Tap a claim on the ring to put it at the centre.
← A hardware company can be doing everything right and still fail the Rule of 40 for years.
17 connected korrents · 17 moments from 5 Sept 2024 to 20 Sept 2026.
Everything filed under startups
startups
Everything filed under management
management
Everything filed under semiconductors
semiconductors
Everything filed under infrastructure
infrastructure
Everything filed under Silicon Valley
Silicon Valley
Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject
Read this korrent: A hardware company can be doing everything right and still fail the Rule of 40 for years.
A hardware company can be doing everything right and still fail the Rule of 40 for years.
Last stated 5 months ago
15 Jun 2026
BF
Brad Feld — holds since 2026-06-15 — tap for who they are
Same subject: In hardware you cannot afford a mistake, because today's work ships two years later and fixing an error can cost another year. — tap to centre the map on it
In hardware you cannot afford a mistake, because today's work ships two years later and fixing an error can cost another year.
Last stated 7 months ago
12 Apr 2026
ES
Evan Spiegel — holds since 2026-04-12 — tap for who they are
Same subject: The half-life of a technology company is short, and the few that last decades are the exception rather than the rule. — tap to centre the map on it
The half-life of a technology company is short, and the few that last decades are the exception rather than the rule.
Last stated a year ago
18 Aug 2025
BT
Bret Taylor — holds since 2025-08-18 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Software cannot reach its next level until somebody builds the next level of hardware underneath it. — tap to centre the map on it
Software cannot reach its next level until somebody builds the next level of hardware underneath it.
Last stated 5 months ago
7 Jun 2026
TF
Tony Fadell — holds since 2026-06-07 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A company cannot be led by machines, because nobody would have recourse against them. — tap to centre the map on it
A company cannot be led by machines, because nobody would have recourse against them.
Last stated 2 months ago
15 Sept 2026
TL
Tobias Lütke — holds since 2026-09-15 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A computer company has to live five to ten years in the future, because a system takes three years to build, two to ramp, and is then used for a decade. — tap to centre the map on it
A computer company has to live five to ten years in the future, because a system takes three years to build, two to ramp, and is then used for a decade.
Last stated 3 months ago
26 Jul 2026
JH
Jensen Huang — holds since 2026-07-26 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Deep tech companies rarely fail because the technology does not work; they fail because nobody built the systems to run the organisation around it. — tap to centre the map on it
Deep tech companies rarely fail because the technology does not work; they fail because nobody built the systems to run the organisation around it.
Last stated 3 months ago
7 Aug 2026
MH
Max Hodak — holds since 2026-08-07 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A company that has become bored with the mechanics of running a business cannot succeed, regardless of its strategic success. — tap to centre the map on it
A company that has become bored with the mechanics of running a business cannot succeed, regardless of its strategic success.
Last stated 2 months ago
20 Sept 2026
BC
Bryan Cantrill — holds since 2026-09-20 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Tech companies' trick is to claim that thousands of years of hard-won rules do not apply to them — tap to centre the map on it
Tech companies' trick is to claim that thousands of years of hard-won rules do not apply to them
Last stated 2 years ago
5 Sept 2024
YH
Yuval Noah Harari — holds since 2024-09-05 — tap for who they are
Same subject: “Why now?” is the wrong question to make a founder answer — the honest answer can simply be that you started now. — tap to centre the map on it
“Why now?” is the wrong question to make a founder answer — the honest answer can simply be that you started now.
Last stated 3 months ago
28 Jul 2026
BS
Blake Scholl — holds since 2026-07-28 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A belief nobody else shares is a warning, and a belief everybody shares is also a warning; the right number of people who agree with you is small but not zero. — tap to centre the map on it
A belief nobody else shares is a warning, and a belief everybody shares is also a warning; the right number of people who agree with you is small but not zero.
Last stated 3 months ago
28 Jul 2026
SA
Sam Altman — holds since 2026-07-28 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A big venture firm's edge is deploying capital into what is obviously working; a small firm's is backing a founder or idea that is not yet obvious. — tap to centre the map on it
A big venture firm's edge is deploying capital into what is obviously working; a small firm's is backing a founder or idea that is not yet obvious.
Last stated a year ago
23 Jul 2025
JS
Jon Sakoda — holds since 2025-07-23 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A first-time founder has an advantage over a repeat winner, because past success makes it too easy to raise money and hire against a big vision before there is product-market fit. — tap to centre the map on it
A first-time founder has an advantage over a repeat winner, because past success makes it too easy to raise money and hire against a big vision before there is product-market fit.
Last stated 5 months ago
14 Jun 2026
MP
Mark Pincus — holds since 2026-06-14 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A venture capital "regatta", where most of the race happens before the Series A, is replacing the VC factory model. — tap to centre the map on it
A venture capital "regatta", where most of the race happens before the Series A, is replacing the VC factory model.
