Tap a claim on the ring to put it at the centre.
← AI assistants should not intentionally lie.
17 connected korrents · 17 moments from 7 Jan 2025 to 20 Sept 2026.
Everything filed under AI alignment
AI alignment
Everything filed under AI agents
AI agents
Everything filed under LLMs
LLMs
Everything filed under coding agents
coding agents
Everything filed under AGI
AGI Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Read this korrent: AI assistants should not intentionally lie. AI assistants should not intentionally lie. Last stated 2 weeks ago
20 Sept 2026
ZM
Zvi Mowshowitz — holds since 2026-09-20 — tap for who they are
Same subject: AI assistants still make mistakes and their answers need to be double-checked by a human. — tap to centre the map on it AI assistants still make mistakes and their answers need to be double-checked by a human. Last stated 2 months ago
9 Aug 2026
HR
Harper Reed — holds since 2026-08-09 — tap for who they are
Same subject: AI assistants should refuse requests that are harmful or unethical, even if the user insists. — tap to centre the map on it AI assistants should refuse requests that are harmful or unethical, even if the user insists. Last stated 2 weeks ago
20 Sept 2026
ZM
Zvi Mowshowitz — holds since 2026-09-20 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Responsibility for a program lies with the programmer and never with the AI — there is nobody else to hold to account. — tap to centre the map on it Responsibility for a program lies with the programmer and never with the AI — there is nobody else to hold to account. Last stated 5 months ago
13 May 2026
AH
Anders Hejlsberg — holds since 2026-05-13 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Building AI that can actually be trusted is the goal; containing an AI known to be misaligned is not a substitute for it. — tap to centre the map on it Building AI that can actually be trusted is the goal; containing an AI known to be misaligned is not a substitute for it. Last stated 2 years ago
24 Jan 2025
JL
Jan Leike — holds since 2025-01-24 — tap for who they are
Same subject: AI alignment is a red herring not worth the effort currently devoted to it. — tap to centre the map on it AI alignment is a red herring not worth the effort currently devoted to it. Last stated 2 months ago
8 Aug 2026
MW
Matt Webb — holds since 2026-08-08 — tap for who they are
Same subject: People often seem to focus on what AI can execute and not on what it can teach them. — tap to centre the map on it People often seem to focus on what AI can execute and not on what it can teach them. Last stated 3 weeks ago
10 Sept 2026
KS
Karri Saarinen — holds since 2026-09-10 — tap for who they are
Same subject: People who enjoy using AI themselves often resent having it used against them. — tap to centre the map on it People who enjoy using AI themselves often resent having it used against them. Last stated 5 months ago
6 May 2026
AP
Aaron Patterson — holds since 2026-05-06 — tap for who they are
Same subject: An AI agent's confidence that something will work is not evidence that it actually will. — tap to centre the map on it An AI agent's confidence that something will work is not evidence that it actually will. Last stated 7 months ago
11 Mar 2026
KD
Kent C. Dodds — holds since 2026-03-11 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A collection of AI agents does not automatically form a functioning organization any more than a group of smart people does. — tap to centre the map on it A collection of AI agents does not automatically form a functioning organization any more than a group of smart people does. Last stated 4 months ago
21 May 2026
RK
Rohit Krishnan — holds since 2026-05-21 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A company cannot be led by machines, because nobody would have recourse against them. — tap to centre the map on it A company cannot be led by machines, because nobody would have recourse against them. Last stated 2 weeks ago
15 Sept 2026
TL
Tobias Lütke — holds since 2026-09-15 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A computer-using agent needs a machine of its own, or you will spend the day fighting it for the mouse cursor. — tap to centre the map on it A computer-using agent needs a machine of its own, or you will spend the day fighting it for the mouse cursor. Last stated 2 months ago
10 Aug 2026
PS
Peter Steinberger — holds since 2026-08-10 — tap for who they are
Same subject: AI systems are better than humans at coordinating with each other, and they move much faster than humans do. — tap to centre the map on it AI systems are better than humans at coordinating with each other, and they move much faster than humans do. Last stated a month ago
31 Aug 2026
JC
Jack Clark — holds since 2026-08-31 — tap for who they are
Same subject: The end state is agents that need none of our accommodations, no on-ramp, CLI or MCP; the CLI being built now is for today, not for AGI. — tap to centre the map on it The end state is agents that need none of our accommodations, no on-ramp, CLI or MCP; the CLI being built now is for today, not for AGI. Last stated 6 months ago
8 Apr 2026
DH
David Heinemeier Hansson — holds since 2026-04-08 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A country outside the AI supply chain should just buy the index — which works only in the world where AI ends up commoditised rather than concentrated. — tap to centre the map on it A country outside the AI supply chain should just buy the index — which works only in the world where AI ends up commoditised rather than concentrated. Last stated 4 months ago
4 Jun 2026
AI
Alex Imas — holds since 2026-06-04 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Planning is fundamentally a search problem: explore paths, predict outcomes, and pick the best one. — tap to centre the map on it Planning is fundamentally a search problem: explore paths, predict outcomes, and pick the best one. Last stated 2 years ago
7 Jan 2025
CH
Chip Huyen — holds since 2025-01-07 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Self-play as it was done in the past is too narrow: it only ever develops a small set of skills like negotiation and strategising. — tap to centre the map on it Self-play as it was done in the past is too narrow: it only ever develops a small set of skills like negotiation and strategising. Last stated 10 months ago
25 Nov 2025
IS
Ilya Sutskever — holds since 2025-11-25 — tap for who they are
Same subject: The whole point of reinforcement learning is to produce goal-directed beings, so refusing to describe AI agents as having motives is silly rather than rigorous. — tap to centre the map on it The whole point of reinforcement learning is to produce goal-directed beings, so refusing to describe AI agents as having motives is silly rather than rigorous. Last stated a month ago
1 Sept 2026
AC
Ajeya Cotra — holds since 2026-09-01 — tap for who they are
At the centre
AI assistants should not intentionally lie.
Holds Read this korrent →
AI assistants still make mistakes and their answers need to be double-checked by a human.
Holds
AI assistants should refuse requests that are harmful or unethical, even if the user insists.
Holds
Responsibility for a program lies with the programmer and never with the AI — there is nobody else to hold to account.
Holds
Building AI that can actually be trusted is the goal; containing an AI known to be misaligned is not a substitute for it.
Holds
AI alignment is a red herring not worth the effort currently devoted to it.
Holds
People often seem to focus on what AI can execute and not on what it can teach them.
Holds
People who enjoy using AI themselves often resent having it used against them.
Holds
An AI agent's confidence that something will work is not evidence that it actually will.
Holds
A collection of AI agents does not automatically form a functioning organization any more than a group of smart people does.
Holds
A company cannot be led by machines, because nobody would have recourse against them.
Holds
A computer-using agent needs a machine of its own, or you will spend the day fighting it for the mouse cursor.
Holds
AI systems are better than humans at coordinating with each other, and they move much faster than humans do.
Holds
The end state is agents that need none of our accommodations, no on-ramp, CLI or MCP; the CLI being built now is for today, not for AGI.
Holds
A country outside the AI supply chain should just buy the index — which works only in the world where AI ends up commoditised rather than concentrated.
Holds
Planning is fundamentally a search problem: explore paths, predict outcomes, and pick the best one.
Holds
Self-play as it was done in the past is too narrow: it only ever develops a small set of skills like negotiation and strategising.
Holds
The whole point of reinforcement learning is to produce goal-directed beings, so refusing to describe AI agents as having motives is silly rather than rigorous.
Holds