korrents
Paul Krugman

What Paul Krugman thinks about politics

@paul-krugman · 56 positions · 0 changes of mind

Trade economist, Nobel laureate in 2008 for his work on economic geography, professor emeritus at Princeton and the CUNY Graduate Center, and a New York Times columnist from 1999 to 2024. Now writes on Substack.

Everything they publish, on ppll ↗

Paul Krugman did not write this page.

We collected these quotes from things they published elsewhere, and every quote links to where it was said. They have no account here and have not endorsed this site. Quotes are word for word; the short line under each one is our own restatement, not their wording. Their own site. Is this you? Claim it or ask us to remove it. Or tell us what is wrong here.

5 dated positions, 2025 to 2026, in their own words. Our reading of what Paul Krugman has said — not written or endorsed by them.

The line under a date shows how recently it was said: empty within a month, full after three years.

  1. And then, it seemed to go away. And now it’s kind of back. We used to say it was really terrible that so much seemed to depend upon gas prices over which the president really has no control.

    ↗The Midterms!paulkrugman.substack.com

  2. 3 weeks earlier
  3. America

    But AI does seem to be transforming U.S. politics. I can’t think of a technology that has inspired so much hate across such a wide political spectrum.

    ↗Why Is Trump Still Boosting AI?paulkrugman.substack.com

  4. But of course it won’t work. The AI boom, once Trump’s last remaining political asset, is now a huge liability.

    ↗Why Is Trump Still Boosting AI?paulkrugman.substack.com

  5. 1 day earlier
  6. Climate denial, we know from decades of experience, is fueled by an unholy trinity of financial interest (fossil fuel companies determined to keep their profits flowing), ideology (conservatives hostile to any form of regulation) and psychological insecurity (real men burn stuff.)

    ↗The MAGA Plot(s) to Destroy Humanitypaulkrugman.substack.com

  7. 11 months earlier
  8. energyAmericanuclear power

    But politics aside, what’s notable about that 2001 report, put together by men who regarded themselves as hard-headed realists, is that it envisaged an energy future reliant almost entirely on fossil fuels plus a bit of nuclear energy.

    ↗The Rise of Renewable Energypaulkrugman.substack.com 1st of 2 in this piece

How recent

The line under a date fills as the words age, a quarter at a time: past a month, six months, a year, and three years. Empty means said within the last month; full, more than three years ago. It says when, not whether it still holds — a change of mind is marked on the claim itself.

Dashed means we only know the words existed by that date; they may be older.