Tap a claim on the ring to put it at the centre.
← AIs past this point should not be assumed to treat their chain of thought as unmonitored.
17 connected korrents · 20 moments on record from 7 Sept 2008 to 19 Sept 2026.
Everything filed under AI alignment
AI alignment
Everything filed under LLMs
LLMs
Everything filed under AI sentience
AI sentience
Everything filed under AGI
AGI
Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject
Read this korrent: AIs past this point should not be assumed to treat their chain of thought as unmonitored.
AIs past this point should not be assumed to treat their chain of thought as unmonitored.
Last stated today
19 Sept 2026
ZM
Zvi Mowshowitz — holds since 2026-09-19 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A thought that was never captured was never uploaded, so AI has never seen it, and that is where humans remain unique. — tap to centre the map on it
A thought that was never captured was never uploaded, so AI has never seen it, and that is where humans remain unique.
Last stated a month ago
10 Aug 2026
FL
Fei-Fei Li — holds since 2026-08-10 — tap for who they are
Same subject: AI systems are not sentient, and the odds of them being sentient are vanishingly small. — tap to centre the map on it
AI systems are not sentient, and the odds of them being sentient are vanishingly small.
Last stated 3 weeks ago
31 Aug 2026
TC
Tyler Cowen — holds since 2026-08-31 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Monitors that read an agent's chain of thought must be kept out of the reward signal, or you are simply training the agent to obfuscate its thinking. — tap to centre the map on it
Monitors that read an agent's chain of thought must be kept out of the reward signal, or you are simply training the agent to obfuscate its thinking.
Last stated 3 weeks ago
1 Sept 2026
AC
Ajeya Cotra — holds since 2026-09-01 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Human-level AI is most likely centuries or millennia away, so there is no reason to reorganise one's work around its arrival. — tap to centre the map on it
Human-level AI is most likely centuries or millennia away, so there is no reason to reorganise one's work around its arrival.
Last stated 3 years ago
13 Dec 2023
SA
Scott Aaronson — holds since 2008-09-07 — tap for who they are
SA
Scott Aaronson — no longer holds since 2023-12-13 — tap for who they are
Same subject: AI should be deployed incrementally and in advance, because a system that does not yet exist is one almost nobody can imagine. — tap to centre the map on it
AI should be deployed incrementally and in advance, because a system that does not yet exist is one almost nobody can imagine.
Last stated 10 months ago
25 Nov 2025
IS
Ilya Sutskever — holds since 2025-11-25 — tap for who they are
Same subject: The likeliest bad path is not a coup but sloppiness: AI does everything verifiable well, research races ahead, and the subtle work of keeping AI safe is what gets done badly. — tap to centre the map on it
The likeliest bad path is not a coup but sloppiness: AI does everything verifiable well, research races ahead, and the subtle work of keeping AI safe is what gets done badly.
Last stated a month ago
11 Aug 2026
RG
Ryan Greenblatt — holds since 2026-08-11 — tap for who they are
Same subject: It is not rational to say AI is likely to end humanity in one's lifetime while completely winging safety measures. — tap to centre the map on it
It is not rational to say AI is likely to end humanity in one's lifetime while completely winging safety measures.
Last stated 6 days ago
13 Sept 2026
FC
François Chollet — holds since 2026-09-13 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Nobody can yet know whether the current enthusiasm for AI is excessive, so anyone claiming conviction about how it resolves is overreaching. — tap to centre the map on it
Nobody can yet know whether the current enthusiasm for AI is excessive, so anyone claiming conviction about how it resolves is overreaching.
Last stated 4 weeks ago
20 Aug 2026
AD
Aswath Damodaran — holds since 2026-08-20 — tap for who they are
HM
Howard Marks — holds since 2025-12-09 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A badly written AI outbound email is evidence of a bad vendor, not of a limit of AI. — tap to centre the map on it
A badly written AI outbound email is evidence of a bad vendor, not of a limit of AI.
Last stated 9 months ago
1 Jan 2026
JL
Jason Lemkin — holds since 2026-01-01 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A bigger context window does not give you a smarter model; the intelligence of the model is what decides how much of that window it can actually attend to. — tap to centre the map on it
A bigger context window does not give you a smarter model; the intelligence of the model is what decides how much of that window it can actually attend to.
Last stated 2 months ago
15 Jul 2026
DH
Dex Horthy — holds since 2026-07-15 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A child who has seen ten cats learns what a machine needs the whole internet of cat photos for, by a learning pathway nobody has solved. — tap to centre the map on it
A child who has seen ten cats learns what a machine needs the whole internet of cat photos for, by a learning pathway nobody has solved.
Last stated a month ago
10 Aug 2026
FL
Fei-Fei Li — holds since 2026-08-10 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Humans can generally perform new language tasks from few examples or simple instructions, while current NLP systems largely cannot. — tap to centre the map on it
Humans can generally perform new language tasks from few examples or simple instructions, while current NLP systems largely cannot.
Last stated 6 years ago
28 May 2020
DA
Dario Amodei — holds since 2020-05-28 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Language models are already a form of AGI; what the labs are chasing is a further step, not the arrival of general intelligence. — tap to centre the map on it
Language models are already a form of AGI; what the labs are chasing is a further step, not the arrival of general intelligence.
Last stated 2 years ago
3 Feb 2025
NL
Nathan Lambert — holds since 2025-02-03 — tap for who they are
Same subject: The jump from Sol to Astra is larger than from Fable 5 to Fable 5.1, and Astra is the best model for ambitious projects with likely the highest raw intelligence of any model. — tap to centre the map on it
The jump from Sol to Astra is larger than from Fable 5 to Fable 5.1, and Astra is the best model for ambitious projects with likely the highest raw intelligence of any model.
