be giving feedback on how their team instructs AI, not on the code AI wrote. — tap to centre the map on it Line-by-line code review has becomean outdated ritual: senior engineersshould be giving feedback on howtheir team instructs AI, not on thecode AI wrote. Last stated 6 months ago 29 Mar 2026 CH Chip Huyen — holds since 2026-03-29 — tap for who they are Same subject: AI-written code is fine when only the visual result matters, but insufficient in technical domains where understanding what is actually being computed is required. — tap to centre the map on it AI-written code is fine when onlythe visual result matters, butinsufficient in technical domainswhere understanding what is actuallybeing computed is required. Last stated 4 months ago 16 Jun 2026 SW Stephen Wolfram — holds since 2026-06-16 — tap for who they are Same subject: Work produced by one frontier model should be reviewed by a different one, for the same reason a good programmer's work improves under a good peer's review. — tap to centre the map on it Work produced by one frontier modelshould be reviewed by a differentone, for the same reason a goodprogrammer's work improves under agood peer's review. Last stated a month ago 26 Aug 2026 DH David Heinemeier Hansson — holds since 2026-08-26 — tap for who they are Same subject: Modern AI models tend to write many tests that are not useful. — tap to centre the map on it Modern AI models tend to write manytests that are not useful. Last stated a week ago 24 Sept 2026 PS Peter Steinberger — holds since 2026-09-24 — tap for who they are Same subject: A badly written AI outbound email is evidence of a bad vendor, not of a limit of AI. — tap to centre the map on it A badly written AI outbound email isevidence of a bad vendor, not of alimit of AI. Last stated 9 months ago 1 Jan 2026 JL Jason Lemkin — holds since 2026-01-01 — tap for who they are Same subject: A growing fraction of social media is AI slop influencers being replied to by bots — an echo of an echo of an echo. — tap to centre the map on it A growing fraction of social mediais AI slop influencers being repliedto by bots — an echo of an echo ofan echo. Last stated a month ago 23 Aug 2026 FC François Chollet — holds since 2026-08-23 — tap for who they are Same subject: A model can now port essentially any codebase from one programming language to another, work that used to take a team over a year. — tap to centre the map on it A model can now port essentially anycodebase from one programminglanguage to another, work that usedto take a team over a year. Last stated 2 months ago 27 Jul 2026 BC Boris Cherny — holds since 2026-07-27 — tap for who they are Same subject: Agent-generated pull requests have exploded in size with no signs of slowing down — tap to centre the map on it Agent-generated pull requests haveexploded in size with no signs ofslowing down Last stated 2 weeks ago 16 Sept 2026 GO Gergely Orosz — holds since 2026-09-16 — tap for who they are Same subject: Agents are the new compilers that compile intent into fast software. — tap to centre the map on it Agents are the new compilers thatcompile intent into fast software. Last stated 3 weeks ago 12 Sept 2026 GR Guillermo Rauch — holds since 2026-09-12 — tap for who they are Same subject: A stream of AI-written papers with any error rate at all becomes insufferable, because finding the error costs more than the paper is worth even at ninety-nine percent. — tap to centre the map on it A stream of AI-written papers withany error rate at all becomesinsufferable, because finding theerror costs more than the paper isworth even at ninety-nine percent. Last stated 3 months ago 30 Jun 2026 GS Grant Sanderson — holds since 2026-06-30 — tap for who they are Same subject: AI-generated junk papers risk overwhelming the hep-th physics field with worthless content. — tap to centre the map on it AI-generated junk papers riskoverwhelming the hep-th physicsfield with worthless content. Last stated 3 months ago 15 Jul 2026 PW Peter Woit — holds since 2026-07-15 — tap for who they are Same subject: AI-generated writing tends to repeat the same themes, names, and underlying ideas across different outputs. — tap to centre the map on it AI-generated writing tends to repeatthe same themes, names, andunderlying ideas across differentoutputs. Last stated a month ago 31 Aug 2026 EM Ethan Mollick — holds since 2026-08-31 — tap for who they are
same subject or similar wordinga cloud: claims about one subject, named for itbar: when it was last stated, on a scale from 2015 to today — full is todaya face: someone who holds the claim — tap it for who they are

At the centre Code should be accepted based on its merit and accountability for it should be assigned. Last stated 20 Sept 2026 · 2 weeks ago Holds Tobias Lütke Read this korrent →