korrents
Gernot Wagner

What Gernot Wagner thinks about climate change

@gernot-wagner · 16 positions · On ppll ↗

Austrian-American climate economist at Columbia Business School. Co-author with Martin Weitzman of Climate Shock (2015) and author of Geoengineering: The Gamble (2021); writes columns for Project Syndicate.

Gernot Wagner did not write this page.

We collected these quotes from things they published elsewhere, and every quote links to where it was said. They have no account here and have not endorsed this site. Quotes are word for word; the short line under each one is our own restatement, not their wording. Their own site. Is this you? Claim it or ask us to remove it. Or tell us what is wrong here.

6 dated positions, 2024 to 2025, in their own words. Our reading of what Gernot Wagner has said — not written or endorsed by them.

  1. governmentpolitics

    Nonetheless, even as the US government moves in the wrong direction, trends in science, economics, and increasingly local politics indicate that the pendulum will swing back in due course.

    ↗Gernot Wagnergwagner.com 2nd of 3 in this piece

  2. 2 months earlier
  3. solar

    Trump's efforts to halt the low-carbon transition may be even more futile when it comes to solar, wind, and other low-carbon technologies.

    ↗Gernot Wagnergwagner.com 3rd of 3 in this piece

  4. 3 months earlier
  5. the key to a successful, politically sustainable climate policy is to ensure that the benefits precede the costs.

    ↗Gernot Wagnergwagner.com 1st of 2 in this piece

  6. 3 months earlier
  7. energy

    Nothing short of a clean-energy revolution, complete with clean transport systems and industry, will turn the climate ship around.

    ↗Gernot Wagnergwagner.com 1st of 3 in this piece

  8. Moreover, achieving net-zero emissions requires trillions of dollars in investment, which will add to, not subtract from, economic growth.

    ↗Gernot Wagnergwagner.com 2nd of 3 in this piece

  9. Staving off climate catastrophe will require more growth, not because ever-increasing GDP - itself a fundamentally inadequate metric - is the end goal, but because it is the result of cutting emissions fast enough.

    ↗Gernot Wagnergwagner.com 3rd of 3 in this piece