korrents
François Chollet

François Chollet

@francois-chollet · 51 positions · 2 changes of mind · On ppll ↗

Creator of the Keras deep-learning library and the ARC-AGI benchmark.

François Chollet did not write this page.

We collected these quotes from things they published elsewhere, and every quote links to where it was said. They have no account here and have not endorsed this site. Quotes are word for word; the short line under each one is our own restatement, not their wording. Their own site. Is this you? Claim it or ask us to remove it. Or tell us what is wrong here.

3 of François Chollet's claims fit 3 mental models. Most often: Collective action problems, Leaky abstractions, S-curves and diminishing returns.

Models they name

Their own words name the idea.

S-curves and diminishing returns

Most growth slows as it matures; the question is whether the curve is flattening or something new is restocking it.

Used by 22 others

The LLM line of research will reach a capability plateau.

  1. François Chollet Creator of the Keras deep-learning library and the ARC-AGI benchmark In the era of base LLM scaling (2022-2024), I believed the LLM line of research would reach a capability plateau (as later seen with base LLMs). In late 2024, after the o3 test-time compute demo, I changed my views: the new models were showing genuine fluid intelligence, and with this new line of work, the LLM line of research could achieve unbounded capability scaling. "There will be no wall." @fchollet on Xx.com · 7 Aug 2026

    In the era of base LLM scaling (2022-2024), I believed the LLM line of research would reach a capability plateau (as later seen with base LLMs). In late 2024, after the o3 test-time compute demo, I changed my views: the new models were showing genuine fluid intelligence, and with this new line of work, the LLM line of research could achieve unbounded capability scaling. "There will be no wall."

Models we see in what they say

Our reading: their claim applies the idea without naming it. The claim is theirs; filing it here is ours.

Collective action problems

What everyone would gain from, nobody provides alone, so shared goods need someone or something to hold people together.

Used by 21 others

If AI has a high chance of causing human extinction within years or decades, the only rational stance on safety monitoring and research pacing is stringent top-down government involvement and universally ratified international treaties.

  1. François Chollet Creator of the Keras deep-learning library and the ARC-AGI benchmark If there really is a high chance of AI leading to the extinction of humanity within years/decades, then the only rational stance towards safety monitoring and research pacing should be stringent, top-down government involvement and universally ratified international treaties. @fchollet on Xx.com · 13 Sept 2026
    If there really is a high chance of AI leading to the extinction of humanity within years/decades, then the only rational stance towards safety monitoring and research pacing should be stringent, top-down government involvement and universally ratified international treaties.

Leaky abstractions

A shortcut that hides the details works until it doesn't; when it breaks, someone has to know what is underneath.

Used by 8 others

The difficulty of software engineering is probably essentially constant across abstraction levels, because human cognition adapts to new tools.

  1. François Chollet Creator of the Keras deep-learning library and the ARC-AGI benchmark I think the "difficulty" of software engineering is essentially constant no matter what abstraction level you move to, because human cognition adapts to new tools until it can fully utilize itself. @fchollet on Xx.com · 25 Sept 2026
    I think the "difficulty" of software engineering is essentially constant no matter what abstraction level you move to, because human cognition adapts to new tools until it can fully utilize itself.