Last stated 2 years ago
9 Dec 2024
SL
Sam Lessin — holds since 2024-12-09 — tap for who they are
Same subject: About 5% is the most common final ownership stake for the founder of a VC-funded startup that works out. — tap to centre the map on it
About 5% is the most common final ownership stake for the founder of a VC-funded startup that works out.
Last stated 4 months ago
18 Jul 2026
PL
Pieter Levels — holds since 2026-07-18 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A founder who does not know their own goal dies by a thousand compromises and ends up running a company they do not want to work at. — tap to centre the map on it
A founder who does not know their own goal dies by a thousand compromises and ends up running a company they do not want to work at.
Last stated 5 months ago
2 Jun 2026
MP
Mark Pincus — holds since 2026-06-02 — tap for who they are
Same subject: AI research follows a power law, as startup investing does: the best bet outperforms all the others put together. — tap to centre the map on it
AI research follows a power law, as startup investing does: the best bet outperforms all the others put together.
Last stated 2 months ago
23 Aug 2026
SA
Sam Altman — holds since 2026-08-23 — tap for who they are
Same subject: An investor who passes on a pitch they find truly novel will often still refer it to another investor, to get credit for having found it. — tap to centre the map on it
An investor who passes on a pitch they find truly novel will often still refer it to another investor, to get credit for having found it.
Last stated 3 months ago
5 Aug 2026
ZH
Zach Holman — holds since 2026-08-05 — tap for who they are
same subject or similar wording a cloud: claims about one subject, named for it bar: when it was last stated, on a scale from 2015 to today — full is today a face: someone who holds the claim — tap it for who they are
At the centre
A hardware company can be doing everything right and still fail the Rule of 40 for years.
Last stated 15 Jun 2026 · 5 months ago
Holds Brad Feld
Read this korrent →
Similar wording
In hardware you cannot afford a mistake, because today's work ships two years later and fixing an error can cost another year.
Last stated 12 Apr 2026 · 7 months ago
Holds Evan Spiegel
Similar wording
The half-life of a technology company is short, and the few that last decades are the exception rather than the rule.
Last stated 18 Aug 2025 · a year ago
Holds Bret Taylor
Similar wording
Software cannot reach its next level until somebody builds the next level of hardware underneath it.
Last stated 7 Jun 2026 · 5 months ago
Holds Tony Fadell
Similar wording
A company cannot be led by machines, because nobody would have recourse against them.
Last stated 15 Sept 2026 · 2 months ago
Holds Tobias Lütke
Similar wording
A computer company has to live five to ten years in the future, because a system takes three years to build, two to ramp, and is then used for a decade.
Last stated 26 Jul 2026 · 3 months ago
Holds Jensen Huang
Similar wording
Deep tech companies rarely fail because the technology does not work; they fail because nobody built the systems to run the organisation around it.
Last stated 7 Aug 2026 · 3 months ago
Holds Max Hodak
Similar wording
A company that has become bored with the mechanics of running a business cannot succeed, regardless of its strategic success.
Last stated 20 Sept 2026 · 2 months ago
Holds Bryan Cantrill
Similar wording
Tech companies' trick is to claim that thousands of years of hard-won rules do not apply to them
Last stated 5 Sept 2024 · 2 years ago
Holds Yuval Noah Harari
Same subject: startups
“Why now?” is the wrong question to make a founder answer — the honest answer can simply be that you started now.
Last stated 28 Jul 2026 · 3 months ago
Holds Blake Scholl
Same subject: startups
A belief nobody else shares is a warning, and a belief everybody shares is also a warning; the right number of people who agree with you is small but not zero.
Last stated 28 Jul 2026 · 3 months ago
Holds Sam Altman
Same subject: startups
A big venture firm's edge is deploying capital into what is obviously working; a small firm's is backing a founder or idea that is not yet obvious.
Last stated 23 Jul 2025 · a year ago
Holds Jon Sakoda
Same subject: venture capital
A first-time founder has an advantage over a repeat winner, because past success makes it too easy to raise money and hire against a big vision before there is product-market fit.
Last stated 14 Jun 2026 · 5 months ago
Holds Mark Pincus
Same subject: venture capital
A venture capital "regatta", where most of the race happens before the Series A, is replacing the VC factory model.
Last stated 9 Dec 2024 · 2 years ago
Holds Sam Lessin
Same subject: venture capital
About 5% is the most common final ownership stake for the founder of a VC-funded startup that works out.
Last stated 18 Jul 2026 · 4 months ago
Holds Pieter Levels
Same subject: investing
A founder who does not know their own goal dies by a thousand compromises and ends up running a company they do not want to work at.
Last stated 2 Jun 2026 · 5 months ago
Holds Mark Pincus
Same subject: investing
AI research follows a power law, as startup investing does: the best bet outperforms all the others put together.
Last stated 23 Aug 2026 · 2 months ago
Holds Sam Altman
Same subject: investing
An investor who passes on a pitch they find truly novel will often still refer it to another investor, to get credit for having found it.
Last stated 5 Aug 2026 · 3 months ago
Holds Zach Holman