Last stated a week ago
12 Sept 2026
ZM
Zvi Mowshowitz — holds since 2026-09-12 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A language model is no substitute for a well-specified conventional algorithm, so it cannot simply be dropped into a complex problem and trusted. — tap to centre the map on it
A language model is no substitute for a well-specified conventional algorithm, so it cannot simply be dropped into a complex problem and trusted.
Last stated a year ago
7 Jun 2025
GM
Gary Marcus — holds since 2025-06-07 — tap for who they are
Same subject: AI progress is faster than people expect, and ordinary scaling can be enough to solve problems that looked very hard. — tap to centre the map on it
AI progress is faster than people expect, and ordinary scaling can be enough to solve problems that looked very hard.
Last stated 2 years ago
2 Feb 2025
AC
Ajeya Cotra — holds since 2023-08-29 — tap for who they are
SA
Scott Alexander — holds since 2022-09-12 — tap for who they are
MB
Miles Brundage — holds since 2025-02-02 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Anyone who thinks large language models are a direct route to transformative AGI is kidding themselves. — tap to centre the map on it
Anyone who thinks large language models are a direct route to transformative AGI is kidding themselves.
Last stated a year ago
7 Jun 2025
GM
Gary Marcus — holds since 2025-06-07 — tap for who they are
same subject or similar wording a cloud: claims about one subject, named for it bar: when it was last stated, on a scale from 2008 to today (stretched back to the oldest claim here) — full is today a face: someone on record holding the claim — tap it for who they are faded, dashed ring: they no longer hold it — they changed their mind
At the centre
AIs past this point should not be assumed to treat their chain of thought as unmonitored.
Last stated 19 Sept 2026 · today
Holds Zvi Mowshowitz
Read this korrent →
Similar wording
A thought that was never captured was never uploaded, so AI has never seen it, and that is where humans remain unique.
Last stated 10 Aug 2026 · a month ago
Holds Fei-Fei Li
Similar wording
AI systems are not sentient, and the odds of them being sentient are vanishingly small.
Last stated 31 Aug 2026 · 3 weeks ago
Holds Tyler Cowen
Similar wording
Monitors that read an agent's chain of thought must be kept out of the reward signal, or you are simply training the agent to obfuscate its thinking.
Last stated 1 Sept 2026 · 3 weeks ago
Holds Ajeya Cotra
Similar wording
Human-level AI is most likely centuries or millennia away, so there is no reason to reorganise one's work around its arrival.
Last stated 13 Dec 2023 · 3 years ago
No longer holds Scott Aaronson
Similar wording
AI should be deployed incrementally and in advance, because a system that does not yet exist is one almost nobody can imagine.
Last stated 25 Nov 2025 · 10 months ago
Holds Ilya Sutskever
Similar wording
The likeliest bad path is not a coup but sloppiness: AI does everything verifiable well, research races ahead, and the subtle work of keeping AI safe is what gets done badly.
Last stated 11 Aug 2026 · a month ago
Holds Ryan Greenblatt
Similar wording
It is not rational to say AI is likely to end humanity in one's lifetime while completely winging safety measures.
Last stated 13 Sept 2026 · 6 days ago
Holds François Chollet
Similar wording
Nobody can yet know whether the current enthusiasm for AI is excessive, so anyone claiming conviction about how it resolves is overreaching.
Last stated 20 Aug 2026 · 4 weeks ago
Holds Aswath Damodaran Howard Marks
Same subject: LLMs
A badly written AI outbound email is evidence of a bad vendor, not of a limit of AI.
Last stated 1 Jan 2026 · 9 months ago
Holds Jason Lemkin
Same subject: LLMs
A bigger context window does not give you a smarter model; the intelligence of the model is what decides how much of that window it can actually attend to.
Last stated 15 Jul 2026 · 2 months ago
Holds Dex Horthy
Same subject: LLMs
A child who has seen ten cats learns what a machine needs the whole internet of cat photos for, by a learning pathway nobody has solved.
Last stated 10 Aug 2026 · a month ago
Holds Fei-Fei Li
Same subject: measuring intelligence
Humans can generally perform new language tasks from few examples or simple instructions, while current NLP systems largely cannot.
Last stated 28 May 2020 · 6 years ago
Holds Dario Amodei
Same subject: measuring intelligence
Language models are already a form of AGI; what the labs are chasing is a further step, not the arrival of general intelligence.
Last stated 3 Feb 2025 · 2 years ago
Holds Nathan Lambert
Same subject: measuring intelligence
The jump from Sol to Astra is larger than from Fable 5 to Fable 5.1, and Astra is the best model for ambitious projects with likely the highest raw intelligence of any model.
Last stated 12 Sept 2026 · a week ago
Holds Zvi Mowshowitz
Same subject: AGI
A language model is no substitute for a well-specified conventional algorithm, so it cannot simply be dropped into a complex problem and trusted.
Last stated 7 Jun 2025 · a year ago
Holds Gary Marcus
Same subject: AGI
AI progress is faster than people expect, and ordinary scaling can be enough to solve problems that looked very hard.
Last stated 2 Feb 2025 · 2 years ago
Holds Ajeya Cotra Scott Alexander Miles Brundage
Same subject: AGI
Anyone who thinks large language models are a direct route to transformative AGI is kidding themselves.
Last stated 7 Jun 2025 · a year ago
Holds Gary Marcus